利用诊断相关组内的病例混合指数评估一家大型学术医疗中心的住院费用差异。

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium Pub Date : 2024-01-11 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01
Selina Pi, Jonathan Masterson, Stephen P Ma, Conor K Corbin, Arnold Milstein, Jonathan H Chen
{"title":"利用诊断相关组内的病例混合指数评估一家大型学术医疗中心的住院费用差异。","authors":"Selina Pi, Jonathan Masterson, Stephen P Ma, Conor K Corbin, Arnold Milstein, Jonathan H Chen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In analyzing direct hospitalization cost and clinical data from an academic medical center, commonly used metrics such as diagnosis-related group (DRG) weight explain approximately 37% of cost variability, but a substantial amount of variation remains unaccounted for by case mix index (CMI) alone. Using CMI as a benchmark, we isolate and target individual DRGs with higher than expected average costs for specific quality improvement efforts. While DRGs summarize hospitalization care after discharge, a predictive model using only information known before admission explained up to 60% of cost variability for two DRGs with a high excess cost burden. This level of variability likely reflects underlying patient factors that are not modifiable (e.g., age and prior comorbidities) and therefore less useful for health systems to target for intervention. However, the remaining unexplained variation can be inspected in further studies to discover operational factors that health systems can target to improve quality and value for their patients. Since DRG weights represent the expected resource consumption for a specific hospitalization type relative to the average hospitalization, the data-driven approach we demonstrate can be utilized by any health institution to quantify excess costs and potential savings among DRGs.</p>","PeriodicalId":72180,"journal":{"name":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","volume":"2023 ","pages":"1201-1208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10785921/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Case Mix Index within Diagnosis-Related Groups to Evaluate Variation in Hospitalization Costs at a Large Academic Medical Center.\",\"authors\":\"Selina Pi, Jonathan Masterson, Stephen P Ma, Conor K Corbin, Arnold Milstein, Jonathan H Chen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In analyzing direct hospitalization cost and clinical data from an academic medical center, commonly used metrics such as diagnosis-related group (DRG) weight explain approximately 37% of cost variability, but a substantial amount of variation remains unaccounted for by case mix index (CMI) alone. Using CMI as a benchmark, we isolate and target individual DRGs with higher than expected average costs for specific quality improvement efforts. While DRGs summarize hospitalization care after discharge, a predictive model using only information known before admission explained up to 60% of cost variability for two DRGs with a high excess cost burden. This level of variability likely reflects underlying patient factors that are not modifiable (e.g., age and prior comorbidities) and therefore less useful for health systems to target for intervention. However, the remaining unexplained variation can be inspected in further studies to discover operational factors that health systems can target to improve quality and value for their patients. Since DRG weights represent the expected resource consumption for a specific hospitalization type relative to the average hospitalization, the data-driven approach we demonstrate can be utilized by any health institution to quantify excess costs and potential savings among DRGs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium\",\"volume\":\"2023 \",\"pages\":\"1201-1208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10785921/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在分析一家学术医疗中心的直接住院费用和临床数据时发现,诊断相关组(DRG)权重等常用指标可解释约 37% 的费用变化,但仅靠病例组合指数(CMI)仍无法解释大量变化。以 CMI 为基准,我们分离出平均成本高于预期的 DRGs,并针对这些 DRGs 开展具体的质量改进工作。虽然 DRGs 总结了出院后的住院护理情况,但对于两个超额成本负担较高的 DRGs,仅使用入院前已知信息的预测模型就能解释高达 60% 的成本变异。这种水平的变异性可能反映了无法改变的潜在患者因素(如年龄和既往合并症),因此对医疗系统的干预目标来说作用不大。然而,在进一步的研究中,可以对剩余的无法解释的变异进行检查,以发现医疗系统可以有针对性地改善患者质量和价值的操作因素。由于 DRG 权重代表了特定住院类型相对于平均住院的预期资源消耗,因此任何医疗机构都可以利用我们展示的数据驱动方法来量化 DRGs 中的超额成本和潜在节约。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Case Mix Index within Diagnosis-Related Groups to Evaluate Variation in Hospitalization Costs at a Large Academic Medical Center.

In analyzing direct hospitalization cost and clinical data from an academic medical center, commonly used metrics such as diagnosis-related group (DRG) weight explain approximately 37% of cost variability, but a substantial amount of variation remains unaccounted for by case mix index (CMI) alone. Using CMI as a benchmark, we isolate and target individual DRGs with higher than expected average costs for specific quality improvement efforts. While DRGs summarize hospitalization care after discharge, a predictive model using only information known before admission explained up to 60% of cost variability for two DRGs with a high excess cost burden. This level of variability likely reflects underlying patient factors that are not modifiable (e.g., age and prior comorbidities) and therefore less useful for health systems to target for intervention. However, the remaining unexplained variation can be inspected in further studies to discover operational factors that health systems can target to improve quality and value for their patients. Since DRG weights represent the expected resource consumption for a specific hospitalization type relative to the average hospitalization, the data-driven approach we demonstrate can be utilized by any health institution to quantify excess costs and potential savings among DRGs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信