抢花蜜者和模拟抢花蜜者对花蜜微生物群落的影响不同

IF 1.1 4区 生物学 Q4 ECOLOGY
Victoria J. Luizzi, Alison H. Harrington, Judith L. Bronstein, A. Elizabeth Arnold
{"title":"抢花蜜者和模拟抢花蜜者对花蜜微生物群落的影响不同","authors":"Victoria J. Luizzi, Alison H. Harrington, Judith L. Bronstein, A. Elizabeth Arnold","doi":"10.1111/1442-1984.12446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Floral nectar contains microbes that can influence nectar chemistry and pollinator visitation, and these microbial communities can be affected by pollinators in turn. Some flowers are also visited by nectar robbers, which feed on nectar through holes cut in floral tissue. If nectar robbers alter nectar microbial communities, they might have unexpected impacts on pollinator visitation. We investigated whether robbing could affect nectar microbial communities directly, by introducing microbes, or indirectly, by triggering a plant response to floral damage. We applied four treatments to flowers of <i>Tecoma</i> × “Orange Jubilee” (Bignoniaceae) in an arboretum setting: flowers were (1) covered to exclude all visitors; (2) available to both pollinators and nectar robbers and robbed naturally by carpenter bees; (3) available to pollinators only but cut at the base to simulate nectar robbing damage; or (4) available to pollinators only. We found that nectar in flowers accessible to any visitors was more likely to contain culturable microbes than flowers from which visitors were excluded. Microbial community composition and beta diversity were similar across treatments. Among flowers containing culturable microbes, flowers available to pollinators and nectar robbers had higher microbial abundance than flowers with simulated robbing, but there were no differences between flowers available to pollinators and robbers and unwounded flowers from which robbers were excluded. Overall, our results suggest that floral damage can affect some features of nectar microbial communities, but specific effects of nectar robbing are limited compared with the influence of visitation in general.","PeriodicalId":54601,"journal":{"name":"Plant Species Biology","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nectar robbers and simulated robbing differ in their effects on nectar microbial communities\",\"authors\":\"Victoria J. Luizzi, Alison H. Harrington, Judith L. Bronstein, A. Elizabeth Arnold\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1442-1984.12446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Floral nectar contains microbes that can influence nectar chemistry and pollinator visitation, and these microbial communities can be affected by pollinators in turn. Some flowers are also visited by nectar robbers, which feed on nectar through holes cut in floral tissue. If nectar robbers alter nectar microbial communities, they might have unexpected impacts on pollinator visitation. We investigated whether robbing could affect nectar microbial communities directly, by introducing microbes, or indirectly, by triggering a plant response to floral damage. We applied four treatments to flowers of <i>Tecoma</i> × “Orange Jubilee” (Bignoniaceae) in an arboretum setting: flowers were (1) covered to exclude all visitors; (2) available to both pollinators and nectar robbers and robbed naturally by carpenter bees; (3) available to pollinators only but cut at the base to simulate nectar robbing damage; or (4) available to pollinators only. We found that nectar in flowers accessible to any visitors was more likely to contain culturable microbes than flowers from which visitors were excluded. Microbial community composition and beta diversity were similar across treatments. Among flowers containing culturable microbes, flowers available to pollinators and nectar robbers had higher microbial abundance than flowers with simulated robbing, but there were no differences between flowers available to pollinators and robbers and unwounded flowers from which robbers were excluded. Overall, our results suggest that floral damage can affect some features of nectar microbial communities, but specific effects of nectar robbing are limited compared with the influence of visitation in general.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Species Biology\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Species Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1442-1984.12446\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Species Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1442-1984.12446","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

花蜜中的微生物会影响花蜜的化学成分和传粉昆虫的造访,这些微生物群落也会反过来受到传粉昆虫的影响。有些花朵还会受到盗蜜者的光顾,它们通过在花朵组织上开孔取食花蜜。如果盗花者改变了花蜜微生物群落,它们可能会对传粉昆虫的造访产生意想不到的影响。我们研究了盗花是否会通过引入微生物直接影响花蜜微生物群落,或通过引发植物对花朵损伤的反应间接影响花蜜微生物群落。我们对植物园中的 Tecoma × "Orange Jubilee"(Bignoniaceae)花进行了四种处理:(1) 遮盖花朵,排除所有访客;(2) 同时供传粉昆虫和采蜜蜂采蜜,并由木匠蜂自然采蜜;(3) 仅供传粉昆虫采蜜,但在基部剪断,以模拟采蜜蜂的采蜜行为;或 (4) 仅供传粉昆虫采蜜。我们发现,任何访客都能采到花蜜的花朵比访客被排除在外的花朵更有可能含有可培养的微生物。不同处理的微生物群落组成和贝塔多样性相似。在含有可培养微生物的花朵中,授粉者和采蜜者可采到的花朵比模拟采蜜者可采到的花朵微生物丰度更高,但授粉者和采蜜者可采到的花朵与采蜜者被排除在外的未受伤花朵之间没有差异。总之,我们的研究结果表明,花朵损伤会影响花蜜微生物群落的某些特征,但与一般访花的影响相比,盗花的具体影响是有限的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Nectar robbers and simulated robbing differ in their effects on nectar microbial communities

Nectar robbers and simulated robbing differ in their effects on nectar microbial communities
Floral nectar contains microbes that can influence nectar chemistry and pollinator visitation, and these microbial communities can be affected by pollinators in turn. Some flowers are also visited by nectar robbers, which feed on nectar through holes cut in floral tissue. If nectar robbers alter nectar microbial communities, they might have unexpected impacts on pollinator visitation. We investigated whether robbing could affect nectar microbial communities directly, by introducing microbes, or indirectly, by triggering a plant response to floral damage. We applied four treatments to flowers of Tecoma × “Orange Jubilee” (Bignoniaceae) in an arboretum setting: flowers were (1) covered to exclude all visitors; (2) available to both pollinators and nectar robbers and robbed naturally by carpenter bees; (3) available to pollinators only but cut at the base to simulate nectar robbing damage; or (4) available to pollinators only. We found that nectar in flowers accessible to any visitors was more likely to contain culturable microbes than flowers from which visitors were excluded. Microbial community composition and beta diversity were similar across treatments. Among flowers containing culturable microbes, flowers available to pollinators and nectar robbers had higher microbial abundance than flowers with simulated robbing, but there were no differences between flowers available to pollinators and robbers and unwounded flowers from which robbers were excluded. Overall, our results suggest that floral damage can affect some features of nectar microbial communities, but specific effects of nectar robbing are limited compared with the influence of visitation in general.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Species Biology
Plant Species Biology 生物-生态学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Plant Species Biology is published four times a year by The Society for the Study of Species Biology. Plant Species Biology publishes research manuscripts in the fields of population biology, pollination biology, evolutionary ecology, biosystematics, co-evolution, and any other related fields in biology. In addition to full length papers, the journal also includes short research papers as notes and comments. Invited articles may be accepted or occasion at the request of the Editorial Board. Manuscripts should contain new results of empirical and/or theoretical investigations concerning facts, processes, mechanisms or concepts of evolutionary as well as biological phenomena. Papers that are purely descriptive are not suitable for this journal. Notes & comments of the following contents will not be accepted for publication: Development of DNA markers. The journal is introducing ''Life history monographs of Japanese plant species''. The journal is dedicated to minimizing the time between submission, review and publication and to providing a high quality forum for original research in Plant Species Biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信