红光 LED 光疗法治疗雄激素性脱发和非雄激素性脱发患者长 COVID 过程中的毛囊性脱发

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
A. Gerkowicz, J. Bartosińska, P. Krakowski, R. Karpiński, D. Krasowska, Dorota Raczkiewicz, Mirosław Kwaśny, Dorota Krasowska
{"title":"红光 LED 光疗法治疗雄激素性脱发和非雄激素性脱发患者长 COVID 过程中的毛囊性脱发","authors":"A. Gerkowicz, J. Bartosińska, P. Krakowski, R. Karpiński, D. Krasowska, Dorota Raczkiewicz, Mirosław Kwaśny, Dorota Krasowska","doi":"10.26444/aaem/177238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and Objective . Photobiomodulation with the use of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) seems to be a promising option for long COVID. This retrospective study evaluates the efficiency of LED irradiation in the treatment of TE in the course of long COVID in patients with and without androgenetic alopecia. Materials and methods. A retrospective single-centre chart review of patients with post-COVID hair loss was performed. 140 patients enrolled to the study were divided into four groups depending on the type of alopecia and treatment: 1) telogen effluvium with LED therapy (TE LED+), 2) telogen effluvium without LED therapy (TE LED-), 3) telogen effluvium and androgenetic alopecia with LED therapy (TE+AGA LED+), and 4) telogen effluvium and androgenetic alopecia without LED therapy (TE+AGA LED-). Clinical and trichoscopic parameters were compared. Results . After 12 weeks, cessation of hair loss and a negative hair pull test were more common in TE LED+ and TE+AGA LED+ in comparison to the patients without LED therapy (p<0.001, p=0.035, respectively). An increased number of thick hairs and an increased number of hairs within follicular units were more common in patients treated with LED irradiation, regardless of the type of alopecia, compared to the patients without LED therapy. Conclusions . The study revealed that LED therapy is safe, well tolerated and seems to be a promising therapeutic option for TE in patients with long COVID. It can be used as adjuvant therapy leading to faster reduction of hair loss, enhancing hair regrowth as well as hair shaft thickness and density.","PeriodicalId":50970,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine","volume":"56 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Red LED light therapy for telogen effluvium in the course of long COVID in patients with and without androgenetic alopecia\",\"authors\":\"A. Gerkowicz, J. Bartosińska, P. Krakowski, R. Karpiński, D. Krasowska, Dorota Raczkiewicz, Mirosław Kwaśny, Dorota Krasowska\",\"doi\":\"10.26444/aaem/177238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction and Objective . Photobiomodulation with the use of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) seems to be a promising option for long COVID. This retrospective study evaluates the efficiency of LED irradiation in the treatment of TE in the course of long COVID in patients with and without androgenetic alopecia. Materials and methods. A retrospective single-centre chart review of patients with post-COVID hair loss was performed. 140 patients enrolled to the study were divided into four groups depending on the type of alopecia and treatment: 1) telogen effluvium with LED therapy (TE LED+), 2) telogen effluvium without LED therapy (TE LED-), 3) telogen effluvium and androgenetic alopecia with LED therapy (TE+AGA LED+), and 4) telogen effluvium and androgenetic alopecia without LED therapy (TE+AGA LED-). Clinical and trichoscopic parameters were compared. Results . After 12 weeks, cessation of hair loss and a negative hair pull test were more common in TE LED+ and TE+AGA LED+ in comparison to the patients without LED therapy (p<0.001, p=0.035, respectively). An increased number of thick hairs and an increased number of hairs within follicular units were more common in patients treated with LED irradiation, regardless of the type of alopecia, compared to the patients without LED therapy. Conclusions . The study revealed that LED therapy is safe, well tolerated and seems to be a promising therapeutic option for TE in patients with long COVID. It can be used as adjuvant therapy leading to faster reduction of hair loss, enhancing hair regrowth as well as hair shaft thickness and density.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine\",\"volume\":\"56 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/177238\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/177238","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言和目的 .使用发光二极管(LED)进行光生物调制似乎是治疗长COVID的一种很有前景的方法。这项回顾性研究评估了 LED 照射治疗 TE 在雄激素性脱发患者和非雄激素性脱发患者长 COVID 病程中的疗效。材料与方法。该研究对 COVID 后脱发患者进行了回顾性单中心病历审查。根据脱发类型和治疗方法将 140 名患者分为四组:1) 毛囊性脱发,采用LED疗法(TE LED+);2) 毛囊性脱发,不采用LED疗法(TE LED-);3) 毛囊性脱发和雄激素性脱发,采用LED疗法(TE+AGA LED+);4) 毛囊性脱发和雄激素性脱发,不采用LED疗法(TE+AGA LED-)。比较了临床和毛囊镜参数。结果 .12 周后,与未接受 LED 治疗的患者相比,TE LED+ 和 TE+AGA LED+ 的脱发停止率和头发拉力测试阴性率更高(分别为 p<0.001 和 p=0.035)。与未接受 LED 治疗的患者相比,无论脱发类型如何,接受 LED 照射治疗的患者中,毛囊单位内粗毛发数量增加和毛囊单位内毛发数量增加的情况更常见。结论 .研究表明,LED疗法安全、耐受性好,似乎是治疗长COVID患者TE的一种很有前途的疗法。它可作为辅助疗法使用,能更快地减少脱发,促进头发再生,增加发干厚度和密度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Red LED light therapy for telogen effluvium in the course of long COVID in patients with and without androgenetic alopecia
Introduction and Objective . Photobiomodulation with the use of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) seems to be a promising option for long COVID. This retrospective study evaluates the efficiency of LED irradiation in the treatment of TE in the course of long COVID in patients with and without androgenetic alopecia. Materials and methods. A retrospective single-centre chart review of patients with post-COVID hair loss was performed. 140 patients enrolled to the study were divided into four groups depending on the type of alopecia and treatment: 1) telogen effluvium with LED therapy (TE LED+), 2) telogen effluvium without LED therapy (TE LED-), 3) telogen effluvium and androgenetic alopecia with LED therapy (TE+AGA LED+), and 4) telogen effluvium and androgenetic alopecia without LED therapy (TE+AGA LED-). Clinical and trichoscopic parameters were compared. Results . After 12 weeks, cessation of hair loss and a negative hair pull test were more common in TE LED+ and TE+AGA LED+ in comparison to the patients without LED therapy (p<0.001, p=0.035, respectively). An increased number of thick hairs and an increased number of hairs within follicular units were more common in patients treated with LED irradiation, regardless of the type of alopecia, compared to the patients without LED therapy. Conclusions . The study revealed that LED therapy is safe, well tolerated and seems to be a promising therapeutic option for TE in patients with long COVID. It can be used as adjuvant therapy leading to faster reduction of hair loss, enhancing hair regrowth as well as hair shaft thickness and density.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine
Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: All papers within the scope indicated by the following sections of the journal may be submitted: Biological agents posing occupational risk in agriculture, forestry, food industry and wood industry and diseases caused by these agents (zoonoses, allergic and immunotoxic diseases). Health effects of chemical pollutants in agricultural areas , including occupational and non-occupational effects of agricultural chemicals (pesticides, fertilizers) and effects of industrial disposal (heavy metals, sulphur, etc.) contaminating the atmosphere, soil and water. Exposure to physical hazards associated with the use of machinery in agriculture and forestry: noise, vibration, dust. Prevention of occupational diseases in agriculture, forestry, food industry and wood industry. Work-related accidents and injuries in agriculture, forestry, food industry and wood industry: incidence, causes, social aspects and prevention. State of the health of rural communities depending on various factors: social factors, accessibility of medical care, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信