高等教育中的 YouTube:比较学生和教师的看法和做法

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Scott B. Greeves, Mustafa Oz
{"title":"高等教育中的 YouTube:比较学生和教师的看法和做法","authors":"Scott B. Greeves, Mustafa Oz","doi":"10.3389/feduc.2023.1330405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"YouTube is widely adopted in educational settings because it can support a variety of learning practices. However, unlike traditional learning resources, YouTube videos lack a standardized quality assurance process, posing a significant concern for educational users. The responsibility of identifying suitable educational content falls on the individual user as they navigate the site and select videos. Despite its importance, the multi-step process of video selection remains poorly understood among educational users. While it is established that most users begin with a keyword search for their topic of interest, there is limited empirical evidence on how users deliberate between returned video options, considering features such as view count and comment section sentiment, to make an informed video selection. To address this knowledge gap, this study surveyed college (1) instructors (N = 61) and (2) students (N = 300) to compare their prioritization of ten YouTube video features in relation to video selection. The results revealed fundamental similarities in their prioritization of key aspects such as accuracy, content creators’ expertise, video duration, and style. However, the analyses also suggest that instructors and students may value differing platform affordances across YouTube’s features.","PeriodicalId":52290,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Education","volume":"27 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"YouTube in higher education: comparing student and instructor perceptions and practices\",\"authors\":\"Scott B. Greeves, Mustafa Oz\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/feduc.2023.1330405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"YouTube is widely adopted in educational settings because it can support a variety of learning practices. However, unlike traditional learning resources, YouTube videos lack a standardized quality assurance process, posing a significant concern for educational users. The responsibility of identifying suitable educational content falls on the individual user as they navigate the site and select videos. Despite its importance, the multi-step process of video selection remains poorly understood among educational users. While it is established that most users begin with a keyword search for their topic of interest, there is limited empirical evidence on how users deliberate between returned video options, considering features such as view count and comment section sentiment, to make an informed video selection. To address this knowledge gap, this study surveyed college (1) instructors (N = 61) and (2) students (N = 300) to compare their prioritization of ten YouTube video features in relation to video selection. The results revealed fundamental similarities in their prioritization of key aspects such as accuracy, content creators’ expertise, video duration, and style. However, the analyses also suggest that instructors and students may value differing platform affordances across YouTube’s features.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Education\",\"volume\":\"27 24\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1330405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1330405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

YouTube 能够支持各种学习实践,因此在教育环境中被广泛采用。然而,与传统的学习资源不同,YouTube 视频缺乏标准化的质量保证流程,这给教育用户带来了极大的困扰。用户在浏览网站和选择视频时,有责任识别合适的教育内容。尽管视频选择非常重要,但教育用户对视频选择的多步骤过程仍然知之甚少。虽然大多数用户都会从关键词搜索开始,搜索他们感兴趣的主题,但关于用户如何在返回的视频选项中进行斟酌,并考虑浏览量和评论区情绪等特征,从而做出明智的视频选择,实证证据却很有限。为了填补这一知识空白,本研究调查了大学(1)教师(人数=61)和(2)学生(人数=300),比较了他们在选择视频时对十个 YouTube 视频特征的优先排序。结果显示,他们对准确性、内容创作者的专业性、视频时长和风格等关键方面的优先级排序基本相似。不过,分析也表明,教师和学生可能会重视 YouTube 各项功能的不同平台承受能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
YouTube in higher education: comparing student and instructor perceptions and practices
YouTube is widely adopted in educational settings because it can support a variety of learning practices. However, unlike traditional learning resources, YouTube videos lack a standardized quality assurance process, posing a significant concern for educational users. The responsibility of identifying suitable educational content falls on the individual user as they navigate the site and select videos. Despite its importance, the multi-step process of video selection remains poorly understood among educational users. While it is established that most users begin with a keyword search for their topic of interest, there is limited empirical evidence on how users deliberate between returned video options, considering features such as view count and comment section sentiment, to make an informed video selection. To address this knowledge gap, this study surveyed college (1) instructors (N = 61) and (2) students (N = 300) to compare their prioritization of ten YouTube video features in relation to video selection. The results revealed fundamental similarities in their prioritization of key aspects such as accuracy, content creators’ expertise, video duration, and style. However, the analyses also suggest that instructors and students may value differing platform affordances across YouTube’s features.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Education
Frontiers in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
887
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信