为具有移动浸没边界的系统建立物理信息神经网络模型:将神经网络应用于经过垂悬箔的非稳定流

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Rahul Sundar , Dipanjan Majumdar , Didier Lucor , Sunetra Sarkar
{"title":"为具有移动浸没边界的系统建立物理信息神经网络模型:将神经网络应用于经过垂悬箔的非稳定流","authors":"Rahul Sundar ,&nbsp;Dipanjan Majumdar ,&nbsp;Didier Lucor ,&nbsp;Sunetra Sarkar","doi":"10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2024.104066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Physics informed neural networks (PINNs) have been explored extensively in the recent past for solving various forward and inverse problems for facilitating querying applications in fluid mechanics. However, investigations on PINNs for unsteady flows<span> past moving bodies, such as flapping wings are scarce. Earlier studies mostly relied on transferring the problems to a body-attached frame of reference, which could be restrictive towards handling multiple moving bodies/deforming structures. The present study attempts to couple the benefits of PINNs with a fixed Eulerian frame<span> of reference, and proposes an immersed boundary aware framework for developing surrogate models for unsteady flows past moving bodies. Specifically, high-resolution velocity reconstruction and pressure recovery as a hidden variable are the main goals. The framework has been developed by using downsampled velocity data obtained from prior simulations to train the PINNs model. The efficacy of the velocity reconstruction has been tested against high resolution </span></span></span>IBM<span> simulation data, whereas the efficacy of the pressure recovery has been tested against high resolution simulation data from an arbitrary Lagrange Eulerian (ALE) solver. Under the present framework, two PINN variants, (i) a moving-boundary-enabled standard Navier–Stokes based PINN (MB-PINN), and, (ii) a moving-boundary-enabled IBM based PINN (MB-IBM-PINN) have been formulated.</span></p><p>Relaxation of physics constraints in PINNs models has been identified to be a useful strategy in improving the predictions. A fluid-solid partitioning of the physics losses in MB-IBM-PINN has been allowed, in order to investigate the effects of solid body points while training. This strategy enables MB-IBM-PINN to match with the performance of MB-PINN under certain loss-weighting conditions. Interestingly, MB-PINN is found to be superior to MB-IBM-PINN when <em>a priori</em> knowledge of the solid body position and velocity is available. To improve the data efficiency of MB-PINN, a physics based data sampling technique has also been investigated. It is observed that a suitable combination of physics constraint relaxation and physics based sampling can achieve a model performance comparable to the case of using all the data points, under a fixed training budget.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fluids and Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physics-informed neural networks modelling for systems with moving immersed boundaries: Application to an unsteady flow past a plunging foil\",\"authors\":\"Rahul Sundar ,&nbsp;Dipanjan Majumdar ,&nbsp;Didier Lucor ,&nbsp;Sunetra Sarkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2024.104066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Physics informed neural networks (PINNs) have been explored extensively in the recent past for solving various forward and inverse problems for facilitating querying applications in fluid mechanics. However, investigations on PINNs for unsteady flows<span> past moving bodies, such as flapping wings are scarce. Earlier studies mostly relied on transferring the problems to a body-attached frame of reference, which could be restrictive towards handling multiple moving bodies/deforming structures. The present study attempts to couple the benefits of PINNs with a fixed Eulerian frame<span> of reference, and proposes an immersed boundary aware framework for developing surrogate models for unsteady flows past moving bodies. Specifically, high-resolution velocity reconstruction and pressure recovery as a hidden variable are the main goals. The framework has been developed by using downsampled velocity data obtained from prior simulations to train the PINNs model. The efficacy of the velocity reconstruction has been tested against high resolution </span></span></span>IBM<span> simulation data, whereas the efficacy of the pressure recovery has been tested against high resolution simulation data from an arbitrary Lagrange Eulerian (ALE) solver. Under the present framework, two PINN variants, (i) a moving-boundary-enabled standard Navier–Stokes based PINN (MB-PINN), and, (ii) a moving-boundary-enabled IBM based PINN (MB-IBM-PINN) have been formulated.</span></p><p>Relaxation of physics constraints in PINNs models has been identified to be a useful strategy in improving the predictions. A fluid-solid partitioning of the physics losses in MB-IBM-PINN has been allowed, in order to investigate the effects of solid body points while training. This strategy enables MB-IBM-PINN to match with the performance of MB-PINN under certain loss-weighting conditions. Interestingly, MB-PINN is found to be superior to MB-IBM-PINN when <em>a priori</em> knowledge of the solid body position and velocity is available. To improve the data efficiency of MB-PINN, a physics based data sampling technique has also been investigated. It is observed that a suitable combination of physics constraint relaxation and physics based sampling can achieve a model performance comparable to the case of using all the data points, under a fixed training budget.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Fluids and Structures\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Fluids and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088997462400001X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fluids and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088997462400001X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,人们对物理信息神经网络(PINNs)进行了广泛的探索,以解决各种正向和反向问题,促进流体力学的查询应用。然而,针对经过运动体(如拍打翅膀)的非稳态流的 PINNs 研究却很少。早期的研究大多依赖于将问题转移到与机体相连的参照系中,这对于处理多个运动体/变形结构有一定限制。本研究试图将 PINNs 的优点与固定欧拉参照系相结合,并提出了一个沉浸边界感知框架,用于开发经过运动体的非稳态流的代用模型。具体来说,高分辨率速度重建和作为隐藏变量的压力恢复是主要目标。该框架是通过使用从先前模拟中获得的下采样速度数据来训练 PINNs 模型而开发的。根据高分辨率 IBM 仿真数据对速度重建的功效进行了测试,而根据任意拉格朗日欧拉(ALE)求解器的高分辨率仿真数据对压力恢复的功效进行了测试。在本框架下,制定了两种 PINN 变体:(i) 基于移动边界的标准纳维-斯托克斯 PINN(MB-PINN)和 (ii) 基于移动边界的 IBM PINN(MB-IBM-PINN)。在 MB-IBM-PINN 中允许对物理损失进行流体-固体分区,以便在训练时研究固体体点的影响。这种策略使 MB-IBM-PINN 在某些损失加权条件下与 MB-PINN 的性能相匹配。有趣的是,在获得实体位置和速度的先验知识后,发现 MB-PINN 优于 MB-IBM-PINN。为了提高 MB-PINN 的数据效率,还研究了一种基于物理的数据采样技术。结果表明,在固定的训练预算下,物理约束松弛和基于物理的采样的适当结合可以实现与使用所有数据点情况下相当的模型性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physics-informed neural networks modelling for systems with moving immersed boundaries: Application to an unsteady flow past a plunging foil

Physics informed neural networks (PINNs) have been explored extensively in the recent past for solving various forward and inverse problems for facilitating querying applications in fluid mechanics. However, investigations on PINNs for unsteady flows past moving bodies, such as flapping wings are scarce. Earlier studies mostly relied on transferring the problems to a body-attached frame of reference, which could be restrictive towards handling multiple moving bodies/deforming structures. The present study attempts to couple the benefits of PINNs with a fixed Eulerian frame of reference, and proposes an immersed boundary aware framework for developing surrogate models for unsteady flows past moving bodies. Specifically, high-resolution velocity reconstruction and pressure recovery as a hidden variable are the main goals. The framework has been developed by using downsampled velocity data obtained from prior simulations to train the PINNs model. The efficacy of the velocity reconstruction has been tested against high resolution IBM simulation data, whereas the efficacy of the pressure recovery has been tested against high resolution simulation data from an arbitrary Lagrange Eulerian (ALE) solver. Under the present framework, two PINN variants, (i) a moving-boundary-enabled standard Navier–Stokes based PINN (MB-PINN), and, (ii) a moving-boundary-enabled IBM based PINN (MB-IBM-PINN) have been formulated.

Relaxation of physics constraints in PINNs models has been identified to be a useful strategy in improving the predictions. A fluid-solid partitioning of the physics losses in MB-IBM-PINN has been allowed, in order to investigate the effects of solid body points while training. This strategy enables MB-IBM-PINN to match with the performance of MB-PINN under certain loss-weighting conditions. Interestingly, MB-PINN is found to be superior to MB-IBM-PINN when a priori knowledge of the solid body position and velocity is available. To improve the data efficiency of MB-PINN, a physics based data sampling technique has also been investigated. It is observed that a suitable combination of physics constraint relaxation and physics based sampling can achieve a model performance comparable to the case of using all the data points, under a fixed training budget.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Fluids and Structures
Journal of Fluids and Structures 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
173
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Fluids and Structures serves as a focal point and a forum for the exchange of ideas, for the many kinds of specialists and practitioners concerned with fluid–structure interactions and the dynamics of systems related thereto, in any field. One of its aims is to foster the cross–fertilization of ideas, methods and techniques in the various disciplines involved. The journal publishes papers that present original and significant contributions on all aspects of the mechanical interactions between fluids and solids, regardless of scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信