与气候相关的审慎监管：新观点和政策影响

IF 6.6 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability Pub Date : 2024-01-12 DOI:10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101410

Diego Hidalgo-Oñate , Iluminada Fuertes-Fuertes , J. David Cabedo

{"title":"与气候相关的审慎监管：新观点和政策影响","authors":"Diego Hidalgo-Oñate , Iluminada Fuertes-Fuertes , J. David Cabedo","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article reviews the literature on climate-related prudential regulation, identifying the most relevant articles published in the last two years. The study is situated within the recent developments of this regulation in the United States and the European Union, given the high concentration of Global Systemically Important Banks in these regions. Through this critical analysis, five emerging perspectives have been identified: compensation policy, biodiversity loss, financed emissions, systemic risk, and sustainability taxonomies. The policy implications shed light on the proliferation of voluntary initiatives that may divert from climate goals, and highlight the need for a guided transition through harmonized regulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 101410"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523001574/pdfft?md5=9f42267ce9ed1cb205667e20094276f5&pid=1-s2.0-S1877343523001574-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Climate-related prudential regulation: emerging perspectives and policy implications\",\"authors\":\"Diego Hidalgo-Oñate , Iluminada Fuertes-Fuertes , J. David Cabedo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article reviews the literature on climate-related prudential regulation, identifying the most relevant articles published in the last two years. The study is situated within the recent developments of this regulation in the United States and the European Union, given the high concentration of Global Systemically Important Banks in these regions. Through this critical analysis, five emerging perspectives have been identified: compensation policy, biodiversity loss, financed emissions, systemic risk, and sustainability taxonomies. The policy implications shed light on the proliferation of voluntary initiatives that may divert from climate goals, and highlight the need for a guided transition through harmonized regulation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101410\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523001574/pdfft?md5=9f42267ce9ed1cb205667e20094276f5&pid=1-s2.0-S1877343523001574-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523001574\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523001574","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文回顾了与气候相关的审慎监管文献，确定了过去两年发表的最相关文章。鉴于全球系统重要性银行高度集中在美国和欧盟，本研究结合了这两个地区近期的监管发展情况。通过这一批判性分析，确定了五个新的视角：补偿政策、生物多样性损失、融资排放、系统性风险和可持续性分类法。政策影响揭示了可能偏离气候目标的自愿性倡议的扩散，并强调了通过统一监管引导过渡的必要性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Climate-related prudential regulation: emerging perspectives and policy implications

This article reviews the literature on climate-related prudential regulation, identifying the most relevant articles published in the last two years. The study is situated within the recent developments of this regulation in the United States and the European Union, given the high concentration of Global Systemically Important Banks in these regions. Through this critical analysis, five emerging perspectives have been identified: compensation policy, biodiversity loss, financed emissions, systemic risk, and sustainability taxonomies. The policy implications shed light on the proliferation of voluntary initiatives that may divert from climate goals, and highlight the need for a guided transition through harmonized regulation.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

CiteScore

13.80

自引率

2.80%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： "Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (COSUST)" is a distinguished journal within Elsevier's esteemed scientific publishing portfolio, known for its dedication to high-quality, reproducible research. Launched in 2010, COSUST is a part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite, which is recognized for its editorial excellence and global impact. The journal specializes in peer-reviewed, concise, and timely short reviews that provide a synthesis of recent literature, emerging topics, innovations, and perspectives in the field of environmental sustainability.