评估物理和虚拟空间中的课堂参与情况:当前的方法和问题

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Patricia D. Simon, Luke K. Fryer, Kaori Nakao
{"title":"评估物理和虚拟空间中的课堂参与情况:当前的方法和问题","authors":"Patricia D. Simon, Luke K. Fryer, Kaori Nakao","doi":"10.3389/feduc.2023.1306568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning occurs best when students are given opportunities to be active participants in the learning process. As assessment strategies are being forced to change in the era of Generative AI, and as digital technologies continue to integrate with education, it becomes imperative to gather information on current approaches to evaluating student participation. This mini-review aimed to identify existing methods used by higher education teachers to assess participation in both physical and virtual classrooms. It also aimed to identify common issues that are anticipated to impact future developments in this area. To achieve these objectives, articles were downloaded from the ERIC database. The search phrase “assessment of class participation” was utilized. Search was limited to peer-reviewed articles written in English. The educational level was limited to “higher education” and “postsecondary education” in the search. From the 2,320 articles that came up, titles and abstracts were screened and 65 articles were retained. After reading the full text, a total of 45 articles remained for analysis, all published between 2005 and 2023. Using thematic analysis, the following categories were formed: innovations in assessing class participation, criteria-related issues, and issue of fairness in assessing class participation. As education becomes more reliant on technology, we need to be cognizant of issues that came up in this review regarding inequity of educational access and opportunity, and to develop solutions that would promote equitable learning. We therefore call for more equity-focused innovation, policymaking, and pedagogy for more inclusive classroom environments. More implications and potential directions for research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":52290,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Education","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing class participation in physical and virtual spaces: current approaches and issues\",\"authors\":\"Patricia D. Simon, Luke K. Fryer, Kaori Nakao\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/feduc.2023.1306568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Learning occurs best when students are given opportunities to be active participants in the learning process. As assessment strategies are being forced to change in the era of Generative AI, and as digital technologies continue to integrate with education, it becomes imperative to gather information on current approaches to evaluating student participation. This mini-review aimed to identify existing methods used by higher education teachers to assess participation in both physical and virtual classrooms. It also aimed to identify common issues that are anticipated to impact future developments in this area. To achieve these objectives, articles were downloaded from the ERIC database. The search phrase “assessment of class participation” was utilized. Search was limited to peer-reviewed articles written in English. The educational level was limited to “higher education” and “postsecondary education” in the search. From the 2,320 articles that came up, titles and abstracts were screened and 65 articles were retained. After reading the full text, a total of 45 articles remained for analysis, all published between 2005 and 2023. Using thematic analysis, the following categories were formed: innovations in assessing class participation, criteria-related issues, and issue of fairness in assessing class participation. As education becomes more reliant on technology, we need to be cognizant of issues that came up in this review regarding inequity of educational access and opportunity, and to develop solutions that would promote equitable learning. We therefore call for more equity-focused innovation, policymaking, and pedagogy for more inclusive classroom environments. More implications and potential directions for research are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Education\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1306568\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1306568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当学生有机会积极参与学习过程时,学习效果最佳。在生成式人工智能时代,评估策略被迫改变,数字技术也在不断与教育融合,因此,收集有关当前评估学生参与度的方法的信息变得势在必行。本微型综述旨在确定高等教育教师在物理和虚拟课堂中评估参与度的现有方法。它还旨在确定预计会影响该领域未来发展的共同问题。为了实现这些目标,我们从 ERIC 数据库下载了相关文章。搜索关键词为 "课堂参与度评估"。搜索仅限于同行评审的英文文章。在搜索中,教育水平仅限于 "高等教育 "和 "中学后教育"。从搜索到的 2,320 篇文章中,对标题和摘要进行了筛选,保留了 65 篇文章。阅读全文后,共保留 45 篇文章进行分析,这些文章均发表于 2005 年至 2023 年之间。通过主题分析,形成了以下类别:评估课堂参与度的创新、标准相关问题以及评估课堂参与度的公平性问题。随着教育越来越依赖于技术,我们需要认识到本次回顾中出现的有关教育机会不平等的问题,并制定促进公平学习的解决方案。因此,我们呼吁更多注重公平的创新、政策制定和教学法,以营造更具包容性的课堂环境。我们还讨论了更多的影响和潜在的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing class participation in physical and virtual spaces: current approaches and issues
Learning occurs best when students are given opportunities to be active participants in the learning process. As assessment strategies are being forced to change in the era of Generative AI, and as digital technologies continue to integrate with education, it becomes imperative to gather information on current approaches to evaluating student participation. This mini-review aimed to identify existing methods used by higher education teachers to assess participation in both physical and virtual classrooms. It also aimed to identify common issues that are anticipated to impact future developments in this area. To achieve these objectives, articles were downloaded from the ERIC database. The search phrase “assessment of class participation” was utilized. Search was limited to peer-reviewed articles written in English. The educational level was limited to “higher education” and “postsecondary education” in the search. From the 2,320 articles that came up, titles and abstracts were screened and 65 articles were retained. After reading the full text, a total of 45 articles remained for analysis, all published between 2005 and 2023. Using thematic analysis, the following categories were formed: innovations in assessing class participation, criteria-related issues, and issue of fairness in assessing class participation. As education becomes more reliant on technology, we need to be cognizant of issues that came up in this review regarding inequity of educational access and opportunity, and to develop solutions that would promote equitable learning. We therefore call for more equity-focused innovation, policymaking, and pedagogy for more inclusive classroom environments. More implications and potential directions for research are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Education
Frontiers in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
887
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信