拷问流派:家庭悲剧、橱窗戏剧和伊丽莎白-卡里的《犹太人的美丽女王玛丽亚姆的悲剧》(1613 年)案例

Barbara Sebek
{"title":"拷问流派:家庭悲剧、橱窗戏剧和伊丽莎白-卡里的《犹太人的美丽女王玛丽亚姆的悲剧》(1613 年)案例","authors":"Barbara Sebek","doi":"10.1353/sli.2021.a917125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Interrogating Genre: <span>Domestic Tragedy, Closet Drama, and the Case of Elizabeth Cary’s <em>The Tragedy of Mariam, Fair Queen of Jewry</em> (1613)</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Barbara Sebek (bio) </li> </ul> <p>At the conference that was the genesis of this special issue, I deliberately discussed tragic plays that deviate from the key features of English domestic tragedy that scholars ordinarily use to describe the genre. With a non-English, non-contemporary setting in ancient Judea and a focus on a courtly milieu and dynastic politics rather than the middling ethos that usually inflects domestic tragedy, Elizabeth Cary’s <em>The Tragedy of Mariam, Fair Queen of Jewry</em> (1613) seems at first glance to be a complete outlier to the kind of play that we gathered in Atlanta to discuss, perform, and watch. The impetus to interrogate genre and test the boundaries of domestic tragedy via Cary’s play emerges from a notion of genre as something that is done, both by writers and performers and by critics, readers, and professors. By reflecting on the ways that an outlier-but-adjacent play does and does not align with plays that more fully evince the usual features of a genre, we can enact this notion of genre as a <em>doing</em> rather than a fixed or essential state of being. After all, an intensified interest in experimenting with dramatic genre characterized the early modern period itself, which Jean Howard describes as “one of intense generic theorization and experimentation” (<em>Shakespeare</em> 300). Kim Hall points out that the genre that we’ve come to call “domestic tragedy” emerged at a historical juncture when classic definitions of genre, especially tragedy, “fail to accommodate important groups and concerns” (17). It is with notable self-consciousness that early modern plays that fit the emergent schema for domestic tragedy enter the fray.</p> <p>Consider, for example, how the prologue to one of the period’s salient examples of domestic tragedy, <em>A Warning for Fair Women</em> (1599), attests to contemporary scrutiny of generic choice and subject matter. In this prologue, personified figures of Tragedy, History, and Comedy engage in what Ann Christensen rightly calls “a vicious insult exchange” (3) as Tragedy resorts to violence to stave off the challenges of the other genres to take over the stage.<sup>1</sup> For early modern writers and audiences, the treatment of what Shakespeare’s Christopher Sly in the opening frame story of <strong>[End Page 97]</strong> <em>The Taming of the Shrew</em> calls “household stuff” (Induction 2.135) raises particularly pressing questions about genre. In comedies and tragedies alike, “household stuff” disrupts expectations about the appropriate style, theme, and matter of plays and points to the unsettled and unsettling status of the theatre more generally. In an essay arguing that a “crisis of genre” (132) lies at the core of Cary’s play, Rosemary Kegl uses the framing materials of Shakespeare’s <em>The Taming of the Shrew</em> to set up her discussion (121). As Kegl notes, Shakespeare’s Page tells Christopher Sly that the “pleasant comedy” (Induction 2.125) that he is about to watch is also a “kind of history” (Induction 2.136). Like the challenge presented by History and Comedy in the Prologue to <em>A Warning for Fair Women</em>, the Page’s description of a “pleasant comedy” about “household stuff” as a “kind of history” illustrates the interest in navigating and testing blurred generic boundaries. As Karen Raber helpfully reminds us, “the difference between history as a distinct genre of writing and other forms of poetry or drama was unavailable or at best unstable” in this period (xxv). The same can be said about domestic tragedy. In this essay, I will focus on Cary’s play as a particularly fruitful case study for interrogating these blurry boundaries and for both delineating the parameters of domestic tragedy and recognizing their fluidity. Like other emergent or newly prolific dramatic subgenres in the early modern period, such as city comedy and closet drama, domestic tragedy is in the process of becoming in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth century. A distinctive and outlier play like <em>The Tragedy of Mariam</em> resonates powerfully with that becoming.</p> <p>Despite some substantial deviation from the usual domestic tragedy features delineated by twentieth-century critics, established critics and editors often...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":501368,"journal":{"name":"Studies in the Literary Imagination","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interrogating Genre: Domestic Tragedy, Closet Drama, and the Case of Elizabeth Cary's The Tragedy of Mariam, Fair Queen of Jewry (1613)\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Sebek\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/sli.2021.a917125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Interrogating Genre: <span>Domestic Tragedy, Closet Drama, and the Case of Elizabeth Cary’s <em>The Tragedy of Mariam, Fair Queen of Jewry</em> (1613)</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Barbara Sebek (bio) </li> </ul> <p>At the conference that was the genesis of this special issue, I deliberately discussed tragic plays that deviate from the key features of English domestic tragedy that scholars ordinarily use to describe the genre. With a non-English, non-contemporary setting in ancient Judea and a focus on a courtly milieu and dynastic politics rather than the middling ethos that usually inflects domestic tragedy, Elizabeth Cary’s <em>The Tragedy of Mariam, Fair Queen of Jewry</em> (1613) seems at first glance to be a complete outlier to the kind of play that we gathered in Atlanta to discuss, perform, and watch. The impetus to interrogate genre and test the boundaries of domestic tragedy via Cary’s play emerges from a notion of genre as something that is done, both by writers and performers and by critics, readers, and professors. By reflecting on the ways that an outlier-but-adjacent play does and does not align with plays that more fully evince the usual features of a genre, we can enact this notion of genre as a <em>doing</em> rather than a fixed or essential state of being. After all, an intensified interest in experimenting with dramatic genre characterized the early modern period itself, which Jean Howard describes as “one of intense generic theorization and experimentation” (<em>Shakespeare</em> 300). Kim Hall points out that the genre that we’ve come to call “domestic tragedy” emerged at a historical juncture when classic definitions of genre, especially tragedy, “fail to accommodate important groups and concerns” (17). It is with notable self-consciousness that early modern plays that fit the emergent schema for domestic tragedy enter the fray.</p> <p>Consider, for example, how the prologue to one of the period’s salient examples of domestic tragedy, <em>A Warning for Fair Women</em> (1599), attests to contemporary scrutiny of generic choice and subject matter. In this prologue, personified figures of Tragedy, History, and Comedy engage in what Ann Christensen rightly calls “a vicious insult exchange” (3) as Tragedy resorts to violence to stave off the challenges of the other genres to take over the stage.<sup>1</sup> For early modern writers and audiences, the treatment of what Shakespeare’s Christopher Sly in the opening frame story of <strong>[End Page 97]</strong> <em>The Taming of the Shrew</em> calls “household stuff” (Induction 2.135) raises particularly pressing questions about genre. In comedies and tragedies alike, “household stuff” disrupts expectations about the appropriate style, theme, and matter of plays and points to the unsettled and unsettling status of the theatre more generally. In an essay arguing that a “crisis of genre” (132) lies at the core of Cary’s play, Rosemary Kegl uses the framing materials of Shakespeare’s <em>The Taming of the Shrew</em> to set up her discussion (121). As Kegl notes, Shakespeare’s Page tells Christopher Sly that the “pleasant comedy” (Induction 2.125) that he is about to watch is also a “kind of history” (Induction 2.136). Like the challenge presented by History and Comedy in the Prologue to <em>A Warning for Fair Women</em>, the Page’s description of a “pleasant comedy” about “household stuff” as a “kind of history” illustrates the interest in navigating and testing blurred generic boundaries. As Karen Raber helpfully reminds us, “the difference between history as a distinct genre of writing and other forms of poetry or drama was unavailable or at best unstable” in this period (xxv). The same can be said about domestic tragedy. In this essay, I will focus on Cary’s play as a particularly fruitful case study for interrogating these blurry boundaries and for both delineating the parameters of domestic tragedy and recognizing their fluidity. Like other emergent or newly prolific dramatic subgenres in the early modern period, such as city comedy and closet drama, domestic tragedy is in the process of becoming in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth century. A distinctive and outlier play like <em>The Tragedy of Mariam</em> resonates powerfully with that becoming.</p> <p>Despite some substantial deviation from the usual domestic tragedy features delineated by twentieth-century critics, established critics and editors often...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in the Literary Imagination\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in the Literary Imagination\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/sli.2021.a917125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in the Literary Imagination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sli.2021.a917125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 体裁拷问:家庭悲剧、橱窗戏剧和伊丽莎白-卡里的《美丽女王玛丽亚姆的悲剧》案例家庭悲剧、橱窗戏剧和伊丽莎白-凯里的《犹太女王玛丽亚姆的悲剧》(1613 年)案例 芭芭拉-塞伯克(简历) 在本特刊的创刊会议上,我特意讨论了偏离学者们通常用来描述英国家庭悲剧的主要特征的悲剧剧本。伊丽莎白-凯里(Elizabeth Cary)的《犹太女王玛丽亚姆的悲剧》(The Tragedy of Mariam, Fair Queen of Jewry,1613 年)以非英语、非当代为背景,以宫廷环境和王朝政治为重点,而非通常反映家庭悲剧的中庸之道,乍看之下与我们聚集在亚特兰大讨论、表演和观看的剧目完全不同。通过凯里的剧作来拷问体裁并测试家庭悲剧界限的动力来自于一种体裁概念,即作家和表演者以及评论家、读者和教授都在做的事情。通过反思离群但相近的戏剧与更充分体现流派通常特征的戏剧之间的一致性和不一致性,我们可以将流派这一概念理解为一种行为,而非一种固定或本质的存在状态。毕竟,对戏剧体裁实验的浓厚兴趣是早期现代时期本身的特点,让-霍华德(Jean Howard)将这一时期描述为 "剧种理论化和实验的时期"(《莎士比亚》300)。金-霍尔(Kim Hall)指出,我们称之为 "家庭悲剧 "的体裁是在经典体裁定义(尤其是悲剧)"无法容纳重要群体和关注点"(17)的历史关头出现的。符合家庭悲剧新模式的早期现代戏剧正是带着明显的自觉性进入这一领域的。举例来说,这一时期家庭悲剧的典型代表之一《对窈窕淑女的警告》(1599 年)的序言就证明了当代对一般选择和主题的审查。在这个序幕中,悲剧、历史和喜剧的人格化形象进行了安-克里斯滕森(Ann Christensen)所称的 "恶毒的侮辱性交换"(3),悲剧诉诸暴力以抵御其他流派占领舞台的挑战。无论是在喜剧还是悲剧中,"家务事 "都打破了人们对戏剧的适当风格、主题和内容的期望,并从更广泛的意义上指出了戏剧的不稳定和令人不安的现状。罗斯玛丽-凯格尔(Rosemary Kegl)在一篇论证凯里戏剧的核心是 "体裁危机"(132)的文章中,使用了莎士比亚《驯悍记》的框架材料来展开讨论(121)。Kegl 指出,莎士比亚笔下的佩吉告诉克里斯托弗-斯莱,他即将观看的 "愉快的喜剧"(Induction 2.125)也是 "一种历史"(Induction 2.136)。就像《给漂亮女人的警告》序言中的 "历史 "和 "喜剧 "所提出的挑战一样,佩吉将一部关于 "家务事 "的 "愉快的喜剧 "描述为 "一种历史",也说明了人们对探索和测试模糊的一般界限的兴趣。正如凯伦-拉伯(Karen Raber)提醒我们的那样,"在这一时期,历史作为一种独特的写作体裁与其他形式的诗歌或戏剧之间的区别是不存在的,或者充其量是不稳定的"(xxv)。家庭悲剧也是如此。在这篇文章中,我将重点讨论凯里的戏剧,将其作为一个特别富有成效的案例研究,以探讨这些模糊的界限,并界定家庭悲剧的参数,同时认识到它们的流动性。与现代早期其他新兴或多产的戏剧亚流派(如城市喜剧和壁橱剧)一样,家庭悲剧在 16 世纪末 17 世纪初也正处于形成过程中。像《玛丽雅姆的悲剧》这样与众不同的异类剧目与这一转变产生了强烈的共鸣。尽管《玛丽亚姆的悲剧》在很大程度上偏离了 20 世纪评论家所描绘的通常的家庭悲剧特征,但成熟的评论家和编辑往往......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interrogating Genre: Domestic Tragedy, Closet Drama, and the Case of Elizabeth Cary's The Tragedy of Mariam, Fair Queen of Jewry (1613)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Interrogating Genre: Domestic Tragedy, Closet Drama, and the Case of Elizabeth Cary’s The Tragedy of Mariam, Fair Queen of Jewry (1613)
  • Barbara Sebek (bio)

At the conference that was the genesis of this special issue, I deliberately discussed tragic plays that deviate from the key features of English domestic tragedy that scholars ordinarily use to describe the genre. With a non-English, non-contemporary setting in ancient Judea and a focus on a courtly milieu and dynastic politics rather than the middling ethos that usually inflects domestic tragedy, Elizabeth Cary’s The Tragedy of Mariam, Fair Queen of Jewry (1613) seems at first glance to be a complete outlier to the kind of play that we gathered in Atlanta to discuss, perform, and watch. The impetus to interrogate genre and test the boundaries of domestic tragedy via Cary’s play emerges from a notion of genre as something that is done, both by writers and performers and by critics, readers, and professors. By reflecting on the ways that an outlier-but-adjacent play does and does not align with plays that more fully evince the usual features of a genre, we can enact this notion of genre as a doing rather than a fixed or essential state of being. After all, an intensified interest in experimenting with dramatic genre characterized the early modern period itself, which Jean Howard describes as “one of intense generic theorization and experimentation” (Shakespeare 300). Kim Hall points out that the genre that we’ve come to call “domestic tragedy” emerged at a historical juncture when classic definitions of genre, especially tragedy, “fail to accommodate important groups and concerns” (17). It is with notable self-consciousness that early modern plays that fit the emergent schema for domestic tragedy enter the fray.

Consider, for example, how the prologue to one of the period’s salient examples of domestic tragedy, A Warning for Fair Women (1599), attests to contemporary scrutiny of generic choice and subject matter. In this prologue, personified figures of Tragedy, History, and Comedy engage in what Ann Christensen rightly calls “a vicious insult exchange” (3) as Tragedy resorts to violence to stave off the challenges of the other genres to take over the stage.1 For early modern writers and audiences, the treatment of what Shakespeare’s Christopher Sly in the opening frame story of [End Page 97] The Taming of the Shrew calls “household stuff” (Induction 2.135) raises particularly pressing questions about genre. In comedies and tragedies alike, “household stuff” disrupts expectations about the appropriate style, theme, and matter of plays and points to the unsettled and unsettling status of the theatre more generally. In an essay arguing that a “crisis of genre” (132) lies at the core of Cary’s play, Rosemary Kegl uses the framing materials of Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew to set up her discussion (121). As Kegl notes, Shakespeare’s Page tells Christopher Sly that the “pleasant comedy” (Induction 2.125) that he is about to watch is also a “kind of history” (Induction 2.136). Like the challenge presented by History and Comedy in the Prologue to A Warning for Fair Women, the Page’s description of a “pleasant comedy” about “household stuff” as a “kind of history” illustrates the interest in navigating and testing blurred generic boundaries. As Karen Raber helpfully reminds us, “the difference between history as a distinct genre of writing and other forms of poetry or drama was unavailable or at best unstable” in this period (xxv). The same can be said about domestic tragedy. In this essay, I will focus on Cary’s play as a particularly fruitful case study for interrogating these blurry boundaries and for both delineating the parameters of domestic tragedy and recognizing their fluidity. Like other emergent or newly prolific dramatic subgenres in the early modern period, such as city comedy and closet drama, domestic tragedy is in the process of becoming in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth century. A distinctive and outlier play like The Tragedy of Mariam resonates powerfully with that becoming.

Despite some substantial deviation from the usual domestic tragedy features delineated by twentieth-century critics, established critics and editors often...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信