因袖带侵蚀导致人工尿道括约肌切除术后的尿道管理。

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Central European Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-08 DOI:10.5173/ceju.2023.132
Łukasz Białek, Mikołaj Frankiewicz, Jan Adamowicz, Felix Campos-Juanatey, Andrea Cocci, Guglielmo Mantica, Clemens M Rosenbaum, Wesley Verla, Marjan Waterloos, Malte W Vetterlein
{"title":"因袖带侵蚀导致人工尿道括约肌切除术后的尿道管理。","authors":"Łukasz Białek, Mikołaj Frankiewicz, Jan Adamowicz, Felix Campos-Juanatey, Andrea Cocci, Guglielmo Mantica, Clemens M Rosenbaum, Wesley Verla, Marjan Waterloos, Malte W Vetterlein","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The artificial urethral sphincter (AUS) is the gold standard treatment in cases of moderate-to-severe stress urinary incontinence in males. Cuff erosions are one of the most important distant complications of AUS implantation. The optimal urethral management has still not been established.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Search terms related to 'urethral stricture', 'artificial urinary sphincter', and 'cuff erosion' were used in the PubMed database to identify relevant articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this mini review we identified 6 original articles that assessed the urethral management after AUS explantation due to cuff erosion and included urinary diversion by transurethral and/or suprapubic catheterization, urethrorrhaphy, and <i>in situ</i> urethroplasty. We summarized the results of different management methods and their efficacy in terms of preventing urethral stricture formation. We highlight the need for better-quality evidence on this topic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The available data do not provide a clear answer to the question of optimal urethral management during AUS explantation. There is a great need to provide higher-quality evidence on this topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10789282/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urethral management after artificial urinary sphincter explantation due to cuff erosion.\",\"authors\":\"Łukasz Białek, Mikołaj Frankiewicz, Jan Adamowicz, Felix Campos-Juanatey, Andrea Cocci, Guglielmo Mantica, Clemens M Rosenbaum, Wesley Verla, Marjan Waterloos, Malte W Vetterlein\",\"doi\":\"10.5173/ceju.2023.132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The artificial urethral sphincter (AUS) is the gold standard treatment in cases of moderate-to-severe stress urinary incontinence in males. Cuff erosions are one of the most important distant complications of AUS implantation. The optimal urethral management has still not been established.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Search terms related to 'urethral stricture', 'artificial urinary sphincter', and 'cuff erosion' were used in the PubMed database to identify relevant articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this mini review we identified 6 original articles that assessed the urethral management after AUS explantation due to cuff erosion and included urinary diversion by transurethral and/or suprapubic catheterization, urethrorrhaphy, and <i>in situ</i> urethroplasty. We summarized the results of different management methods and their efficacy in terms of preventing urethral stricture formation. We highlight the need for better-quality evidence on this topic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The available data do not provide a clear answer to the question of optimal urethral management during AUS explantation. There is a great need to provide higher-quality evidence on this topic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central European Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10789282/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central European Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:人工尿道括约肌(AUS)是治疗男性中重度压力性尿失禁的金标准。袖带侵蚀是人工尿道括约肌植入术最重要的远期并发症之一。最佳尿道处理方法尚未确定:在 PubMed 数据库中使用与 "尿道狭窄"、"人工尿道括约肌 "和 "袖带侵蚀 "相关的关键词进行搜索,以确定相关文章:在这篇微型综述中,我们发现了 6 篇原创文章,这些文章评估了因袖带侵蚀而导致 AUS 剥离后的尿道处理方法,包括经尿道和/或耻骨上导尿术、尿道成形术和原位尿道成形术的尿流改道。我们总结了不同处理方法的结果及其在预防尿道狭窄形成方面的功效。我们强调在这一问题上需要更高质量的证据:结论:现有数据并不能明确回答 AUS 移植过程中的最佳尿道管理问题。我们亟需就这一问题提供更高质量的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Urethral management after artificial urinary sphincter explantation due to cuff erosion.

Introduction: The artificial urethral sphincter (AUS) is the gold standard treatment in cases of moderate-to-severe stress urinary incontinence in males. Cuff erosions are one of the most important distant complications of AUS implantation. The optimal urethral management has still not been established.

Material and methods: Search terms related to 'urethral stricture', 'artificial urinary sphincter', and 'cuff erosion' were used in the PubMed database to identify relevant articles.

Results: In this mini review we identified 6 original articles that assessed the urethral management after AUS explantation due to cuff erosion and included urinary diversion by transurethral and/or suprapubic catheterization, urethrorrhaphy, and in situ urethroplasty. We summarized the results of different management methods and their efficacy in terms of preventing urethral stricture formation. We highlight the need for better-quality evidence on this topic.

Conclusions: The available data do not provide a clear answer to the question of optimal urethral management during AUS explantation. There is a great need to provide higher-quality evidence on this topic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Urology
Central European Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信