通过皮质骨力学技术测量尺骨挠曲刚度的骨折辨别能力:"更强大 "研究的研究方案

IF 3.4 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
JBMR Plus Pub Date : 2024-01-04 DOI:10.1093/jbmrpl/ziad002
Stuart J Warden, Andrew Dick, Janet E Simon, Todd M. Manini, David W. Russ, Charalampos Lyssikatos, Leatha A. Clark, Brian C. Clark
{"title":"通过皮质骨力学技术测量尺骨挠曲刚度的骨折辨别能力:\"更强大 \"研究的研究方案","authors":"Stuart J Warden, Andrew Dick, Janet E Simon, Todd M. Manini, David W. Russ, Charalampos Lyssikatos, Leatha A. Clark, Brian C. Clark","doi":"10.1093/jbmrpl/ziad002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Osteoporosis is characterized by low bone mass and structural deterioration of bone tissue, leading to bone fragility (i.e., weakness) and an increased risk for fracture. The current standard for assessing bone health and diagnosing osteoporosis is dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), which quantifies areal bone mineral density (BMD), typically at the hip and spine. However, DXA-derived BMD assesses only one component of bone health and is notably limited in evaluating bone strength, a critical factor in fracture resistance. Although multifrequency vibration analysis can quickly and painlessly assay bone strength, there has been limited success in advancing a device of this nature. Recent progress has resulted in the development of Cortical Bone Mechanics Technology (CBMT), which conducts a dynamic 3-point bending test to assess the flexural rigidity (EI) of ulnar cortical bone. Data indicates that ulnar EI accurately estimates ulnar whole bone strength and provides unique and independent information about cortical bone compared to DXA-derived BMD. Consequently, CBMT has the potential to address a critical unmet need: better identification of patients with diminished bone strength who are at high risk of experiencing a fragility fracture. However, the clinical utility of CBMT-derived EI has not yet been demonstrated. We have designed a clinical study to assess the accuracy of CBMT-derived ulnar EI in discriminating post-menopausal women who have suffered a fragility fracture from those who have not. These data will be compared to DXA-derived peripheral and central measures of BMD obtained from the same subjects. In this article, we describe the study protocol for this multi-center fracture discrimination study (The STRONGER Study).","PeriodicalId":14611,"journal":{"name":"JBMR Plus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fracture discrimination capability of ulnar flexural rigidity measured via cortical bone mechanics technology: study protocol for the Stronger study\",\"authors\":\"Stuart J Warden, Andrew Dick, Janet E Simon, Todd M. Manini, David W. Russ, Charalampos Lyssikatos, Leatha A. Clark, Brian C. Clark\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbmrpl/ziad002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Osteoporosis is characterized by low bone mass and structural deterioration of bone tissue, leading to bone fragility (i.e., weakness) and an increased risk for fracture. The current standard for assessing bone health and diagnosing osteoporosis is dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), which quantifies areal bone mineral density (BMD), typically at the hip and spine. However, DXA-derived BMD assesses only one component of bone health and is notably limited in evaluating bone strength, a critical factor in fracture resistance. Although multifrequency vibration analysis can quickly and painlessly assay bone strength, there has been limited success in advancing a device of this nature. Recent progress has resulted in the development of Cortical Bone Mechanics Technology (CBMT), which conducts a dynamic 3-point bending test to assess the flexural rigidity (EI) of ulnar cortical bone. Data indicates that ulnar EI accurately estimates ulnar whole bone strength and provides unique and independent information about cortical bone compared to DXA-derived BMD. Consequently, CBMT has the potential to address a critical unmet need: better identification of patients with diminished bone strength who are at high risk of experiencing a fragility fracture. However, the clinical utility of CBMT-derived EI has not yet been demonstrated. We have designed a clinical study to assess the accuracy of CBMT-derived ulnar EI in discriminating post-menopausal women who have suffered a fragility fracture from those who have not. These data will be compared to DXA-derived peripheral and central measures of BMD obtained from the same subjects. In this article, we describe the study protocol for this multi-center fracture discrimination study (The STRONGER Study).\",\"PeriodicalId\":14611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBMR Plus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBMR Plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmrpl/ziad002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBMR Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmrpl/ziad002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

骨质疏松症的特点是骨量低和骨组织结构退化,导致骨质脆弱(即软弱无力)和骨折风险增加。目前评估骨骼健康和诊断骨质疏松症的标准是双能 X 射线吸收测量法(DXA),它可以量化骨矿密度(BMD),通常是髋关节和脊柱的骨矿密度。然而,DXA 导出的 BMD 仅能评估骨骼健康的一个组成部分,在评估骨强度(抗骨折的一个关键因素)方面具有明显的局限性。虽然多频振动分析可以快速、无痛地检测骨强度,但在推广此类设备方面取得的成功却很有限。最近的进展是开发出了皮质骨力学技术(CBMT),该技术可进行动态三点弯曲测试,以评估尺骨皮质骨的弯曲刚度(EI)。数据表明,尺骨 EI 能准确估算尺骨整体强度,与 DXA 导出的 BMD 相比,它能提供独特而独立的皮质骨信息。因此,CBMT 有可能满足一项关键的未满足需求:更好地识别骨强度减弱且有发生脆性骨折高风险的患者。然而,CBMT 衍生 EI 的临床实用性尚未得到证实。我们设计了一项临床研究,以评估 CBMT 导出的尺骨 EI 在区分绝经后脆性骨折妇女和未发生脆性骨折妇女方面的准确性。这些数据将与从同一受试者身上获得的 DXA 导出的外周和中心 BMD 测量值进行比较。在本文中,我们将介绍这项多中心骨折鉴别研究(STRONGER 研究)的研究方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fracture discrimination capability of ulnar flexural rigidity measured via cortical bone mechanics technology: study protocol for the Stronger study
Osteoporosis is characterized by low bone mass and structural deterioration of bone tissue, leading to bone fragility (i.e., weakness) and an increased risk for fracture. The current standard for assessing bone health and diagnosing osteoporosis is dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), which quantifies areal bone mineral density (BMD), typically at the hip and spine. However, DXA-derived BMD assesses only one component of bone health and is notably limited in evaluating bone strength, a critical factor in fracture resistance. Although multifrequency vibration analysis can quickly and painlessly assay bone strength, there has been limited success in advancing a device of this nature. Recent progress has resulted in the development of Cortical Bone Mechanics Technology (CBMT), which conducts a dynamic 3-point bending test to assess the flexural rigidity (EI) of ulnar cortical bone. Data indicates that ulnar EI accurately estimates ulnar whole bone strength and provides unique and independent information about cortical bone compared to DXA-derived BMD. Consequently, CBMT has the potential to address a critical unmet need: better identification of patients with diminished bone strength who are at high risk of experiencing a fragility fracture. However, the clinical utility of CBMT-derived EI has not yet been demonstrated. We have designed a clinical study to assess the accuracy of CBMT-derived ulnar EI in discriminating post-menopausal women who have suffered a fragility fracture from those who have not. These data will be compared to DXA-derived peripheral and central measures of BMD obtained from the same subjects. In this article, we describe the study protocol for this multi-center fracture discrimination study (The STRONGER Study).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JBMR Plus
JBMR Plus Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
103
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信