公众对异质环境政策的反应：基于利益诉求、实施成本和承诺机制的情景实验

IF 3.9 4区工程技术 Q2 Chemical Engineering

Energy Sources Part B-Economics Planning and Policy Pub Date : 2024-01-12 DOI:10.1080/15567249.2024.2304905

Liping Wang, Panpan Gao, Chuang Li

引用次数: 0

摘要

在 "碳峰值与碳中和 "的背景下，公众低碳行为的养成是环境改善的重要保障。对公众低碳行为的深入研究，将有助于我们更好地了解公众的低碳行为。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Public response to heterogeneous environmental policies: scenario-based experiments from interest appeal, implementation costs, and commitment mechanism

Under the background of “carbon peak and carbon neutrality,” the development of public low-carbon behavior is an important guarantee for environmental improvement. The in-depth study of public resp...

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Energy Sources Part B-Economics Planning and Policy 工程技术-能源与燃料

CiteScore

5.30

自引率

12.80%

发文量

审稿时长

1 months

期刊介绍： 12 issues per year Abstracted and/or indexed in: Applied Science & Technology Index; API Abstracts/Literature; Automatic Subject Index Citation; BIOSIS Previews; Cabell’s Directory of Publishing Opportunities in Economics and Finance; Chemical Abstracts; CSA Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts; CSA Environmental Sciences & Pollution Management Database; CSA Pollution Abstracts; Current Contents/Engineering, Technology & Applied Sciences; Directory of Industry Data Sources; Economic Abstracts; Electrical and Electronics Abstracts; Energy Information Abstracts; Energy Research Abstracts; Engineering Index Monthly; Environmental Abstracts; Environmental Periodicals Bibliography (EPB); International Abstracts in Operations Research; Operations/Research/Management Science Abstracts; Petroleum Abstracts; Physikalische Berichte; and Science Citation Index. Taylor & Francis make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in our publications. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor & Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to, or arising out of the use of the Content. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions .