表征模型不确定性的便捷方法,应用于哈勃张力的早期暗能量解决方案

IF 4.7 3区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
S Paradiso, M DiMarco, M Chen, G McGee, W J Percival
{"title":"表征模型不确定性的便捷方法,应用于哈勃张力的早期暗能量解决方案","authors":"S Paradiso, M DiMarco, M Chen, G McGee, W J Percival","doi":"10.1093/mnras/stae101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite increasingly precise observations and sophisticated theoretical models, the discrepancy between measurements of H0 from the cosmic microwave background or from Baryon Acoustic Oscillations combined with Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis versus those from local distance ladder probes—commonly known as the ”H0 tension”—continues to perplex the scientific community. To address this tension, Early Dark Energy (EDE) models have been proposed as alternatives to Λ-CDM, as they can change the observed sound horizon and the inferred Hubble constant from measurements based on this. In this paper, we investigate the use of Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) to evaluate EDE as a solution to the H0 tension. BMA consists of assigning a prior to the model and deriving a posterior as for any other unknown parameter in a Bayesian analysis. BMA can be computationally challenging in that one must approximate the joint posterior of both model and parameters. Here we present a computational strategy for BMA that exploits existing MCMC software and combines model-specific posteriors post-hoc. In application to a comprehensive analysis of cosmological datasets, we quantify the impact of EDE on the H0 discrepancy. We find an EDE model probability of $\\sim 90\\%$ whenever we include the H0 measurement from Type Ia Supernovae in the analysis, whereas the other data show a strong preference for the standard cosmological model. We finally present constraints on common parameters marginalized over both cosmological models. For reasonable priors on models with and without EDE, the H0 tension is reduced by at least 20%.","PeriodicalId":18930,"journal":{"name":"Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society","volume":"140 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A convenient approach to characterizing model uncertainty with application to early dark energy solutions of the Hubble tension\",\"authors\":\"S Paradiso, M DiMarco, M Chen, G McGee, W J Percival\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/mnras/stae101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite increasingly precise observations and sophisticated theoretical models, the discrepancy between measurements of H0 from the cosmic microwave background or from Baryon Acoustic Oscillations combined with Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis versus those from local distance ladder probes—commonly known as the ”H0 tension”—continues to perplex the scientific community. To address this tension, Early Dark Energy (EDE) models have been proposed as alternatives to Λ-CDM, as they can change the observed sound horizon and the inferred Hubble constant from measurements based on this. In this paper, we investigate the use of Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) to evaluate EDE as a solution to the H0 tension. BMA consists of assigning a prior to the model and deriving a posterior as for any other unknown parameter in a Bayesian analysis. BMA can be computationally challenging in that one must approximate the joint posterior of both model and parameters. Here we present a computational strategy for BMA that exploits existing MCMC software and combines model-specific posteriors post-hoc. In application to a comprehensive analysis of cosmological datasets, we quantify the impact of EDE on the H0 discrepancy. We find an EDE model probability of $\\\\sim 90\\\\%$ whenever we include the H0 measurement from Type Ia Supernovae in the analysis, whereas the other data show a strong preference for the standard cosmological model. We finally present constraints on common parameters marginalized over both cosmological models. For reasonable priors on models with and without EDE, the H0 tension is reduced by at least 20%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society\",\"volume\":\"140 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae101\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管观测越来越精确,理论模型也越来越复杂,但宇宙微波背景或结合大爆炸核合成的重子声学振荡对 H0 的测量结果与本地距离阶梯探测器对 H0 的测量结果之间的差异--俗称 "H0 张力"--仍然令科学界感到困惑。为了解决这一矛盾,有人提出了早期暗能量(EDE)模型,作为Λ-CDM 的替代方案,因为它们可以改变观测到的声平线和在此基础上测量推断出的哈勃常数。在本文中,我们研究了使用贝叶斯模型平均法(BMA)来评估作为 H0 张力解决方案的 EDE。贝叶斯模型平均法包括为模型指定一个先验值,并推导出一个后验值,就像贝叶斯分析中的任何其他未知参数一样。BMA 在计算上具有挑战性,因为我们必须近似计算模型和参数的联合后验。在这里,我们介绍一种利用现有 MCMC 软件并结合特定模型后验的 BMA 计算策略。通过对宇宙学数据集的综合分析,我们量化了 EDE 对 H0 差异的影响。我们发现,当我们把 Ia 型超新星的 H0 测量数据纳入分析时,EDE 模型的概率为 $\sim 90\%$ ,而其他数据则显示出对标准宇宙学模型的强烈偏好。最后,我们给出了对两种宇宙学模型共同参数边际化的约束。对于有 EDE 和无 EDE 模型的合理先验,H0 张力至少降低了 20%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A convenient approach to characterizing model uncertainty with application to early dark energy solutions of the Hubble tension
Despite increasingly precise observations and sophisticated theoretical models, the discrepancy between measurements of H0 from the cosmic microwave background or from Baryon Acoustic Oscillations combined with Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis versus those from local distance ladder probes—commonly known as the ”H0 tension”—continues to perplex the scientific community. To address this tension, Early Dark Energy (EDE) models have been proposed as alternatives to Λ-CDM, as they can change the observed sound horizon and the inferred Hubble constant from measurements based on this. In this paper, we investigate the use of Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) to evaluate EDE as a solution to the H0 tension. BMA consists of assigning a prior to the model and deriving a posterior as for any other unknown parameter in a Bayesian analysis. BMA can be computationally challenging in that one must approximate the joint posterior of both model and parameters. Here we present a computational strategy for BMA that exploits existing MCMC software and combines model-specific posteriors post-hoc. In application to a comprehensive analysis of cosmological datasets, we quantify the impact of EDE on the H0 discrepancy. We find an EDE model probability of $\sim 90\%$ whenever we include the H0 measurement from Type Ia Supernovae in the analysis, whereas the other data show a strong preference for the standard cosmological model. We finally present constraints on common parameters marginalized over both cosmological models. For reasonable priors on models with and without EDE, the H0 tension is reduced by at least 20%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
37.50%
发文量
3198
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society is one of the world''s leading primary research journals in astronomy and astrophysics, as well as one of the longest established. It publishes the results of original research in positional and dynamical astronomy, astrophysics, radio astronomy, cosmology, space research and the design of astronomical instruments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信