Muhammad Waqar Afzal, Ashfaq Ahmad, Syed Amir Gilani, Nimra Zulfaqar, Sahar Fatima, Tahir Mahmmod
{"title":"乌尔都语版腰背痛功能量表在腰背痛患者中的翻译、跨文化适应性和心理计量特性。","authors":"Muhammad Waqar Afzal, Ashfaq Ahmad, Syed Amir Gilani, Nimra Zulfaqar, Sahar Fatima, Tahir Mahmmod","doi":"10.3233/BMR-230153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Translation and validation of important scales in other languages reduce bias in reporting the functional status of the patient.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To translate the Back Pain Functional Scale into Urdu (BPFSu), adapt it for use in other cultures, and evaluate its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>According to Beaton guidelines, translation and cultural adaption was carried out. On 100 Urdu-literate men and women aged 18-60 years with lower back pain, the final BPFSu was assessed for psychometric qualities. First at baseline and again after 7 days, participants completed the BPFSu, the Functional Rating Index (FRI), and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Internal consistency of the BPFSu was excellent (Cronbach's alpha: 0.937). No floor and ceiling effects were found Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.882, CI 95%; 0.830-0.919) was achieved. Spearman correlation coefficient showed criterion validity with the NPRS (rho =â0.701, p⩽ 0.001) and Pearson correlation coefficient showed construct validity with the FRI (r=â0.740, p⩽ 0.001). The minimum detectable changes were 9.96, while the standard error of measurement was 3.6.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BPFSu is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing physical function in individuals experiencing low back discomfort.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Urdu version of the back pain functional scale in low back pain patients.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Waqar Afzal, Ashfaq Ahmad, Syed Amir Gilani, Nimra Zulfaqar, Sahar Fatima, Tahir Mahmmod\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/BMR-230153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Translation and validation of important scales in other languages reduce bias in reporting the functional status of the patient.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To translate the Back Pain Functional Scale into Urdu (BPFSu), adapt it for use in other cultures, and evaluate its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>According to Beaton guidelines, translation and cultural adaption was carried out. On 100 Urdu-literate men and women aged 18-60 years with lower back pain, the final BPFSu was assessed for psychometric qualities. First at baseline and again after 7 days, participants completed the BPFSu, the Functional Rating Index (FRI), and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Internal consistency of the BPFSu was excellent (Cronbach's alpha: 0.937). No floor and ceiling effects were found Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.882, CI 95%; 0.830-0.919) was achieved. Spearman correlation coefficient showed criterion validity with the NPRS (rho =â0.701, p⩽ 0.001) and Pearson correlation coefficient showed construct validity with the FRI (r=â0.740, p⩽ 0.001). The minimum detectable changes were 9.96, while the standard error of measurement was 3.6.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BPFSu is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing physical function in individuals experiencing low back discomfort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-230153\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-230153","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Urdu version of the back pain functional scale in low back pain patients.
Background: Translation and validation of important scales in other languages reduce bias in reporting the functional status of the patient.
Objective: To translate the Back Pain Functional Scale into Urdu (BPFSu), adapt it for use in other cultures, and evaluate its psychometric properties.
Method: According to Beaton guidelines, translation and cultural adaption was carried out. On 100 Urdu-literate men and women aged 18-60 years with lower back pain, the final BPFSu was assessed for psychometric qualities. First at baseline and again after 7 days, participants completed the BPFSu, the Functional Rating Index (FRI), and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).
Results: Internal consistency of the BPFSu was excellent (Cronbach's alpha: 0.937). No floor and ceiling effects were found Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.882, CI 95%; 0.830-0.919) was achieved. Spearman correlation coefficient showed criterion validity with the NPRS (rho =â0.701, p⩽ 0.001) and Pearson correlation coefficient showed construct validity with the FRI (r=â0.740, p⩽ 0.001). The minimum detectable changes were 9.96, while the standard error of measurement was 3.6.
Conclusion: The BPFSu is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing physical function in individuals experiencing low back discomfort.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty.
In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.