中国天然林和人工林森林生物量和土壤有机碳累积的驱动因素

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Tao Wang, Lingbo Dong, Zhaogang Liu
{"title":"中国天然林和人工林森林生物量和土壤有机碳累积的驱动因素","authors":"Tao Wang, Lingbo Dong, Zhaogang Liu","doi":"10.3389/ffgc.2023.1333868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forests play a pivotal role within the global carbon cycle. However, how to enhance carbon storage in existing forests remains unclear.In this study, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of data from 2,948 forest sites across China. Utilizing structural equation modeling (SEM), we investigate the intricate relationship between climate, tree species diversity, stand structure, function traits, initial biomass carbon stocks (BCi), soil organic carbon stocks (Soil C content), and carbon accumulation in biomass (ΔBC) and soil organic carbon stocks (ΔSOC) within both natural forests (NF, n = 1,910) and planted forests (PF, n = 1,038).Our findings underscore the critical influence of tree species diversity and stand structure drivers of both direct and indirect carbon accumulation, with distinct drivers emerging based on the carbon pools in NF and PF. Specifically, increasing tree species diversity from its minimum to maximum value through management-results in a 14.798 tC/ha reduction in BC and 0.686 tC/ha in SOC in NF. Conversely, amplifies BC and SOC in PF by 0.338 tC/ha and 0.065 tC/ha, respectively. Enhancing stand structure-such as stand density-results in a 231.727 tC/ha reduction in BC and SOC in NF, and a 10.668 tC/ha in BC and 64.008 tC/ha increment in SOC in PF.Overall, our results indicate that higher tree species diversity, stand density and age-group limits further carbon accumulation in BC and SOC in current NF. In contrast, low tree species diversity and stand density limits the development of carbon storage potential in planted forests. To enhance carbon sequestration capacity, China should change its current policy of completely banning logging of natural forests. Natural forests need thinning and reduced tree species diversity, while planted forests should increase tree species diversity and stand density.","PeriodicalId":12538,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","volume":"34 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors driving carbon accumulation in forest biomass and soil organic carbon across natural forests and planted forests in China\",\"authors\":\"Tao Wang, Lingbo Dong, Zhaogang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/ffgc.2023.1333868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Forests play a pivotal role within the global carbon cycle. However, how to enhance carbon storage in existing forests remains unclear.In this study, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of data from 2,948 forest sites across China. Utilizing structural equation modeling (SEM), we investigate the intricate relationship between climate, tree species diversity, stand structure, function traits, initial biomass carbon stocks (BCi), soil organic carbon stocks (Soil C content), and carbon accumulation in biomass (ΔBC) and soil organic carbon stocks (ΔSOC) within both natural forests (NF, n = 1,910) and planted forests (PF, n = 1,038).Our findings underscore the critical influence of tree species diversity and stand structure drivers of both direct and indirect carbon accumulation, with distinct drivers emerging based on the carbon pools in NF and PF. Specifically, increasing tree species diversity from its minimum to maximum value through management-results in a 14.798 tC/ha reduction in BC and 0.686 tC/ha in SOC in NF. Conversely, amplifies BC and SOC in PF by 0.338 tC/ha and 0.065 tC/ha, respectively. Enhancing stand structure-such as stand density-results in a 231.727 tC/ha reduction in BC and SOC in NF, and a 10.668 tC/ha in BC and 64.008 tC/ha increment in SOC in PF.Overall, our results indicate that higher tree species diversity, stand density and age-group limits further carbon accumulation in BC and SOC in current NF. In contrast, low tree species diversity and stand density limits the development of carbon storage potential in planted forests. To enhance carbon sequestration capacity, China should change its current policy of completely banning logging of natural forests. Natural forests need thinning and reduced tree species diversity, while planted forests should increase tree species diversity and stand density.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change\",\"volume\":\"34 20\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1333868\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1333868","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

森林在全球碳循环中发挥着举足轻重的作用。在本研究中,我们对来自中国 2,948 个林地的数据进行了综合分析。利用结构方程模型(SEM),我们研究了天然林(NF,n = 1,910 个)和人工林(PF,n = 1,038 个)中气候、树种多样性、林分结构、功能性状、初始生物量碳储量(BCi)、土壤有机碳储量(Soil C content)、生物量碳储量(ΔBC)和土壤有机碳储量(ΔSOC)之间错综复杂的关系。我们的研究结果强调了树种多样性和林分结构对直接和间接碳积累的重要影响,并根据天然林和人工林的碳库得出了不同的驱动因素。具体而言,通过管理将树种多样性从最低值提高到最高值--会导致 NF 的 BC 和 SOC 分别减少 14.798 吨碳/公顷和 0.686 吨碳/公顷。相反,PF 的 BC 和 SOC 分别增加了 0.338 吨碳/公顷和 0.065 吨碳/公顷。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,较高的树种多样性、林分密度和树龄组限制了当前NF中BC和SOC的进一步碳积累。与此相反,低树种多样性和林分密度限制了人工林碳储存潜力的发展。为提高固碳能力,中国应改变目前完全禁止采伐天然林的政策。天然林需要疏伐并减少树种多样性,而人工林则应增加树种多样性和林分密度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors driving carbon accumulation in forest biomass and soil organic carbon across natural forests and planted forests in China
Forests play a pivotal role within the global carbon cycle. However, how to enhance carbon storage in existing forests remains unclear.In this study, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of data from 2,948 forest sites across China. Utilizing structural equation modeling (SEM), we investigate the intricate relationship between climate, tree species diversity, stand structure, function traits, initial biomass carbon stocks (BCi), soil organic carbon stocks (Soil C content), and carbon accumulation in biomass (ΔBC) and soil organic carbon stocks (ΔSOC) within both natural forests (NF, n = 1,910) and planted forests (PF, n = 1,038).Our findings underscore the critical influence of tree species diversity and stand structure drivers of both direct and indirect carbon accumulation, with distinct drivers emerging based on the carbon pools in NF and PF. Specifically, increasing tree species diversity from its minimum to maximum value through management-results in a 14.798 tC/ha reduction in BC and 0.686 tC/ha in SOC in NF. Conversely, amplifies BC and SOC in PF by 0.338 tC/ha and 0.065 tC/ha, respectively. Enhancing stand structure-such as stand density-results in a 231.727 tC/ha reduction in BC and SOC in NF, and a 10.668 tC/ha in BC and 64.008 tC/ha increment in SOC in PF.Overall, our results indicate that higher tree species diversity, stand density and age-group limits further carbon accumulation in BC and SOC in current NF. In contrast, low tree species diversity and stand density limits the development of carbon storage potential in planted forests. To enhance carbon sequestration capacity, China should change its current policy of completely banning logging of natural forests. Natural forests need thinning and reduced tree species diversity, while planted forests should increase tree species diversity and stand density.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
256
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信