Stefan Hunsche, Dieter Fedders, Alexandra Hellerbach, Markus Eichner, Jochen Wirths, Till A Dembek, Veerle Visser-Vandewalle, Harald Treuer
{"title":"用于确定 DBS 导联方向的通用算法:将二维和三维 X 射线技术应用于 SenSightTM 导联。","authors":"Stefan Hunsche, Dieter Fedders, Alexandra Hellerbach, Markus Eichner, Jochen Wirths, Till A Dembek, Veerle Visser-Vandewalle, Harald Treuer","doi":"10.1159/000535716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With recent advancements in deep brain stimulation (DBS), directional leads featuring segmented contacts have been introduced, allowing for targeted stimulation of specific brain regions. Given that manufacturers employ diverse markers for lead orientation, our investigation focuses on the adaptability of the 2017 techniques proposed by the Cologne research group for lead orientation determination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We tailored the two separate 2D and 3D X-ray-based techniques published in 2017 and originally developed for C-shaped markers, to the dual-marker of the Medtronic SenSight™ lead. In a retrospective patient study, we evaluated their feasibility and consistency by comparing the degree of agreement between the two methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Bland-Altman plot showed favorable concordance without any noticeable systematic errors. The mean difference was 0.79°, with limits of agreement spanning from 21.4° to -19.8°. The algorithms demonstrated high reliability, evidenced by an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.99 (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 2D and 3D algorithms, initially formulated for discerning the circular orientation of a C-shaped marker, were adapted to the marker of the Medtronic SenSight™ lead. Statistical analyses revealed a significant level of agreement between the two methods. Our findings highlight the adaptability of these algorithms to different markers, achievable through both low-dose intraoperative 2D X-ray imaging and standard CT imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10997254/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"General Algorithm Applicability in Determining DBS Lead Orientation: Adapting 2D and 3D X-Ray Techniques for SenSightTM Leads.\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Hunsche, Dieter Fedders, Alexandra Hellerbach, Markus Eichner, Jochen Wirths, Till A Dembek, Veerle Visser-Vandewalle, Harald Treuer\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000535716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With recent advancements in deep brain stimulation (DBS), directional leads featuring segmented contacts have been introduced, allowing for targeted stimulation of specific brain regions. Given that manufacturers employ diverse markers for lead orientation, our investigation focuses on the adaptability of the 2017 techniques proposed by the Cologne research group for lead orientation determination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We tailored the two separate 2D and 3D X-ray-based techniques published in 2017 and originally developed for C-shaped markers, to the dual-marker of the Medtronic SenSight™ lead. In a retrospective patient study, we evaluated their feasibility and consistency by comparing the degree of agreement between the two methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Bland-Altman plot showed favorable concordance without any noticeable systematic errors. The mean difference was 0.79°, with limits of agreement spanning from 21.4° to -19.8°. The algorithms demonstrated high reliability, evidenced by an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.99 (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 2D and 3D algorithms, initially formulated for discerning the circular orientation of a C-shaped marker, were adapted to the marker of the Medtronic SenSight™ lead. Statistical analyses revealed a significant level of agreement between the two methods. Our findings highlight the adaptability of these algorithms to different markers, achievable through both low-dose intraoperative 2D X-ray imaging and standard CT imaging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10997254/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535716\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535716","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:随着脑深部刺激(DBS)技术的不断进步,具有分段触点的定向导线应运而生,可对特定脑区进行定向刺激。鉴于制造商采用不同的标记来确定导线方向,我们的研究重点是科隆研究小组 2017 年提出的导线方向确定技术的适应性:我们将 2017 年发布的两种基于二维和三维 X 射线的独立技术(最初是针对 C 形标记开发的)调整用于美敦力 SenSight™ 导联的双标记。在一项回顾性患者研究中,我们通过比较两种方法的一致程度,评估了它们的可行性和一致性:结果:布兰-阿尔特曼图显示出良好的一致性,没有任何明显的系统误差。平均差异为 0.79°,一致度范围为 21.4°至 -19.8°。算法的可靠性很高,类内相关系数为 0.99(p < 0.001):二维和三维算法最初是为辨别 C 形标记物的圆形方向而制定的,现已适用于美敦力 SenSight™ 导联的标记物。统计分析显示,这两种方法之间的一致性达到了很高的水平。我们的研究结果凸显了这些算法对不同标记物的适应性,可通过术中低剂量二维 X 光成像和标准 CT 成像实现。
General Algorithm Applicability in Determining DBS Lead Orientation: Adapting 2D and 3D X-Ray Techniques for SenSightTM Leads.
Introduction: With recent advancements in deep brain stimulation (DBS), directional leads featuring segmented contacts have been introduced, allowing for targeted stimulation of specific brain regions. Given that manufacturers employ diverse markers for lead orientation, our investigation focuses on the adaptability of the 2017 techniques proposed by the Cologne research group for lead orientation determination.
Methods: We tailored the two separate 2D and 3D X-ray-based techniques published in 2017 and originally developed for C-shaped markers, to the dual-marker of the Medtronic SenSight™ lead. In a retrospective patient study, we evaluated their feasibility and consistency by comparing the degree of agreement between the two methods.
Results: The Bland-Altman plot showed favorable concordance without any noticeable systematic errors. The mean difference was 0.79°, with limits of agreement spanning from 21.4° to -19.8°. The algorithms demonstrated high reliability, evidenced by an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.99 (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: The 2D and 3D algorithms, initially formulated for discerning the circular orientation of a C-shaped marker, were adapted to the marker of the Medtronic SenSight™ lead. Statistical analyses revealed a significant level of agreement between the two methods. Our findings highlight the adaptability of these algorithms to different markers, achievable through both low-dose intraoperative 2D X-ray imaging and standard CT imaging.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.