泼尼松和甲氨蝶呤联合治疗与泼尼松单独治疗对巨细胞动脉炎实验室指标的影响

IF 1.2 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY
Ines Perez-Sancristobal , Paula Alvarez-Hernandez , Cristina Lajas-Petisco , Benjamin Fernandez-Gutierrez
{"title":"泼尼松和甲氨蝶呤联合治疗与泼尼松单独治疗对巨细胞动脉炎实验室指标的影响","authors":"Ines Perez-Sancristobal ,&nbsp;Paula Alvarez-Hernandez ,&nbsp;Cristina Lajas-Petisco ,&nbsp;Benjamin Fernandez-Gutierrez","doi":"10.1016/j.reuma.2023.09.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare the effect of combined treatment with prednisone and methotrexate (MTX) versus prednisone alone over laboratory parameters in giant cell arteritis (GCA).</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p><span>We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial about usefulness of treatment with prednisone and MTX versus prednisone and placebo in GCA (Ann Intern Med 2001;134:106–114). As a part of follow-up of patients (</span><em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->42), we performed laboratory analysis in 20 time points during the two-year period of follow-up. To analyze differences, we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), hemoglobin, and platelets, and compared the results in both groups adjusting by time of follow-up, existence of relapses and dose of prednisone.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 724 laboratory measurements were done. Median value of ESR was 33 [18–56] in patients with placebo and 26 [15–44] in patients with MTX (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.0002). No significant differences were observed in ESR during relapses. The mean ESR value followed a parallel course in both groups, but was lower in the group with MTX than in the group with placebo in 18 of 20 time points of follow-up. The AUC of ESR by time of follow-up was 28,461.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->12,326 in the group with placebo and 19,598.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->8,117 in the group with MTX (mean difference 8,863, 95% CI 1.542–16.184; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.019). The course of other laboratory parameters paralleled, without statistical significance, those observed for ESR.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These data, along with clinical data, suggest that MTX might play a role as a disease-modifying agent in the treatment of GCA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47115,"journal":{"name":"Reumatologia Clinica","volume":"20 2","pages":"Pages 108-112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of combined treatment with prednisone and methotrexate versus prednisone alone over laboratory parameters in giant cell arteritis\",\"authors\":\"Ines Perez-Sancristobal ,&nbsp;Paula Alvarez-Hernandez ,&nbsp;Cristina Lajas-Petisco ,&nbsp;Benjamin Fernandez-Gutierrez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.reuma.2023.09.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare the effect of combined treatment with prednisone and methotrexate (MTX) versus prednisone alone over laboratory parameters in giant cell arteritis (GCA).</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p><span>We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial about usefulness of treatment with prednisone and MTX versus prednisone and placebo in GCA (Ann Intern Med 2001;134:106–114). As a part of follow-up of patients (</span><em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->42), we performed laboratory analysis in 20 time points during the two-year period of follow-up. To analyze differences, we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), hemoglobin, and platelets, and compared the results in both groups adjusting by time of follow-up, existence of relapses and dose of prednisone.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 724 laboratory measurements were done. Median value of ESR was 33 [18–56] in patients with placebo and 26 [15–44] in patients with MTX (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.0002). No significant differences were observed in ESR during relapses. The mean ESR value followed a parallel course in both groups, but was lower in the group with MTX than in the group with placebo in 18 of 20 time points of follow-up. The AUC of ESR by time of follow-up was 28,461.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->12,326 in the group with placebo and 19,598.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->8,117 in the group with MTX (mean difference 8,863, 95% CI 1.542–16.184; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.019). The course of other laboratory parameters paralleled, without statistical significance, those observed for ESR.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These data, along with clinical data, suggest that MTX might play a role as a disease-modifying agent in the treatment of GCA.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reumatologia Clinica\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 108-112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reumatologia Clinica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1699258X2300205X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reumatologia Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1699258X2300205X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较泼尼松和甲氨蝶呤(MTX)联合治疗与泼尼松单独治疗对巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)患者实验室指标的影响。患者和方法我们就泼尼松和 MTX 与泼尼松和安慰剂治疗 GCA 的有效性进行了一项双盲、安慰剂对照随机临床试验(Ann Intern Med 2001;134:106-114)。作为患者(42 人)随访的一部分,我们在两年随访期间的 20 个时间点进行了实验室分析。为了分析差异,我们计算了红细胞沉降率(ESR)、血红蛋白和血小板的曲线下面积(AUC),并根据随访时间、是否复发和泼尼松剂量对两组结果进行了比较。安慰剂患者的血沉中位值为 33 [18-56],MTX 患者的血沉中位值为 26 [15-44](P = 0.0002)。复发期间的血沉无明显差异。两组患者的 ESR 平均值呈平行变化,但在 20 个随访时间点中,有 18 个时间点 MTX 组的 ESR 值低于安慰剂组。按随访时间计算,安慰剂组的 ESR AUC 为 28,461.7 ± 12,326,MTX 组为 19,598.4 ± 8,117 (平均差异为 8,863, 95% CI 1.542-16.184; P = 0.019)。这些数据以及临床数据表明,MTX 可在 GCA 的治疗中发挥疾病调节剂的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of combined treatment with prednisone and methotrexate versus prednisone alone over laboratory parameters in giant cell arteritis

Objective

To compare the effect of combined treatment with prednisone and methotrexate (MTX) versus prednisone alone over laboratory parameters in giant cell arteritis (GCA).

Patients and methods

We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial about usefulness of treatment with prednisone and MTX versus prednisone and placebo in GCA (Ann Intern Med 2001;134:106–114). As a part of follow-up of patients (n = 42), we performed laboratory analysis in 20 time points during the two-year period of follow-up. To analyze differences, we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), hemoglobin, and platelets, and compared the results in both groups adjusting by time of follow-up, existence of relapses and dose of prednisone.

Results

A total of 724 laboratory measurements were done. Median value of ESR was 33 [18–56] in patients with placebo and 26 [15–44] in patients with MTX (P = 0.0002). No significant differences were observed in ESR during relapses. The mean ESR value followed a parallel course in both groups, but was lower in the group with MTX than in the group with placebo in 18 of 20 time points of follow-up. The AUC of ESR by time of follow-up was 28,461.7 ± 12,326 in the group with placebo and 19,598.4 ± 8,117 in the group with MTX (mean difference 8,863, 95% CI 1.542–16.184; P = 0.019). The course of other laboratory parameters paralleled, without statistical significance, those observed for ESR.

Conclusions

These data, along with clinical data, suggest that MTX might play a role as a disease-modifying agent in the treatment of GCA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reumatologia Clinica
Reumatologia Clinica RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Una gran revista para cubrir eficazmente las necesidades de conocimientos en una patología de etiología, expresividad clínica y tratamiento tan amplios. Además es La Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología y del Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología y está incluida en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信