偷猎与狩猎、冲突与健康:巴西塞拉多地区野生动物保护的人文因素

Roberta Montanheiro Paolino, Caroline Testa José, R. C. Fernandes-Santos, Mariana Bueno Landis, Gabriela Medeiros de Pinho, E. P. Medici
{"title":"偷猎与狩猎、冲突与健康:巴西塞拉多地区野生动物保护的人文因素","authors":"Roberta Montanheiro Paolino, Caroline Testa José, R. C. Fernandes-Santos, Mariana Bueno Landis, Gabriela Medeiros de Pinho, E. P. Medici","doi":"10.3389/fcosc.2023.1221206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding human-wildlife interactions is critical to overcoming the socio-environmental crises we face worldwide. Among these interactions, poaching and hunting, human-wildlife conflict, and transmission of zoonotic diseases are major causes of biodiversity loss and detrimental to human well-being. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze wildlife poaching, feral pig hunting, human-wildlife conflict, and health issues in a region of the Brazilian Cerrado, in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul. The study also focused on the lowland tapir (Tapirus terrestris), a poached species listed as vulnerable to extinction.From October 2016 to September 2017, we conducted face-to-face semi-structured interviews with 51 local people from nine stakeholder groups. Interview answers and additional information compiled during the study were evaluated using coding, narrative, and co-occurrence analyses.We found that the main human-wildlife conflict in the region involves feral pigs, and hunting is practiced as a population control strategy. The lowland tapir is not considered a conflictual species, as it is beloved by most people. However, tapirs are still poached, although less so than in the past, mainly for cultural reasons. Culture was the main motivation behind wildlife poaching in general. We identified 28 species and five taxa currently poached in this Cerrado region, of which 11 are used for medical and aphrodisiac purposes. Historically, wildlife poaching was linked to poor livelihood conditions and lack of support from governmental institutions during the Agrarian Reform process, becoming a cultural habit over the years. Nevertheless, wildlife poaching is less frequent than in the past, and its main barriers are surveillance, poaching prohibition by landowners, and social norm. Therefore, promoting a change in the way people relate to nature, meeting socioeconomic needs, and increasing surveillance appear to be important conservation strategies. Although feral pig hunting may replace wildlife poaching, some hunters still poach wild species, especially peccaries. Hence, it is necessary to keep hunters under surveillance, raise awareness among them, and make them allies in conservation strategies. We found a worryingly low level of awareness about disease transmission risk through bushmeat manipulation and consumption, highlighting the importance of One Health approaches.","PeriodicalId":484005,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in conservation science","volume":"3 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poaching and hunting, conflicts and health: human dimensions of wildlife conservation in the Brazilian Cerrado\",\"authors\":\"Roberta Montanheiro Paolino, Caroline Testa José, R. C. Fernandes-Santos, Mariana Bueno Landis, Gabriela Medeiros de Pinho, E. P. Medici\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fcosc.2023.1221206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding human-wildlife interactions is critical to overcoming the socio-environmental crises we face worldwide. Among these interactions, poaching and hunting, human-wildlife conflict, and transmission of zoonotic diseases are major causes of biodiversity loss and detrimental to human well-being. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze wildlife poaching, feral pig hunting, human-wildlife conflict, and health issues in a region of the Brazilian Cerrado, in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul. The study also focused on the lowland tapir (Tapirus terrestris), a poached species listed as vulnerable to extinction.From October 2016 to September 2017, we conducted face-to-face semi-structured interviews with 51 local people from nine stakeholder groups. Interview answers and additional information compiled during the study were evaluated using coding, narrative, and co-occurrence analyses.We found that the main human-wildlife conflict in the region involves feral pigs, and hunting is practiced as a population control strategy. The lowland tapir is not considered a conflictual species, as it is beloved by most people. However, tapirs are still poached, although less so than in the past, mainly for cultural reasons. Culture was the main motivation behind wildlife poaching in general. We identified 28 species and five taxa currently poached in this Cerrado region, of which 11 are used for medical and aphrodisiac purposes. Historically, wildlife poaching was linked to poor livelihood conditions and lack of support from governmental institutions during the Agrarian Reform process, becoming a cultural habit over the years. Nevertheless, wildlife poaching is less frequent than in the past, and its main barriers are surveillance, poaching prohibition by landowners, and social norm. Therefore, promoting a change in the way people relate to nature, meeting socioeconomic needs, and increasing surveillance appear to be important conservation strategies. Although feral pig hunting may replace wildlife poaching, some hunters still poach wild species, especially peccaries. Hence, it is necessary to keep hunters under surveillance, raise awareness among them, and make them allies in conservation strategies. We found a worryingly low level of awareness about disease transmission risk through bushmeat manipulation and consumption, highlighting the importance of One Health approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":484005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in conservation science\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in conservation science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2023.1221206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in conservation science","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2023.1221206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解人类与野生动物之间的相互作用对于克服我们在全球范围内面临的社会环境危机至关重要。在这些相互作用中,偷猎和狩猎、人类与野生动物的冲突以及人畜共患病的传播是造成生物多样性丧失和损害人类福祉的主要原因。因此,本研究旨在分析巴西南马托格罗索州塞拉多地区的野生动物偷猎、野猪狩猎、人类与野生动物冲突以及健康问题。从 2016 年 10 月到 2017 年 9 月,我们对来自 9 个利益相关群体的 51 名当地人进行了面对面的半结构化访谈。我们发现,该地区主要的人类与野生动物冲突涉及野猪,而狩猎是一种种群控制策略。低地貘不被认为是冲突物种,因为它受到大多数人的喜爱。然而,貘仍然遭到偷猎,尽管比过去有所减少,主要是出于文化原因。一般来说,文化是偷猎野生动物的主要动机。我们确定了目前在塞拉多地区被偷猎的 28 个物种和 5 个分类群,其中 11 个被用于医疗和壮阳目的。从历史上看,偷猎野生动物与农业改革过程中恶劣的生计条件和缺乏政府机构的支持有关,多年来已成为一种文化习惯。不过,现在偷猎野生动物的现象比过去有所减少,其主要障碍在于监督、土地所有者禁止偷猎以及社会规范。因此,促进人们改变与自然相处的方式、满足社会经济需求和加强监督似乎是重要的保护战略。尽管猎杀野猪可能会取代偷猎野生动物,但一些猎人仍然会偷猎野生物种,尤其是猯。因此,有必要对猎人进行监控,提高他们的意识,使他们成为保护战略的同盟。我们发现,人们对通过操纵和食用灌木肉传播疾病的风险认识水平之低令人担忧,这凸显了 "一体健康 "方法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Poaching and hunting, conflicts and health: human dimensions of wildlife conservation in the Brazilian Cerrado
Understanding human-wildlife interactions is critical to overcoming the socio-environmental crises we face worldwide. Among these interactions, poaching and hunting, human-wildlife conflict, and transmission of zoonotic diseases are major causes of biodiversity loss and detrimental to human well-being. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze wildlife poaching, feral pig hunting, human-wildlife conflict, and health issues in a region of the Brazilian Cerrado, in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul. The study also focused on the lowland tapir (Tapirus terrestris), a poached species listed as vulnerable to extinction.From October 2016 to September 2017, we conducted face-to-face semi-structured interviews with 51 local people from nine stakeholder groups. Interview answers and additional information compiled during the study were evaluated using coding, narrative, and co-occurrence analyses.We found that the main human-wildlife conflict in the region involves feral pigs, and hunting is practiced as a population control strategy. The lowland tapir is not considered a conflictual species, as it is beloved by most people. However, tapirs are still poached, although less so than in the past, mainly for cultural reasons. Culture was the main motivation behind wildlife poaching in general. We identified 28 species and five taxa currently poached in this Cerrado region, of which 11 are used for medical and aphrodisiac purposes. Historically, wildlife poaching was linked to poor livelihood conditions and lack of support from governmental institutions during the Agrarian Reform process, becoming a cultural habit over the years. Nevertheless, wildlife poaching is less frequent than in the past, and its main barriers are surveillance, poaching prohibition by landowners, and social norm. Therefore, promoting a change in the way people relate to nature, meeting socioeconomic needs, and increasing surveillance appear to be important conservation strategies. Although feral pig hunting may replace wildlife poaching, some hunters still poach wild species, especially peccaries. Hence, it is necessary to keep hunters under surveillance, raise awareness among them, and make them allies in conservation strategies. We found a worryingly low level of awareness about disease transmission risk through bushmeat manipulation and consumption, highlighting the importance of One Health approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信