四川盆地梁戈山地层页岩油藏孔隙度表征方法研究

IF 2 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Shute Su, Liang Wang, Jun Li, Jing Lu, Yang Luo, Jun Jia
{"title":"四川盆地梁戈山地层页岩油藏孔隙度表征方法研究","authors":"Shute Su, Liang Wang, Jun Li, Jing Lu, Yang Luo, Jun Jia","doi":"10.3389/feart.2023.1325094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shale oil, an important component of unconventional oil and gas resources, mainly exists in the storage spaces such as shale pores, microfractures, etc. Porosity is commonly used to quantitatively describe the storage space of shale oil and is a key parameter in reservoir evaluation. However, there are significant differences in the results by existing experimental methods for porosity measurement, and moreover, it is difficult to compare the porosity obtained by the experimental measurement method with the logging calculation method. It is urgent to explore reasons for the differences in porosity measurement between various porosity experiments and logging calculations of the shale oil reservoir, and propose an effective method for shale oil reservoir to characterize porosity. In this research, core samples of shale oil reservoirs from the Lianggaoshan Formation of the Sichuan Basin were selected to measure the porosity by means of experimental methods including helium gas charging, saturation liquid method, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), etc. Meanwhile, porosity was calculated using the combination method of lithology scanning (LS) logging and conventional logging as well as the NMR logging method. Subsequently, porosity experimental results and logging calculation results were compared to clarify the applicability of various porosity characterization methods. The research results indicate that: 1) The porosity measurement results by the saturation liquid method and the NMR experimental method are close, both greater than that using the helium gas charging method; 2) The hydrogen signal of the dry-state sample is significant in the NMR experiment, mainly originating from organic matter and clay minerals; 3) The NMR short relaxation component in the water-saturated state primarily reflects the signal of organic matter and clay mineral matrix, while the long relaxation component reflects the pore fluid component; 4) After deducting the NMR signal of the dry-state core, the core NMR porosity measurement results under the water-saturated state agree well with that using the saturation liquid method, which is an indicative of effective reservoir porosity; 5) The NMR logging is limited by its echo spacing and cannot reflect the signal from organic matter and the crystal water in clay minerals at T<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> &amp;lt; 0.3 ms. Taken together, the porosity measurement method of subtracting the dry-state NMR signal from the water-saturated state NMR signal is considered effective and can be used to reflect the porosity of shale oil reservoirs in the Lianggaoshan Formation of the Sichuan Basin.","PeriodicalId":12359,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Earth Science","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on porosity characterization methods of shale oil reservoirs in Lianggaoshan Formation, Sichuan Basin\",\"authors\":\"Shute Su, Liang Wang, Jun Li, Jing Lu, Yang Luo, Jun Jia\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/feart.2023.1325094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Shale oil, an important component of unconventional oil and gas resources, mainly exists in the storage spaces such as shale pores, microfractures, etc. Porosity is commonly used to quantitatively describe the storage space of shale oil and is a key parameter in reservoir evaluation. However, there are significant differences in the results by existing experimental methods for porosity measurement, and moreover, it is difficult to compare the porosity obtained by the experimental measurement method with the logging calculation method. It is urgent to explore reasons for the differences in porosity measurement between various porosity experiments and logging calculations of the shale oil reservoir, and propose an effective method for shale oil reservoir to characterize porosity. In this research, core samples of shale oil reservoirs from the Lianggaoshan Formation of the Sichuan Basin were selected to measure the porosity by means of experimental methods including helium gas charging, saturation liquid method, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), etc. Meanwhile, porosity was calculated using the combination method of lithology scanning (LS) logging and conventional logging as well as the NMR logging method. Subsequently, porosity experimental results and logging calculation results were compared to clarify the applicability of various porosity characterization methods. The research results indicate that: 1) The porosity measurement results by the saturation liquid method and the NMR experimental method are close, both greater than that using the helium gas charging method; 2) The hydrogen signal of the dry-state sample is significant in the NMR experiment, mainly originating from organic matter and clay minerals; 3) The NMR short relaxation component in the water-saturated state primarily reflects the signal of organic matter and clay mineral matrix, while the long relaxation component reflects the pore fluid component; 4) After deducting the NMR signal of the dry-state core, the core NMR porosity measurement results under the water-saturated state agree well with that using the saturation liquid method, which is an indicative of effective reservoir porosity; 5) The NMR logging is limited by its echo spacing and cannot reflect the signal from organic matter and the crystal water in clay minerals at T<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> &amp;lt; 0.3 ms. Taken together, the porosity measurement method of subtracting the dry-state NMR signal from the water-saturated state NMR signal is considered effective and can be used to reflect the porosity of shale oil reservoirs in the Lianggaoshan Formation of the Sichuan Basin.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Earth Science\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Earth Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1325094\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Earth Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1325094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

页岩油是非常规油气资源的重要组成部分,主要存在于页岩孔隙、微裂缝等储集空间中。孔隙度通常用于定量描述页岩油的储集空间,是储层评价的关键参数。然而,现有的孔隙度实验测量方法得出的结果存在很大差异,而且实验测量方法与测井计算方法得出的孔隙度很难进行比较。探讨页岩油藏各种孔隙度实验和测井计算在孔隙度测量上存在差异的原因,提出页岩油藏孔隙度表征的有效方法迫在眉睫。本研究选取四川盆地梁戈山地层页岩油藏岩心样品,采用氦气充注法、饱和液法、核磁共振法等实验方法测量孔隙度。同时,采用岩性扫描(LS)测井和常规测井相结合的方法以及核磁共振测井方法计算孔隙度。随后,对孔隙度实验结果和测井计算结果进行了对比,以明确各种孔隙度表征方法的适用性。研究结果表明1)饱和液法和核磁共振实验法的孔隙度测量结果接近,均大于充氦气法;2)核磁共振实验中干态样品的氢信号显著,主要来源于有机质和粘土矿物;3)水饱和状态下的核磁共振短弛豫分量主要反映了有机质和粘土矿物基体的信号,而长弛豫分量则反映了孔隙流体分量;4)在扣除干态岩心的核磁共振信号后,水饱和状态下岩心核磁共振孔隙度测量结果与饱和液法测量结果吻合较好,是储层有效孔隙度的指示剂;5)核磁共振测井受其回波间距的限制,不能反映有机质和粘土矿物中晶体水在 T2 &lt; 0.3 ms。综上所述,从水饱和状态核磁共振信号中减去干态核磁共振信号的孔隙度测量方法是有效的,可用于反映四川盆地梁戈山地层页岩油藏的孔隙度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research on porosity characterization methods of shale oil reservoirs in Lianggaoshan Formation, Sichuan Basin
Shale oil, an important component of unconventional oil and gas resources, mainly exists in the storage spaces such as shale pores, microfractures, etc. Porosity is commonly used to quantitatively describe the storage space of shale oil and is a key parameter in reservoir evaluation. However, there are significant differences in the results by existing experimental methods for porosity measurement, and moreover, it is difficult to compare the porosity obtained by the experimental measurement method with the logging calculation method. It is urgent to explore reasons for the differences in porosity measurement between various porosity experiments and logging calculations of the shale oil reservoir, and propose an effective method for shale oil reservoir to characterize porosity. In this research, core samples of shale oil reservoirs from the Lianggaoshan Formation of the Sichuan Basin were selected to measure the porosity by means of experimental methods including helium gas charging, saturation liquid method, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), etc. Meanwhile, porosity was calculated using the combination method of lithology scanning (LS) logging and conventional logging as well as the NMR logging method. Subsequently, porosity experimental results and logging calculation results were compared to clarify the applicability of various porosity characterization methods. The research results indicate that: 1) The porosity measurement results by the saturation liquid method and the NMR experimental method are close, both greater than that using the helium gas charging method; 2) The hydrogen signal of the dry-state sample is significant in the NMR experiment, mainly originating from organic matter and clay minerals; 3) The NMR short relaxation component in the water-saturated state primarily reflects the signal of organic matter and clay mineral matrix, while the long relaxation component reflects the pore fluid component; 4) After deducting the NMR signal of the dry-state core, the core NMR porosity measurement results under the water-saturated state agree well with that using the saturation liquid method, which is an indicative of effective reservoir porosity; 5) The NMR logging is limited by its echo spacing and cannot reflect the signal from organic matter and the crystal water in clay minerals at T2 &lt; 0.3 ms. Taken together, the porosity measurement method of subtracting the dry-state NMR signal from the water-saturated state NMR signal is considered effective and can be used to reflect the porosity of shale oil reservoirs in the Lianggaoshan Formation of the Sichuan Basin.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Earth Science
Frontiers in Earth Science Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
2076
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Earth Science is an open-access journal that aims to bring together and publish on a single platform the best research dedicated to our planet. This platform hosts the rapidly growing and continuously expanding domains in Earth Science, involving the lithosphere (including the geosciences spectrum), the hydrosphere (including marine geosciences and hydrology, complementing the existing Frontiers journal on Marine Science) and the atmosphere (including meteorology and climatology). As such, Frontiers in Earth Science focuses on the countless processes operating within and among the major spheres constituting our planet. In turn, the understanding of these processes provides the theoretical background to better use the available resources and to face the major environmental challenges (including earthquakes, tsunamis, eruptions, floods, landslides, climate changes, extreme meteorological events): this is where interdependent processes meet, requiring a holistic view to better live on and with our planet. The journal welcomes outstanding contributions in any domain of Earth Science. The open-access model developed by Frontiers offers a fast, efficient, timely and dynamic alternative to traditional publication formats. The journal has 20 specialty sections at the first tier, each acting as an independent journal with a full editorial board. The traditional peer-review process is adapted to guarantee fairness and efficiency using a thorough paperless process, with real-time author-reviewer-editor interactions, collaborative reviewer mandates to maximize quality, and reviewer disclosure after article acceptance. While maintaining a rigorous peer-review, this system allows for a process whereby accepted articles are published online on average 90 days after submission. General Commentary articles as well as Book Reviews in Frontiers in Earth Science are only accepted upon invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信