血液学指标的联合检测可用于结直肠癌和良性结直肠病变的鉴别诊断。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Xuan Zhang, Yang-Yang Wu, Yuan-Yuan Qin, Fa-Quan Lin
{"title":"血液学指标的联合检测可用于结直肠癌和良性结直肠病变的鉴别诊断。","authors":"Xuan Zhang, Yang-Yang Wu, Yuan-Yuan Qin, Fa-Quan Lin","doi":"10.3233/CBM-230157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article aims to investigate the clinical value of hemoglobin/red cell distribution width ratio (Hb/RDW), C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) and plateletcrit (PCT) combined with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in colorectal cancer (CRC) auxiliary diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed in 718 subjects (212 with CRC, 209 with benign colorectal lesions (BCL), 111 with other cancers, and 186 healthy controls).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CAR, PCT, and CEA in the CRC group were higher than those in the BCL, other cancers, and the healthy control group. However, Hb/RDW in the CRC group was lower than the other three groups. Moreover, there were significant differences in Hb/RDW and CEA among different T-N-M stages (all P< 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression showed that low level of Hb/RDW and high level of CAR, CEA, PCT were risk factors for CRC, and are correlated with CRC stage. Additionally, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of Hb/RDW+CEA (AUC: 0.735), CAR+CEA (AUC: 0.748), PCT+CEA (AUC: 0.807) was larger than that of Hb/RDW (AUC: 0.503), CAR (AUC: 0.614), or PCT (AUC: 0.713) alone (all P< 0.001) in distinguishing CRC from BCL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hb/RDW, CAR, PCT, and CEA are independent risk factors for CRC. Hb/RDW, CAR, and PCT combined with CEA have significant value for auxiliary differential diagnosis of CRC and BCL.</p>","PeriodicalId":56320,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Biomarkers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11091605/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The combined detection of hematological indicators is used for the differential diagnosis of colorectal cancer and benign-colorectal lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Xuan Zhang, Yang-Yang Wu, Yuan-Yuan Qin, Fa-Quan Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/CBM-230157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article aims to investigate the clinical value of hemoglobin/red cell distribution width ratio (Hb/RDW), C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) and plateletcrit (PCT) combined with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in colorectal cancer (CRC) auxiliary diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed in 718 subjects (212 with CRC, 209 with benign colorectal lesions (BCL), 111 with other cancers, and 186 healthy controls).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CAR, PCT, and CEA in the CRC group were higher than those in the BCL, other cancers, and the healthy control group. However, Hb/RDW in the CRC group was lower than the other three groups. Moreover, there were significant differences in Hb/RDW and CEA among different T-N-M stages (all P< 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression showed that low level of Hb/RDW and high level of CAR, CEA, PCT were risk factors for CRC, and are correlated with CRC stage. Additionally, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of Hb/RDW+CEA (AUC: 0.735), CAR+CEA (AUC: 0.748), PCT+CEA (AUC: 0.807) was larger than that of Hb/RDW (AUC: 0.503), CAR (AUC: 0.614), or PCT (AUC: 0.713) alone (all P< 0.001) in distinguishing CRC from BCL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hb/RDW, CAR, PCT, and CEA are independent risk factors for CRC. Hb/RDW, CAR, and PCT combined with CEA have significant value for auxiliary differential diagnosis of CRC and BCL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Biomarkers\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11091605/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Biomarkers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/CBM-230157\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/CBM-230157","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本文旨在探讨血红蛋白/红细胞分布宽度比值(Hb/RDW)、C反应蛋白/白蛋白比值(CAR)和血小板比值(PCT)结合癌胚抗原(CEA)在结直肠癌(CRC)辅助诊断中的临床价值:我们对718名受试者(212名CRC患者、209名良性结直肠病变(BCL)患者、111名其他癌症患者和186名健康对照组)进行了回顾性分析:结果:CRC 组的 CAR、PCT 和 CEA 均高于 BCL、其他癌症和健康对照组。但 CRC 组的 Hb/RDW 低于其他三组。此外,Hb/RDW和CEA在不同的T-N-M分期之间存在明显差异(均P< 0.05)。多变量逻辑回归显示,低水平的 Hb/RDW 和高水平的 CAR、CEA、PCT 是 CRC 的危险因素,并与 CRC 分期相关。此外,在区分 CRC 和 BCL 方面,Hb/RDW+CEA(AUC:0.735)、CAR+CEA(AUC:0.748)、PCT+CEA(AUC:0.807)的接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)均大于 Hb/RDW(AUC:0.503)、CAR(AUC:0.614)或 PCT(AUC:0.713)(均 P<0.001):结论:Hb/RDW、CAR、PCT 和 CEA 是 CRC 的独立危险因素。结论:Hb/RDW、CAR、PCT 和 CEA 是 CRC 的独立危险因素,Hb/RDW、CAR 和 PCT 与 CEA 结合使用对辅助鉴别诊断 CRC 和 BCL 有重要价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The combined detection of hematological indicators is used for the differential diagnosis of colorectal cancer and benign-colorectal lesions.

Objective: This article aims to investigate the clinical value of hemoglobin/red cell distribution width ratio (Hb/RDW), C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) and plateletcrit (PCT) combined with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in colorectal cancer (CRC) auxiliary diagnosis.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed in 718 subjects (212 with CRC, 209 with benign colorectal lesions (BCL), 111 with other cancers, and 186 healthy controls).

Results: The CAR, PCT, and CEA in the CRC group were higher than those in the BCL, other cancers, and the healthy control group. However, Hb/RDW in the CRC group was lower than the other three groups. Moreover, there were significant differences in Hb/RDW and CEA among different T-N-M stages (all P< 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression showed that low level of Hb/RDW and high level of CAR, CEA, PCT were risk factors for CRC, and are correlated with CRC stage. Additionally, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of Hb/RDW+CEA (AUC: 0.735), CAR+CEA (AUC: 0.748), PCT+CEA (AUC: 0.807) was larger than that of Hb/RDW (AUC: 0.503), CAR (AUC: 0.614), or PCT (AUC: 0.713) alone (all P< 0.001) in distinguishing CRC from BCL.

Conclusions: Hb/RDW, CAR, PCT, and CEA are independent risk factors for CRC. Hb/RDW, CAR, and PCT combined with CEA have significant value for auxiliary differential diagnosis of CRC and BCL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Biomarkers
Cancer Biomarkers ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
195
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Concentrating on molecular biomarkers in cancer research, Cancer Biomarkers publishes original research findings (and reviews solicited by the editor) on the subject of the identification of markers associated with the disease processes whether or not they are an integral part of the pathological lesion. The disease markers may include, but are not limited to, genomic, epigenomic, proteomics, cellular and morphologic, and genetic factors predisposing to the disease or indicating the occurrence of the disease. Manuscripts on these factors or biomarkers, either in altered forms, abnormal concentrations or with abnormal tissue distribution leading to disease causation will be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信