Sanghyun Lee, Juyeong Kim, Pankee Bae, Sangmin Lee, Hojin Kim
{"title":"基于强度直方图的可靠珠基荧光免疫分析图像分析方法","authors":"Sanghyun Lee, Juyeong Kim, Pankee Bae, Sangmin Lee, Hojin Kim","doi":"10.1007/s13206-023-00137-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bead-based fluorescence immunoassay is drawing attention as a next-generation technology in disease diagnosis owing to its high sensitivity and multiplexing capability. Fluorescence imaging of beads is typically used to determine their mean fluorescence intensity. However, the mean intensity can be evaluated differently depending on the analysis methods [such as the shape and size of the region of interest (ROI)]. To address these problems, this study proposes a highly reliable and reproducible image analysis method utilizing a fluorescence intensity-based effective pixel extraction technique. Various potential sources of defective signals (e.g., fluorescence aggregation, non-specific antigen–antibody reactions, and bead defects) can be prevented from contributing to the average value by selectively extracting pixels representing the specific reactions of antigens and antibodies in the ROI. In this study, we fabricated a microfluidic chip composed of multiple bead-based detection lines, performed fluorescence immunoassay, and then compared the mean fluorescence intensity calculated from the fluorescence images with that of a conventional analysis method. Using the conventional method, the evaluated average mean intensity value of beads varied significantly based on the size of the ROI with the coefficients of variation ranging from approximately 29–95%. In contrast, the effective pixel extraction method resulted in a coefficient of variation of approximately 3–7% under varying ROI size. Furthermore, the coefficients of variation for four detection lines containing various types of defective signals significantly decreased from approximately 7.1% to 2.6%. The proposed technique will help in minimizing the analysis deviation caused by different ROI selections or defective signals in fluorescent image-based immunoassays.</p>","PeriodicalId":8768,"journal":{"name":"BioChip Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intensity Histogram-Based Reliable Image Analysis Method for Bead-Based Fluorescence Immunoassay\",\"authors\":\"Sanghyun Lee, Juyeong Kim, Pankee Bae, Sangmin Lee, Hojin Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13206-023-00137-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Bead-based fluorescence immunoassay is drawing attention as a next-generation technology in disease diagnosis owing to its high sensitivity and multiplexing capability. Fluorescence imaging of beads is typically used to determine their mean fluorescence intensity. However, the mean intensity can be evaluated differently depending on the analysis methods [such as the shape and size of the region of interest (ROI)]. To address these problems, this study proposes a highly reliable and reproducible image analysis method utilizing a fluorescence intensity-based effective pixel extraction technique. Various potential sources of defective signals (e.g., fluorescence aggregation, non-specific antigen–antibody reactions, and bead defects) can be prevented from contributing to the average value by selectively extracting pixels representing the specific reactions of antigens and antibodies in the ROI. In this study, we fabricated a microfluidic chip composed of multiple bead-based detection lines, performed fluorescence immunoassay, and then compared the mean fluorescence intensity calculated from the fluorescence images with that of a conventional analysis method. Using the conventional method, the evaluated average mean intensity value of beads varied significantly based on the size of the ROI with the coefficients of variation ranging from approximately 29–95%. In contrast, the effective pixel extraction method resulted in a coefficient of variation of approximately 3–7% under varying ROI size. Furthermore, the coefficients of variation for four detection lines containing various types of defective signals significantly decreased from approximately 7.1% to 2.6%. The proposed technique will help in minimizing the analysis deviation caused by different ROI selections or defective signals in fluorescent image-based immunoassays.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BioChip Journal\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BioChip Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13206-023-00137-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioChip Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13206-023-00137-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
基于微珠的荧光免疫测定因其高灵敏度和多路复用能力而作为下一代疾病诊断技术备受关注。珠子的荧光成像通常用于确定其平均荧光强度。然而,平均强度的评估会因分析方法(如感兴趣区(ROI)的形状和大小)的不同而不同。为了解决这些问题,本研究利用基于荧光强度的有效像素提取技术,提出了一种高度可靠、可重复的图像分析方法。通过有选择性地提取 ROI 中代表抗原和抗体特异性反应的像素,可以防止各种潜在的缺陷信号源(如荧光聚集、非特异性抗原抗体反应和珠子缺陷)对平均值的贡献。在这项研究中,我们制作了一个由多条微珠检测线组成的微流控芯片,进行了荧光免疫测定,然后将从荧光图像中计算出的平均荧光强度与传统分析方法进行了比较。使用传统方法时,根据 ROI 的大小,评估出的珠子平均平均强度值变化很大,变异系数约为 29-95%。相比之下,有效像素提取法在 ROI 大小不同的情况下,变异系数约为 3-7%。此外,包含各类缺陷信号的四条检测线的变异系数从约 7.1% 显著降至 2.6%。所提出的技术将有助于在基于荧光图像的免疫测定中最大限度地减少因不同 ROI 选择或缺陷信号造成的分析偏差。
Intensity Histogram-Based Reliable Image Analysis Method for Bead-Based Fluorescence Immunoassay
Bead-based fluorescence immunoassay is drawing attention as a next-generation technology in disease diagnosis owing to its high sensitivity and multiplexing capability. Fluorescence imaging of beads is typically used to determine their mean fluorescence intensity. However, the mean intensity can be evaluated differently depending on the analysis methods [such as the shape and size of the region of interest (ROI)]. To address these problems, this study proposes a highly reliable and reproducible image analysis method utilizing a fluorescence intensity-based effective pixel extraction technique. Various potential sources of defective signals (e.g., fluorescence aggregation, non-specific antigen–antibody reactions, and bead defects) can be prevented from contributing to the average value by selectively extracting pixels representing the specific reactions of antigens and antibodies in the ROI. In this study, we fabricated a microfluidic chip composed of multiple bead-based detection lines, performed fluorescence immunoassay, and then compared the mean fluorescence intensity calculated from the fluorescence images with that of a conventional analysis method. Using the conventional method, the evaluated average mean intensity value of beads varied significantly based on the size of the ROI with the coefficients of variation ranging from approximately 29–95%. In contrast, the effective pixel extraction method resulted in a coefficient of variation of approximately 3–7% under varying ROI size. Furthermore, the coefficients of variation for four detection lines containing various types of defective signals significantly decreased from approximately 7.1% to 2.6%. The proposed technique will help in minimizing the analysis deviation caused by different ROI selections or defective signals in fluorescent image-based immunoassays.
期刊介绍:
BioChip Journal publishes original research and reviews in all areas of the biochip technology in the following disciplines, including protein chip, DNA chip, cell chip, lab-on-a-chip, bio-MEMS, biosensor, micro/nano mechanics, microfluidics, high-throughput screening technology, medical science, genomics, proteomics, bioinformatics, medical diagnostics, environmental monitoring and micro/nanotechnology. The Journal is committed to rapid peer review to ensure the publication of highest quality original research and timely news and review articles.