Ken Farnes, Neville Hurst, Woon-Weng Wong, S. Wilkinson
{"title":"关于以公交为导向的发展(TOD)对铁路基础设施项目的益处的探索性研究","authors":"Ken Farnes, Neville Hurst, Woon-Weng Wong, S. Wilkinson","doi":"10.1108/sasbe-03-2023-0058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this study was to explore and critique the benefits and disbenefits that transport orientated development (TOD) brings to neighbourhoods in proximity to public transport hubs.Design/methodology/approachThis is an exploratory study that may also be described as a rapid review that aims to provide coverage of the available literature in a systematic process that is simplified to produce information in a timely manner. Due to the relatively small number of available studies from peer-reviewed sources, the variety of methods and data used and the constrained time available for this study, the study did not immediately lend itself to a more thorough systematic literature review.FindingsThe literature shows the discourse on TOD upholds its promise to create a high-density mixed-use walkable neighbourhood supported by transport infrastructure, increasing accessibility, minimising vehicle dependency, reducing traffic congestion, moderating urban sprawl and reducing pollution. There are few articles on the negative aspects of TOD, particularly concerning social exclusion, crime, sustainability and concerns about gentrification of neighbourhoods.Research limitations/implicationsThe study did not immediately lend itself to a more thorough systematic literature review due to the relatively small number of available studies, the variety of methods and data used and the constrained time available for this study.Originality/valueThis study allows social investigators, policymakers and developers understand the benefits and disbenefits of TOD including policy implications regarding potential criminogenic factors.","PeriodicalId":45779,"journal":{"name":"Smart and Sustainable Built Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An exploratory study on the benefits of transit orientated development (TOD) to rail infrastructure projects\",\"authors\":\"Ken Farnes, Neville Hurst, Woon-Weng Wong, S. Wilkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/sasbe-03-2023-0058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe purpose of this study was to explore and critique the benefits and disbenefits that transport orientated development (TOD) brings to neighbourhoods in proximity to public transport hubs.Design/methodology/approachThis is an exploratory study that may also be described as a rapid review that aims to provide coverage of the available literature in a systematic process that is simplified to produce information in a timely manner. Due to the relatively small number of available studies from peer-reviewed sources, the variety of methods and data used and the constrained time available for this study, the study did not immediately lend itself to a more thorough systematic literature review.FindingsThe literature shows the discourse on TOD upholds its promise to create a high-density mixed-use walkable neighbourhood supported by transport infrastructure, increasing accessibility, minimising vehicle dependency, reducing traffic congestion, moderating urban sprawl and reducing pollution. There are few articles on the negative aspects of TOD, particularly concerning social exclusion, crime, sustainability and concerns about gentrification of neighbourhoods.Research limitations/implicationsThe study did not immediately lend itself to a more thorough systematic literature review due to the relatively small number of available studies, the variety of methods and data used and the constrained time available for this study.Originality/valueThis study allows social investigators, policymakers and developers understand the benefits and disbenefits of TOD including policy implications regarding potential criminogenic factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Smart and Sustainable Built Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Smart and Sustainable Built Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-03-2023-0058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart and Sustainable Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-03-2023-0058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是探讨和评论以交通为导向的开发(TOD)给公共交通枢纽附近社区带来的益处和弊端。设计/方法/方法这是一项探索性研究,也可以说是一项快速综述,旨在通过简化的系统过程提供现有文献的覆盖范围,以便及时提供信息。由于同行评审来源的可用研究数量相对较少,所使用的方法和数据多种多样,以及本研究的时间有限,因此本研究无法立即进行更彻底的系统性文献综述。研究结果文献显示,关于 TOD 的讨论坚持了其承诺,即在交通基础设施的支持下,创建一个高密度、多功能、可步行的街区,增加可达性,最大限度地减少对车辆的依赖,减少交通拥堵,减缓城市扩张并减少污染。关于 TOD 负面影响的文章很少,尤其是在社会排斥、犯罪、可持续性以及对社区绅士化的担忧方面。研究局限性/影响由于现有研究数量相对较少,使用的方法和数据多种多样,而且研究时间有限,因此本研究无法立即进行更彻底的系统性文献综述。
An exploratory study on the benefits of transit orientated development (TOD) to rail infrastructure projects
PurposeThe purpose of this study was to explore and critique the benefits and disbenefits that transport orientated development (TOD) brings to neighbourhoods in proximity to public transport hubs.Design/methodology/approachThis is an exploratory study that may also be described as a rapid review that aims to provide coverage of the available literature in a systematic process that is simplified to produce information in a timely manner. Due to the relatively small number of available studies from peer-reviewed sources, the variety of methods and data used and the constrained time available for this study, the study did not immediately lend itself to a more thorough systematic literature review.FindingsThe literature shows the discourse on TOD upholds its promise to create a high-density mixed-use walkable neighbourhood supported by transport infrastructure, increasing accessibility, minimising vehicle dependency, reducing traffic congestion, moderating urban sprawl and reducing pollution. There are few articles on the negative aspects of TOD, particularly concerning social exclusion, crime, sustainability and concerns about gentrification of neighbourhoods.Research limitations/implicationsThe study did not immediately lend itself to a more thorough systematic literature review due to the relatively small number of available studies, the variety of methods and data used and the constrained time available for this study.Originality/valueThis study allows social investigators, policymakers and developers understand the benefits and disbenefits of TOD including policy implications regarding potential criminogenic factors.