慢性气道阻塞患者对支气管扩张剂的反应模式。

S C Yang, M C Wu
{"title":"慢性气道阻塞患者对支气管扩张剂的反应模式。","authors":"S C Yang,&nbsp;M C Wu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To investigate the response pattern of patients with chronic airway obstruction (CAO) to bronchodilators, 128 subjects consisting of 80 men and 48 women with a mean age of 52.6 years were randomly tested with three inhalant bronchodilators: a non-selective beta-agonist (isoproterenol), a beta 2-selective agonist (terbutaline) and an anticholinergics (ipratropium) plus placebo. All patients had a baseline FEV/FVC of less than 65% and their clinical diagnosis were classified as either COPD or bronchial asthma according to the criteria of the ACCP-ATS Joint Committee on Pulmonary Nomenclature. The drugs were delivered to the patient via a metered dose inhaler (MDI) using the conventional inhalation technique. Spirometry was measured at regular intervals with a computerized pulmonary function analyzer CHESTAC-65(Japan). A more than 15% increase in FEV1 and/or FVC after treatment was regarded as responsive. While 108 patients were tested with a single drug, the remaining 20 patients were tested sequentially with terbutaline, ipratropium and placebo in a randomized cross-over manner for studying additivity. Our results showed that the response rates of asthmatic patients to isoproterenol, terbutaline and ipratropium were 50%, 87% and 67%, respectively. Only 27% of COPD patients responded to isoproterenol and 60% to terbutaline. On the other hand, ipratropium possessed a 61% response rate in the treatment of COPD and showed a bronchodilator effect independent to that of terbutaline. Combined use of both drugs resulted in additional improvement. Once patients responded to the drugs, apparent changes in FEV1 and/or FVC occurred within 30 minutes and reached the maximum usually at 60 minutes post-inhalation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":22189,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan yi xue hui za zhi. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","volume":"88 7","pages":"700-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The response pattern of patients with chronic airway obstruction to bronchodilators.\",\"authors\":\"S C Yang,&nbsp;M C Wu\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To investigate the response pattern of patients with chronic airway obstruction (CAO) to bronchodilators, 128 subjects consisting of 80 men and 48 women with a mean age of 52.6 years were randomly tested with three inhalant bronchodilators: a non-selective beta-agonist (isoproterenol), a beta 2-selective agonist (terbutaline) and an anticholinergics (ipratropium) plus placebo. All patients had a baseline FEV/FVC of less than 65% and their clinical diagnosis were classified as either COPD or bronchial asthma according to the criteria of the ACCP-ATS Joint Committee on Pulmonary Nomenclature. The drugs were delivered to the patient via a metered dose inhaler (MDI) using the conventional inhalation technique. Spirometry was measured at regular intervals with a computerized pulmonary function analyzer CHESTAC-65(Japan). A more than 15% increase in FEV1 and/or FVC after treatment was regarded as responsive. While 108 patients were tested with a single drug, the remaining 20 patients were tested sequentially with terbutaline, ipratropium and placebo in a randomized cross-over manner for studying additivity. Our results showed that the response rates of asthmatic patients to isoproterenol, terbutaline and ipratropium were 50%, 87% and 67%, respectively. Only 27% of COPD patients responded to isoproterenol and 60% to terbutaline. On the other hand, ipratropium possessed a 61% response rate in the treatment of COPD and showed a bronchodilator effect independent to that of terbutaline. Combined use of both drugs resulted in additional improvement. Once patients responded to the drugs, apparent changes in FEV1 and/or FVC occurred within 30 minutes and reached the maximum usually at 60 minutes post-inhalation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Taiwan yi xue hui za zhi. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"88 7\",\"pages\":\"700-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Taiwan yi xue hui za zhi. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan yi xue hui za zhi. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了研究慢性气道阻塞(CAO)患者对支气管扩张剂的反应模式,128名受试者,包括80名男性和48名女性,平均年龄52.6岁,随机接受三种吸入性支气管扩张剂的试验:非选择性β -受体激动剂(异丙肾上腺素),β - 2选择性受体激动剂(特布他林)和抗胆碱能剂(异丙托品)加安慰剂。所有患者的基线FEV/FVC均小于65%,根据ACCP-ATS肺命名联合委员会的标准,他们的临床诊断被分类为COPD或支气管哮喘。药物通过常规吸入技术的计量吸入器(MDI)输送给患者。用计算机化肺功能分析仪CHESTAC-65(日本)定期测量肺活量。治疗后FEV1和/或FVC增加15%以上被认为是反应性的。108例患者使用单一药物进行测试,其余20例患者以随机交叉的方式依次使用特布他林、异丙托品和安慰剂进行测试,以研究可加性。结果显示,哮喘患者对异丙肾上腺素、特布他林和异丙托品的有效率分别为50%、87%和67%。只有27%的COPD患者对异丙肾上腺素有反应,60%的患者对特布他林有反应。另一方面,异丙托品治疗COPD的有效率为61%,其支气管扩张作用独立于特布他林。两种药物联合使用可进一步改善病情。一旦患者对药物有反应,FEV1和/或FVC在30分钟内发生明显变化,通常在吸入后60分钟达到最大值。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The response pattern of patients with chronic airway obstruction to bronchodilators.

To investigate the response pattern of patients with chronic airway obstruction (CAO) to bronchodilators, 128 subjects consisting of 80 men and 48 women with a mean age of 52.6 years were randomly tested with three inhalant bronchodilators: a non-selective beta-agonist (isoproterenol), a beta 2-selective agonist (terbutaline) and an anticholinergics (ipratropium) plus placebo. All patients had a baseline FEV/FVC of less than 65% and their clinical diagnosis were classified as either COPD or bronchial asthma according to the criteria of the ACCP-ATS Joint Committee on Pulmonary Nomenclature. The drugs were delivered to the patient via a metered dose inhaler (MDI) using the conventional inhalation technique. Spirometry was measured at regular intervals with a computerized pulmonary function analyzer CHESTAC-65(Japan). A more than 15% increase in FEV1 and/or FVC after treatment was regarded as responsive. While 108 patients were tested with a single drug, the remaining 20 patients were tested sequentially with terbutaline, ipratropium and placebo in a randomized cross-over manner for studying additivity. Our results showed that the response rates of asthmatic patients to isoproterenol, terbutaline and ipratropium were 50%, 87% and 67%, respectively. Only 27% of COPD patients responded to isoproterenol and 60% to terbutaline. On the other hand, ipratropium possessed a 61% response rate in the treatment of COPD and showed a bronchodilator effect independent to that of terbutaline. Combined use of both drugs resulted in additional improvement. Once patients responded to the drugs, apparent changes in FEV1 and/or FVC occurred within 30 minutes and reached the maximum usually at 60 minutes post-inhalation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信