多中心随机对照试验中数字式喘息检测器的临床疗效和满意度--喘息扫描研究

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Yen Hoang Do, Wim van Aalderen, Ellen Dellbrügger, Claude Grenzbach, Jonathan Grigg, Ulrike Grittner, Eric Haarman, Camilo José Hernandez Toro, Bulent Karadag, Siri Roßberg, Tina-Maria Weichert, Abigail L. Whitehouse, A. Pizzulli, Paolo Maria Matricardi, S. Dramburg
{"title":"多中心随机对照试验中数字式喘息检测器的临床疗效和满意度--喘息扫描研究","authors":"Yen Hoang Do, Wim van Aalderen, Ellen Dellbrügger, Claude Grenzbach, Jonathan Grigg, Ulrike Grittner, Eric Haarman, Camilo José Hernandez Toro, Bulent Karadag, Siri Roßberg, Tina-Maria Weichert, Abigail L. Whitehouse, A. Pizzulli, Paolo Maria Matricardi, S. Dramburg","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00518-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wheezing is common in pre-school children and its clinical assessment often challenging for caretakers. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a novel digital wheeze detector (WheezeScan™, OMRON Healthcare Co. Ltd, Japan) on disease control in a home care setting.A multicenter randomised open-labeled controlled trial was conducted in Berlin, Istanbul and London. Participants aged 4–84 months with a doctor's diagnosis of recurrent wheezing in the past 12 months were included. While the control group followed usual care, the intervention group received the WheezeScan™ for at home use for 120 days. Parents completed questionnaires regarding their child's respiratory symptoms, disease-related and parental quality of life, and caretaker self-efficacy at baseline (T0), 90 days (T1), and 4 months (T2).A total of 167 children, with a mean age of 3.2 years (sd1.6), were enrolled in the study (nintervention=87; ncontrol=80). There was no statistically significant difference in wheeze control assessed by TRACK (mean difference 3.8, 95% CI −2.3–9.9; p=0.2) at T1 between treatment groups (primary outcome). Children's and parental quality of life and parental self-efficacy were comparable between both groups at T1. The evaluation of device usability and perception showed that parents found it useful.In the current study population, the wheeze detector did not show significant impact on the home management of pre-school wheezing. Hence, further research is needed to better understand how the perception and usage behavior may influence the clinical impact of a digital support.","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":"9 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical efficacy and satisfaction of a digital wheeze detector in a multicenter randomised controlled trial – the WheezeScan study\",\"authors\":\"Yen Hoang Do, Wim van Aalderen, Ellen Dellbrügger, Claude Grenzbach, Jonathan Grigg, Ulrike Grittner, Eric Haarman, Camilo José Hernandez Toro, Bulent Karadag, Siri Roßberg, Tina-Maria Weichert, Abigail L. Whitehouse, A. Pizzulli, Paolo Maria Matricardi, S. Dramburg\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/23120541.00518-2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Wheezing is common in pre-school children and its clinical assessment often challenging for caretakers. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a novel digital wheeze detector (WheezeScan™, OMRON Healthcare Co. Ltd, Japan) on disease control in a home care setting.A multicenter randomised open-labeled controlled trial was conducted in Berlin, Istanbul and London. Participants aged 4–84 months with a doctor's diagnosis of recurrent wheezing in the past 12 months were included. While the control group followed usual care, the intervention group received the WheezeScan™ for at home use for 120 days. Parents completed questionnaires regarding their child's respiratory symptoms, disease-related and parental quality of life, and caretaker self-efficacy at baseline (T0), 90 days (T1), and 4 months (T2).A total of 167 children, with a mean age of 3.2 years (sd1.6), were enrolled in the study (nintervention=87; ncontrol=80). There was no statistically significant difference in wheeze control assessed by TRACK (mean difference 3.8, 95% CI −2.3–9.9; p=0.2) at T1 between treatment groups (primary outcome). Children's and parental quality of life and parental self-efficacy were comparable between both groups at T1. The evaluation of device usability and perception showed that parents found it useful.In the current study population, the wheeze detector did not show significant impact on the home management of pre-school wheezing. Hence, further research is needed to better understand how the perception and usage behavior may influence the clinical impact of a digital support.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"volume\":\"9 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00518-2023\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00518-2023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

喘息是学龄前儿童的常见病,其临床评估对看护者来说往往具有挑战性。这项研究旨在评估新型数字式喘息检测器(WheezeScan™,日本欧姆龙医疗保健有限公司)对家庭护理环境中疾病控制的影响。这项多中心随机开放标签对照试验在柏林、伊斯坦布尔和伦敦进行,参试者年龄为 4-84 个月,经医生诊断在过去 12 个月中反复出现喘息。对照组采用常规护理方法,干预组则在家中使用 WheezeScan™ 120 天。家长在基线(T0)、90天(T1)和4个月(T2)时填写了有关孩子呼吸道症状、疾病相关生活质量、家长生活质量和看护者自我效能的问卷。治疗组与对照组在TRACK评估的喘息控制率上没有明显差异(平均差异为3.8,95% CI -2.3-9.9;P=0.2)(主要结果)。儿童和家长的生活质量以及家长的自我效能在第一阶段两组之间不相上下。在目前的研究人群中,喘息检测器对学龄前儿童喘息的家庭管理并未产生显著影响。因此,要更好地了解感知和使用行为如何影响数字支持的临床效果,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical efficacy and satisfaction of a digital wheeze detector in a multicenter randomised controlled trial – the WheezeScan study
Wheezing is common in pre-school children and its clinical assessment often challenging for caretakers. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a novel digital wheeze detector (WheezeScan™, OMRON Healthcare Co. Ltd, Japan) on disease control in a home care setting.A multicenter randomised open-labeled controlled trial was conducted in Berlin, Istanbul and London. Participants aged 4–84 months with a doctor's diagnosis of recurrent wheezing in the past 12 months were included. While the control group followed usual care, the intervention group received the WheezeScan™ for at home use for 120 days. Parents completed questionnaires regarding their child's respiratory symptoms, disease-related and parental quality of life, and caretaker self-efficacy at baseline (T0), 90 days (T1), and 4 months (T2).A total of 167 children, with a mean age of 3.2 years (sd1.6), were enrolled in the study (nintervention=87; ncontrol=80). There was no statistically significant difference in wheeze control assessed by TRACK (mean difference 3.8, 95% CI −2.3–9.9; p=0.2) at T1 between treatment groups (primary outcome). Children's and parental quality of life and parental self-efficacy were comparable between both groups at T1. The evaluation of device usability and perception showed that parents found it useful.In the current study population, the wheeze detector did not show significant impact on the home management of pre-school wheezing. Hence, further research is needed to better understand how the perception and usage behavior may influence the clinical impact of a digital support.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信