衡量高中生的主观幸福感:理想与现实之间

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Zhanna Bruk, Svetlana Ignatjeva, Ludmila Fedina, Ludmila Volosnikova
{"title":"衡量高中生的主观幸福感:理想与现实之间","authors":"Zhanna Bruk, Svetlana Ignatjeva, Ludmila Fedina, Ludmila Volosnikova","doi":"10.1007/s12187-024-10104-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Subjective well-being of high-school students depends on the relationship of the desired and the real. This distance creates conditions for the development of self-regulation and motivation for achievement. The article presents a study of the structure of subjective well-being (SWB) of senior schoolchildren. The study involved 3,282 students in grades 7–11 living in the Tyumen Region of the Russian Federation. The instrumentation used in the study was the author-developed questionnaire based on the questionnaire of The International Survey of Children’s Well-Being – Children's World. The authors suggest that the study of subjective well-being of high school students should more accurately and reliably measure children's desires and evaluations. In addition to the Family, School, Health, and Safety factors, the factor analysis allowed us to identify new factors – Agency and Romance which received high factor loadings. Dispersing the factors of SWB of high school students in the system of desired and real evaluations allowed us to identify internal contradictions. The research design offers the high school students to answer identical questions from two perspectives: how they evaluate the fact that a particular indicator is present in their lives (real level), and how important it is to them (desired level). In the system of evaluations of SWB by high school students, the desired level of factors appeared to be slightly higher than the real one. A two-stage cluster analysis in the space of selected factors made it possible to divide schoolchildren into 3 cluster groups: Romantics, Conformists, and Rebels. The study proves once again that there is no universal formula for well-being. Analysis of the weight coefficients of the desired and real level of SWB in all three groups demonstrated that those more satisfied and prosperous, in whom the structure of all SWB factors is harmoniously correlated are the Romantics, whereas the low level of SWB is noted in Rebels.</p>","PeriodicalId":47682,"journal":{"name":"Child Indicators Research","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Subjective Well-Being of High School Students: Between the Desired and the Real\",\"authors\":\"Zhanna Bruk, Svetlana Ignatjeva, Ludmila Fedina, Ludmila Volosnikova\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12187-024-10104-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Subjective well-being of high-school students depends on the relationship of the desired and the real. This distance creates conditions for the development of self-regulation and motivation for achievement. The article presents a study of the structure of subjective well-being (SWB) of senior schoolchildren. The study involved 3,282 students in grades 7–11 living in the Tyumen Region of the Russian Federation. The instrumentation used in the study was the author-developed questionnaire based on the questionnaire of The International Survey of Children’s Well-Being – Children's World. The authors suggest that the study of subjective well-being of high school students should more accurately and reliably measure children's desires and evaluations. In addition to the Family, School, Health, and Safety factors, the factor analysis allowed us to identify new factors – Agency and Romance which received high factor loadings. Dispersing the factors of SWB of high school students in the system of desired and real evaluations allowed us to identify internal contradictions. The research design offers the high school students to answer identical questions from two perspectives: how they evaluate the fact that a particular indicator is present in their lives (real level), and how important it is to them (desired level). In the system of evaluations of SWB by high school students, the desired level of factors appeared to be slightly higher than the real one. A two-stage cluster analysis in the space of selected factors made it possible to divide schoolchildren into 3 cluster groups: Romantics, Conformists, and Rebels. The study proves once again that there is no universal formula for well-being. Analysis of the weight coefficients of the desired and real level of SWB in all three groups demonstrated that those more satisfied and prosperous, in whom the structure of all SWB factors is harmoniously correlated are the Romantics, whereas the low level of SWB is noted in Rebels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Indicators Research\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Indicators Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-024-10104-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Indicators Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-024-10104-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中学生的主观幸福感取决于理想与现实的关系。这种距离为自我调节和成就动机的发展创造了条件。文章介绍了对高中生主观幸福感(SWB)结构的研究。研究涉及居住在俄罗斯联邦秋明地区的 3282 名 7-11 年级学生。研究使用的工具是作者根据 "儿童福祉国际调查--儿童世界 "问卷编制的问卷。作者建议,对中学生主观幸福感的研究应更准确、更可靠地衡量儿童的愿望和评价。除了家庭、学校、健康和安全因子外,因子分析还让我们发现了新的因子--机构和浪漫,它们获得了较高的因子负荷。将高中生的 SWB 因子分散到期望和实际评价系统中,使我们能够发现内部矛盾。研究设计让高中生从两个角度回答相同的问题:他们如何评价某一指标在他们生活中的存在(真实水平),以及这一指标对他们的重要性(期望水平)。在中学生对社会责任感的评价体系中,期望的因素水平似乎略高于实际的因素水平。通过对所选因素空间的两阶段聚类分析,可以将学生分为三个聚类组:浪漫主义者、顺从者和叛逆者。这项研究再次证明,幸福感没有万能公式。对所有三个组别中期望的和实际的全部社会责任感水平的权重系数进行的分析表明,浪漫主义者的全部社会责任感水平较高,所有社会责任感因素的结构在他们身上都是和谐相关的,而叛逆者的全部社会责任感水平较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Measuring Subjective Well-Being of High School Students: Between the Desired and the Real

Measuring Subjective Well-Being of High School Students: Between the Desired and the Real

Subjective well-being of high-school students depends on the relationship of the desired and the real. This distance creates conditions for the development of self-regulation and motivation for achievement. The article presents a study of the structure of subjective well-being (SWB) of senior schoolchildren. The study involved 3,282 students in grades 7–11 living in the Tyumen Region of the Russian Federation. The instrumentation used in the study was the author-developed questionnaire based on the questionnaire of The International Survey of Children’s Well-Being – Children's World. The authors suggest that the study of subjective well-being of high school students should more accurately and reliably measure children's desires and evaluations. In addition to the Family, School, Health, and Safety factors, the factor analysis allowed us to identify new factors – Agency and Romance which received high factor loadings. Dispersing the factors of SWB of high school students in the system of desired and real evaluations allowed us to identify internal contradictions. The research design offers the high school students to answer identical questions from two perspectives: how they evaluate the fact that a particular indicator is present in their lives (real level), and how important it is to them (desired level). In the system of evaluations of SWB by high school students, the desired level of factors appeared to be slightly higher than the real one. A two-stage cluster analysis in the space of selected factors made it possible to divide schoolchildren into 3 cluster groups: Romantics, Conformists, and Rebels. The study proves once again that there is no universal formula for well-being. Analysis of the weight coefficients of the desired and real level of SWB in all three groups demonstrated that those more satisfied and prosperous, in whom the structure of all SWB factors is harmoniously correlated are the Romantics, whereas the low level of SWB is noted in Rebels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Child Indicators Research
Child Indicators Research SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Child Indicators Research is an international, peer-reviewed quarterly that focuses on measurements and indicators of children''s well-being, and their usage within multiple domains and in diverse cultures. The Journal will present measures and data resources, analysis of the data, exploration of theoretical issues, and information about the status of children, as well as the implementation of this information in policy and practice. It explores how child indicators can be used to improve the development and well-being of children. Child Indicators Research will provide a unique, applied perspective, by presenting a variety of analytical models, different perspectives, and a range of social policy regimes. The Journal will break through the current ‘isolation’ of academicians, researchers and practitioners and serve as a ‘natural habitat’ for anyone interested in child indicators. Unique and exclusive, the Journal will be a source of high quality, policy impact and rigorous scientific papers. Readership: academicians, researchers, government officials, data collectors, providers of funding, practitioners, and journalists who have an interest in children’s well-being issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信