解决相关二元数据中的异方差问题:贝叶斯混合效应位置标度方法

Q4 Medicine
Parisa Rezanejad-Asl, Farid Zayeri, Abbas Hajifathali
{"title":"解决相关二元数据中的异方差问题:贝叶斯混合效应位置标度方法","authors":"Parisa Rezanejad-Asl, Farid Zayeri, Abbas Hajifathali","doi":"10.18502/jbe.v9i2.14628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The mixed effects logistic regression model is a common model for analysing correlated binary data as longitudinal data. The between and within subject variances are typically considered to be homogeneous but longitudinal data often show heterogeneity in these variances. This study proposes a Bayesian mixed effects location scale model to accommodate heteroscedasticity in binary data analysis. \nMethods: This study was carried out in two stages; first, the simulation study was used to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed model with the Bayesian approach and then the proposed model was applied to a real data. In simulation study, the data were generated from the mixed effects location scale model with different correlations between the random location effect and random scale effect and different sample sizes. In order to evaluate the accuracy of the estimations, the Root Mean Square Error, bias and Coverage Probability were calculated and the deviance information criterion was used to select the appropriate model. At the end we utilized this model to analyse uric acid levels of patients with haematological disorders. \nResults: The simulation results show the accuracy of model parameter estimates as well as the correlation between random location and scale effects. They also display that if a random scale effect is present in the data, it should be accounted for in model. Otherwise, the model is forced to assign the within subject variation due to these subject random effects to the error term. The results of real data are also in line with this. The odds of having normal UA levels increases by a factor of 26% per week. Due to the positive value of the covariance parameter, patients with higher mean of UA levels show higher variation in UA levels. Furthermore, the significance of the covariates in the between subject and within subject variances model, as well as the significance of the random scale variance determines the heterogeneity across subjects. \nConclusion: Bayesian mixed effects location scale model provides a useful tool for analysing correlated binary data with heteroscedasticity because it considers data correlation and modelling mean and variance simultaneously. Furthermore, it improves the accuracy of statistical inference in longitudinal studies compared to classic mixed effects models.","PeriodicalId":34310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing Heteroscedasticity in Correlated Binary Data: A Bayesian Mixed Effects Location Scale Approach\",\"authors\":\"Parisa Rezanejad-Asl, Farid Zayeri, Abbas Hajifathali\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jbe.v9i2.14628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The mixed effects logistic regression model is a common model for analysing correlated binary data as longitudinal data. The between and within subject variances are typically considered to be homogeneous but longitudinal data often show heterogeneity in these variances. This study proposes a Bayesian mixed effects location scale model to accommodate heteroscedasticity in binary data analysis. \\nMethods: This study was carried out in two stages; first, the simulation study was used to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed model with the Bayesian approach and then the proposed model was applied to a real data. In simulation study, the data were generated from the mixed effects location scale model with different correlations between the random location effect and random scale effect and different sample sizes. In order to evaluate the accuracy of the estimations, the Root Mean Square Error, bias and Coverage Probability were calculated and the deviance information criterion was used to select the appropriate model. At the end we utilized this model to analyse uric acid levels of patients with haematological disorders. \\nResults: The simulation results show the accuracy of model parameter estimates as well as the correlation between random location and scale effects. They also display that if a random scale effect is present in the data, it should be accounted for in model. Otherwise, the model is forced to assign the within subject variation due to these subject random effects to the error term. The results of real data are also in line with this. The odds of having normal UA levels increases by a factor of 26% per week. Due to the positive value of the covariance parameter, patients with higher mean of UA levels show higher variation in UA levels. Furthermore, the significance of the covariates in the between subject and within subject variances model, as well as the significance of the random scale variance determines the heterogeneity across subjects. \\nConclusion: Bayesian mixed effects location scale model provides a useful tool for analysing correlated binary data with heteroscedasticity because it considers data correlation and modelling mean and variance simultaneously. Furthermore, it improves the accuracy of statistical inference in longitudinal studies compared to classic mixed effects models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jbe.v9i2.14628\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jbe.v9i2.14628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介混合效应逻辑回归模型是分析作为纵向数据的相关二元数据的常用模型。主体间方差和主体内方差通常被认为是同质的,但纵向数据往往显示出这些方差的异质性。本研究提出了一种贝叶斯混合效应位置标度模型,以适应二元数据分析中的异方差性。研究方法本研究分两个阶段进行:首先,使用贝叶斯方法进行模拟研究,以评估所提模型的准确性;然后,将所提模型应用于真实数据。在模拟研究中,数据来自混合效应位置规模模型,随机位置效应和随机规模效应之间存在不同的相关性,样本量也不同。为了评估估计的准确性,我们计算了均方根误差、偏差和覆盖概率,并使用偏差信息标准来选择合适的模型。最后,我们利用该模型分析了血液病患者的尿酸水平。结果模拟结果显示了模型参数估计的准确性以及随机位置效应和规模效应之间的相关性。模拟结果还显示,如果数据中存在随机比例效应,则应在模型中加以考虑。否则,模型将被迫把这些主体随机效应导致的主体内变化归入误差项。真实数据的结果也与此相符。UA 水平正常的几率每周增加 26%。由于协方差参数为正值,尿酸水平平均值较高的患者尿酸水平变化较大。此外,协变量在受试者之间和受试者内部方差模型中的显著性以及随机比例方差的显著性决定了受试者之间的异质性。结论贝叶斯混合效应位置标度模型为分析具有异方差性的相关二元数据提供了有用的工具,因为它同时考虑了数据相关性以及均值和方差建模。此外,与传统的混合效应模型相比,它还能提高纵向研究中统计推断的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Addressing Heteroscedasticity in Correlated Binary Data: A Bayesian Mixed Effects Location Scale Approach
Introduction: The mixed effects logistic regression model is a common model for analysing correlated binary data as longitudinal data. The between and within subject variances are typically considered to be homogeneous but longitudinal data often show heterogeneity in these variances. This study proposes a Bayesian mixed effects location scale model to accommodate heteroscedasticity in binary data analysis. Methods: This study was carried out in two stages; first, the simulation study was used to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed model with the Bayesian approach and then the proposed model was applied to a real data. In simulation study, the data were generated from the mixed effects location scale model with different correlations between the random location effect and random scale effect and different sample sizes. In order to evaluate the accuracy of the estimations, the Root Mean Square Error, bias and Coverage Probability were calculated and the deviance information criterion was used to select the appropriate model. At the end we utilized this model to analyse uric acid levels of patients with haematological disorders. Results: The simulation results show the accuracy of model parameter estimates as well as the correlation between random location and scale effects. They also display that if a random scale effect is present in the data, it should be accounted for in model. Otherwise, the model is forced to assign the within subject variation due to these subject random effects to the error term. The results of real data are also in line with this. The odds of having normal UA levels increases by a factor of 26% per week. Due to the positive value of the covariance parameter, patients with higher mean of UA levels show higher variation in UA levels. Furthermore, the significance of the covariates in the between subject and within subject variances model, as well as the significance of the random scale variance determines the heterogeneity across subjects. Conclusion: Bayesian mixed effects location scale model provides a useful tool for analysing correlated binary data with heteroscedasticity because it considers data correlation and modelling mean and variance simultaneously. Furthermore, it improves the accuracy of statistical inference in longitudinal studies compared to classic mixed effects models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信