植骨周股骨骨折治疗共识审查:西班牙植骨周治疗共识(PISCO)研究者的建议

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Pablo Castillón, J. M. Muñoz Vives, H. Aguado, Arantxa Capel Agundez, Alina Ortega-Briones, Jorge Hassan Núñez, _, Agathe Guenego, H. Aguado, Samer Amhaz, Miguel Aroca, Pedro Caba, Arantxa Capel, Pablo Castillón, Santiago Gallardo, Miguel Ángel Giraldez, Vicente Guimera, José Manuel Martínez, J. Muñoz, Carlos Olaya, Alina Ortega, Eudald Romero, Raquel Ruíz, J. Salvador, José Carlos Saló, Jordi Selga, J. Teixidór, Jordi Tomás, Miquel Videla, José Ramón Pérez del Valle
{"title":"植骨周股骨骨折治疗共识审查:西班牙植骨周治疗共识(PISCO)研究者的建议","authors":"Pablo Castillón, J. M. Muñoz Vives, H. Aguado, Arantxa Capel Agundez, Alina Ortega-Briones, Jorge Hassan Núñez, _, Agathe Guenego, H. Aguado, Samer Amhaz, Miguel Aroca, Pedro Caba, Arantxa Capel, Pablo Castillón, Santiago Gallardo, Miguel Ángel Giraldez, Vicente Guimera, José Manuel Martínez, J. Muñoz, Carlos Olaya, Alina Ortega, Eudald Romero, Raquel Ruíz, J. Salvador, José Carlos Saló, Jordi Selga, J. Teixidór, Jordi Tomás, Miquel Videla, José Ramón Pérez del Valle","doi":"10.1530/eor-23-0105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nA peri-implant femoral fracture (PIFF) is defined as a femoral fracture in the presence of a pre-existing non-prosthetic implant. Classification systems, treatment guidelines and fixation strategies exist for peri-prosthetic fractures, but there is no standard of care regarding PIFFs.\n\n\nThe aim of the Peri-Implant Spanish Consensus (aka PISCO) investigators is to reach an agreement regarding current practices for management of PIFFs and to propose four main principles to assess surgical treatment and prevention of these fractures.\n\n\nThis consensus review was conducted according to the Delphi method. Twenty-two expert orthopaedic trauma surgeons performed the consensus and the definitive statements were approved unanimously.\n\n\nBiological fixation principles must be utilized in the surgical treatment of peri-implant femur fractures, which include closed or minimally invasive reduction techniques. The osteosynthesis must protect the entire bone.\n\n\nGaps between two implants should be avoided. If implant overlap is not possible to achieve, then spanning inter-implant fixation systems must be used, especially in osteoporotic bone.\n\n\nPrevious implants should be retained during surgical treatment of peri-implant femur fractures. Only those implants that would interfere with current fixation goals should be removed.\n\n\nIf the previous implant is in the femoral neck region, then femoral neck protection must be maintained when treating the peri-implant fracture, even if the neck fracture has already healed.\n\n","PeriodicalId":48598,"journal":{"name":"Efort Open Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consensus review on peri-implant femur fracture treatment: Peri-Implant Spanish Consensus (PISCO) investigators’ recommendations\",\"authors\":\"Pablo Castillón, J. M. Muñoz Vives, H. Aguado, Arantxa Capel Agundez, Alina Ortega-Briones, Jorge Hassan Núñez, _, Agathe Guenego, H. Aguado, Samer Amhaz, Miguel Aroca, Pedro Caba, Arantxa Capel, Pablo Castillón, Santiago Gallardo, Miguel Ángel Giraldez, Vicente Guimera, José Manuel Martínez, J. Muñoz, Carlos Olaya, Alina Ortega, Eudald Romero, Raquel Ruíz, J. Salvador, José Carlos Saló, Jordi Selga, J. Teixidór, Jordi Tomás, Miquel Videla, José Ramón Pérez del Valle\",\"doi\":\"10.1530/eor-23-0105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\n\\nA peri-implant femoral fracture (PIFF) is defined as a femoral fracture in the presence of a pre-existing non-prosthetic implant. Classification systems, treatment guidelines and fixation strategies exist for peri-prosthetic fractures, but there is no standard of care regarding PIFFs.\\n\\n\\nThe aim of the Peri-Implant Spanish Consensus (aka PISCO) investigators is to reach an agreement regarding current practices for management of PIFFs and to propose four main principles to assess surgical treatment and prevention of these fractures.\\n\\n\\nThis consensus review was conducted according to the Delphi method. Twenty-two expert orthopaedic trauma surgeons performed the consensus and the definitive statements were approved unanimously.\\n\\n\\nBiological fixation principles must be utilized in the surgical treatment of peri-implant femur fractures, which include closed or minimally invasive reduction techniques. The osteosynthesis must protect the entire bone.\\n\\n\\nGaps between two implants should be avoided. If implant overlap is not possible to achieve, then spanning inter-implant fixation systems must be used, especially in osteoporotic bone.\\n\\n\\nPrevious implants should be retained during surgical treatment of peri-implant femur fractures. Only those implants that would interfere with current fixation goals should be removed.\\n\\n\\nIf the previous implant is in the femoral neck region, then femoral neck protection must be maintained when treating the peri-implant fracture, even if the neck fracture has already healed.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":48598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Efort Open Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Efort Open Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1530/eor-23-0105\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Efort Open Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/eor-23-0105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

股骨假体周围骨折(PIFF)的定义是,在已有非假体植入的情况下发生的股骨骨折。假体周围骨折有分类系统、治疗指南和固定策略,但对于 PIFF 还没有统一的治疗标准。"西班牙假体周围骨折共识"(又称 "PISCO")调查人员的目的是就目前处理 PIFF 的方法达成一致,并提出评估手术治疗和预防此类骨折的四项主要原则。22名创伤骨科专家参与了此次共识评审,最终一致通过了最终声明。"股骨假体周围骨折的手术治疗必须采用生物固定原则,包括闭合或微创复位技术。骨合成必须保护整个骨质,应避免两个种植体之间出现间隙。如果无法实现种植体重叠,则必须使用跨种植体间固定系统,尤其是在骨质疏松的骨质中。如果之前植入的假体位于股骨颈区域,那么在治疗假体周围骨折时,即使股骨颈骨折已经愈合,也必须保持对股骨颈的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consensus review on peri-implant femur fracture treatment: Peri-Implant Spanish Consensus (PISCO) investigators’ recommendations
A peri-implant femoral fracture (PIFF) is defined as a femoral fracture in the presence of a pre-existing non-prosthetic implant. Classification systems, treatment guidelines and fixation strategies exist for peri-prosthetic fractures, but there is no standard of care regarding PIFFs. The aim of the Peri-Implant Spanish Consensus (aka PISCO) investigators is to reach an agreement regarding current practices for management of PIFFs and to propose four main principles to assess surgical treatment and prevention of these fractures. This consensus review was conducted according to the Delphi method. Twenty-two expert orthopaedic trauma surgeons performed the consensus and the definitive statements were approved unanimously. Biological fixation principles must be utilized in the surgical treatment of peri-implant femur fractures, which include closed or minimally invasive reduction techniques. The osteosynthesis must protect the entire bone. Gaps between two implants should be avoided. If implant overlap is not possible to achieve, then spanning inter-implant fixation systems must be used, especially in osteoporotic bone. Previous implants should be retained during surgical treatment of peri-implant femur fractures. Only those implants that would interfere with current fixation goals should be removed. If the previous implant is in the femoral neck region, then femoral neck protection must be maintained when treating the peri-implant fracture, even if the neck fracture has already healed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Efort Open Reviews
Efort Open Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EFORT Open Reviews publishes high-quality instructional review articles across the whole field of orthopaedics and traumatology. Commissioned, peer-reviewed articles from international experts summarize current knowledge and practice in orthopaedics, with the aim of providing systematic coverage of the field. All articles undergo rigorous scientific editing to ensure the highest standards of accuracy and clarity. This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will provide integrated CME. It is an authoritative resource for educating trainees and supports practising orthopaedic surgeons in keeping informed about the latest clinical and scientific advances. One print issue containing a selection of papers from the journal will be published each year to coincide with the EFORT Annual Congress. EFORT Open Reviews is the official journal of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) and is published in partnership with The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信