衡量美国科学家、工程师和教育工作者对跨学科与合作的看法

IF 3.5 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Katherine R. McCance, Margaret Blanchard
{"title":"衡量美国科学家、工程师和教育工作者对跨学科与合作的看法","authors":"Katherine R. McCance, Margaret Blanchard","doi":"10.1177/23328584231218952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interdisciplinarity has the potential to lead to more innovation and advances in knowledge than are possible from a single discipline. Yet, little is known about interdisciplinary collaborations and the perceptions of those involved. This quantitative study investigated the perceptions of U.S. faculty, staff, postdocs, and graduate students involved in education and science/engineering collaborations. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted for two modified scales, Collaboration Perceptions (CP; n = 117; 17 items; α = .923) and Interdisciplinarity Perceptions (IP; n = 119; 11 items; α = .852). Participants’ perceptions of collaboration and interdisciplinarity were strongly positive and did not significantly differ based on demographic factors (e.g., gender, discipline, role). Perceptions were influenced by collectivist orientation; the high collectivism group had significantly more positive perceptions of collaboration and interdisciplinarity, and collectivist orientation was positively and significantly correlated with CP and IP scores. Implications and recommendations for interdisciplinary collaborations will be discussed.","PeriodicalId":31132,"journal":{"name":"Aera Open","volume":"23 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring the Interdisciplinarity and Collaboration Perceptions of U.S. Scientists, Engineers, and Educators\",\"authors\":\"Katherine R. McCance, Margaret Blanchard\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23328584231218952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Interdisciplinarity has the potential to lead to more innovation and advances in knowledge than are possible from a single discipline. Yet, little is known about interdisciplinary collaborations and the perceptions of those involved. This quantitative study investigated the perceptions of U.S. faculty, staff, postdocs, and graduate students involved in education and science/engineering collaborations. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted for two modified scales, Collaboration Perceptions (CP; n = 117; 17 items; α = .923) and Interdisciplinarity Perceptions (IP; n = 119; 11 items; α = .852). Participants’ perceptions of collaboration and interdisciplinarity were strongly positive and did not significantly differ based on demographic factors (e.g., gender, discipline, role). Perceptions were influenced by collectivist orientation; the high collectivism group had significantly more positive perceptions of collaboration and interdisciplinarity, and collectivist orientation was positively and significantly correlated with CP and IP scores. Implications and recommendations for interdisciplinary collaborations will be discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aera Open\",\"volume\":\"23 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aera Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231218952\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aera Open","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231218952","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

跨学科有可能带来比单一学科更多的创新和知识进步。然而,人们对跨学科合作以及相关人员的看法却知之甚少。这项定量研究调查了参与教育和科学/工程合作的美国教职员工、博士后和研究生的看法。对两个修订量表进行了探索性因子分析,即 "合作认知"(CP;n = 117;17 个项目;α = .923)和 "跨学科认知"(IP;n = 119;11 个项目;α = .852)。参与者对合作和跨学科性的看法非常积极,并没有因人口统计因素(如性别、学科、角色)的不同而产生显著差异。对合作和跨学科性的看法受到集体主义倾向的影响;高集体主义倾向组对合作和跨学科性的看法明显更积极,集体主义倾向与 CP 和 IP 分数呈显著正相关。将讨论跨学科合作的意义和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring the Interdisciplinarity and Collaboration Perceptions of U.S. Scientists, Engineers, and Educators
Interdisciplinarity has the potential to lead to more innovation and advances in knowledge than are possible from a single discipline. Yet, little is known about interdisciplinary collaborations and the perceptions of those involved. This quantitative study investigated the perceptions of U.S. faculty, staff, postdocs, and graduate students involved in education and science/engineering collaborations. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted for two modified scales, Collaboration Perceptions (CP; n = 117; 17 items; α = .923) and Interdisciplinarity Perceptions (IP; n = 119; 11 items; α = .852). Participants’ perceptions of collaboration and interdisciplinarity were strongly positive and did not significantly differ based on demographic factors (e.g., gender, discipline, role). Perceptions were influenced by collectivist orientation; the high collectivism group had significantly more positive perceptions of collaboration and interdisciplinarity, and collectivist orientation was positively and significantly correlated with CP and IP scores. Implications and recommendations for interdisciplinary collaborations will be discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aera Open
Aera Open EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
60
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信