两本圣经之争：詹姆士王圣经》何时以及如何战胜《日内瓦圣经》？

IF 0.2 3区历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES

RENAISSANCE AND REFORMATION Pub Date : 2024-01-10 DOI:10.33137/rr.v46i2.42289

Hsing-Hao Chao

{"title":"两本圣经之争：詹姆士王圣经》何时以及如何战胜《日内瓦圣经》？","authors":"Hsing-Hao Chao","doi":"10.33137/rr.v46i2.42289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article addresses two questions: “When did the King James Bible gain a foothold of popularity among the English people?” and “How did the Geneva Bible lose its popularity to the King James Bible?” By reviewing the post-1611 printing of these two versions of the Bible and examining the texts of the Paul’s Cross sermons and the parliamentary sermons between 1612 and 1643, I find that the King James Bible was already more popular than the Geneva Bible by 1620, and that the rising trend of the popularity of the King James Bible had become irreversible by 1630. By 1640, the battle of the two Bibles was long over. I also refute the assumption that the political authorities’ suppression of the Geneva Bible caused its defeat. Rather, I argue that the decrease in consumer demand for exegetical notes led to the demise of the Geneva Bible.","PeriodicalId":43520,"journal":{"name":"RENAISSANCE AND REFORMATION","volume":"71 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Battle of Two Bibles: When and How Did the King James Bible Gain Its Popularity over the Geneva Bible?\",\"authors\":\"Hsing-Hao Chao\",\"doi\":\"10.33137/rr.v46i2.42289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article addresses two questions: “When did the King James Bible gain a foothold of popularity among the English people?” and “How did the Geneva Bible lose its popularity to the King James Bible?” By reviewing the post-1611 printing of these two versions of the Bible and examining the texts of the Paul’s Cross sermons and the parliamentary sermons between 1612 and 1643, I find that the King James Bible was already more popular than the Geneva Bible by 1620, and that the rising trend of the popularity of the King James Bible had become irreversible by 1630. By 1640, the battle of the two Bibles was long over. I also refute the assumption that the political authorities’ suppression of the Geneva Bible caused its defeat. Rather, I argue that the decrease in consumer demand for exegetical notes led to the demise of the Geneva Bible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RENAISSANCE AND REFORMATION\",\"volume\":\"71 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RENAISSANCE AND REFORMATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33137/rr.v46i2.42289\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RENAISSANCE AND REFORMATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/rr.v46i2.42289","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了两个问题："詹姆士王圣经》是何时在英国人中流行起来的？"以及"《日内瓦圣经》是如何输给《詹姆士王圣经》的？通过回顾 1611 年后这两个版本《圣经》的印刷情况，并研究 1612 年至 1643 年间保罗十字架布道会和议会布道会的文本，我发现，到 1620 年，《詹姆士王圣经》已经比《日内瓦圣经》更受欢迎，而到 1630 年，《詹姆士王圣经》受欢迎的上升趋势已经不可逆转。到 1640 年，两种《圣经》之争早已结束。我还反驳了政治当局压制《日内瓦圣经》导致其失败的假设。相反，我认为消费者对注释需求的减少导致了日内瓦圣经的消亡。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Battle of Two Bibles: When and How Did the King James Bible Gain Its Popularity over the Geneva Bible?

This article addresses two questions: “When did the King James Bible gain a foothold of popularity among the English people?” and “How did the Geneva Bible lose its popularity to the King James Bible?” By reviewing the post-1611 printing of these two versions of the Bible and examining the texts of the Paul’s Cross sermons and the parliamentary sermons between 1612 and 1643, I find that the King James Bible was already more popular than the Geneva Bible by 1620, and that the rising trend of the popularity of the King James Bible had become irreversible by 1630. By 1640, the battle of the two Bibles was long over. I also refute the assumption that the political authorities’ suppression of the Geneva Bible caused its defeat. Rather, I argue that the decrease in consumer demand for exegetical notes led to the demise of the Geneva Bible.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

RENAISSANCE AND REFORMATION MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

142

期刊介绍： The Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies (CRRS) is a research and teaching centre with a library devoted to the study of the period from approximately 1350 to 1700. The CRRS supervises an undergraduate program in Renaissance Studies, organizes lectures and seminars, and maintains an active series of publications.