{"title":"比较深度学习方法对不同牙周炎阶段患者的放射学检测。","authors":"Berceste Guler Ayyildiz, Rukiye Karakis, Busra Terzioglu, Durmus Ozdemir","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twad003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to assess the accuracy of computer-assisted periodontal classification bone loss staging using deep learning (DL) methods on panoramic radiographs and to compare the performance of various models and layers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Panoramic radiographs were diagnosed and classified into 3 groups, namely \"healthy,\" \"Stage1/2,\" and \"Stage3/4,\" and stored in separate folders. The feature extraction stage involved transferring and retraining the feature extraction layers and weights from 3 models, namely ResNet50, DenseNet121, and InceptionV3, which were proposed for classifying the ImageNet dataset, to 3 DL models designed for classifying periodontal bone loss. The features obtained from global average pooling (GAP), global max pooling (GMP), or flatten layers (FL) of convolutional neural network (CNN) models were used as input to the 8 different machine learning (ML) models. In addition, the features obtained from the GAP, GMP, or FL of the DL models were reduced using the minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) method and then classified again with 8 ML models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2533 panoramic radiographs, including 721 in the healthy group, 842 in the Stage1/2 group, and 970 in the Stage3/4 group, were included in the dataset. The average performance values of DenseNet121 + GAP-based and DenseNet121 + GAP + mRMR-based ML techniques on 10 subdatasets and ML models developed using 2 feature selection techniques outperformed CNN models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new DenseNet121 + GAP + mRMR-based support vector machine model developed in this study achieved higher performance in periodontal bone loss classification compared to other models in the literature by detecting effective features from raw images without the need for manual selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":"53 1","pages":"32-42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11003609/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of deep learning methods for the radiographic detection of patients with different periodontitis stages.\",\"authors\":\"Berceste Guler Ayyildiz, Rukiye Karakis, Busra Terzioglu, Durmus Ozdemir\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/dmfr/twad003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to assess the accuracy of computer-assisted periodontal classification bone loss staging using deep learning (DL) methods on panoramic radiographs and to compare the performance of various models and layers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Panoramic radiographs were diagnosed and classified into 3 groups, namely \\\"healthy,\\\" \\\"Stage1/2,\\\" and \\\"Stage3/4,\\\" and stored in separate folders. The feature extraction stage involved transferring and retraining the feature extraction layers and weights from 3 models, namely ResNet50, DenseNet121, and InceptionV3, which were proposed for classifying the ImageNet dataset, to 3 DL models designed for classifying periodontal bone loss. The features obtained from global average pooling (GAP), global max pooling (GMP), or flatten layers (FL) of convolutional neural network (CNN) models were used as input to the 8 different machine learning (ML) models. In addition, the features obtained from the GAP, GMP, or FL of the DL models were reduced using the minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) method and then classified again with 8 ML models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2533 panoramic radiographs, including 721 in the healthy group, 842 in the Stage1/2 group, and 970 in the Stage3/4 group, were included in the dataset. The average performance values of DenseNet121 + GAP-based and DenseNet121 + GAP + mRMR-based ML techniques on 10 subdatasets and ML models developed using 2 feature selection techniques outperformed CNN models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new DenseNet121 + GAP + mRMR-based support vector machine model developed in this study achieved higher performance in periodontal bone loss classification compared to other models in the literature by detecting effective features from raw images without the need for manual selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"32-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11003609/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twad003\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twad003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的本研究旨在评估使用深度学习(DL)方法对全景X光片进行计算机辅助牙周分类骨质流失分期的准确性,并比较各种模型和层的性能:对全景X光片进行诊断,并将其分为3组,即 "健康"、"1/2期 "和 "3/4期",分别存储在不同的文件夹中。特征提取阶段包括将用于ImageNet数据集分类的3个模型(即ResNet50、DenseNet121和InceptionV3)的特征提取层和权重转移到用于牙周骨质流失分类的3个DL模型,并对其进行再训练。从卷积神经网络(CNN)模型的全局平均池化(GAP)、全局最大池化(GMP)或扁平化层(FL)获得的特征被用作 8 个不同机器学习(ML)模型的输入。此外,使用最小冗余最大相关性(mRMR)方法对从卷积神经网络模型的 GAP、GMP 或 FL 中获得的特征进行缩减,然后用 8 个 ML 模型再次进行分类:数据集共包含 2533 张全景照片,其中健康组 721 张,1/2 期组 842 张,3/4 期组 970 张。基于 DenseNet121 + GAP 和基于 DenseNet121 + GAP + mRMR 的 ML 技术在 10 个子数据集上的平均性能值以及使用 2 种特征选择技术开发的 ML 模型的性能均优于 CNN 模型:本研究开发的基于 DenseNet121 + GAP + mRMR 的支持向量机模型无需人工选择,就能从原始图像中检测出有效特征,与文献中的其他模型相比,该模型在牙周骨缺失分类中取得了更高的性能。
Comparison of deep learning methods for the radiographic detection of patients with different periodontitis stages.
Objectives: The objective of this study is to assess the accuracy of computer-assisted periodontal classification bone loss staging using deep learning (DL) methods on panoramic radiographs and to compare the performance of various models and layers.
Methods: Panoramic radiographs were diagnosed and classified into 3 groups, namely "healthy," "Stage1/2," and "Stage3/4," and stored in separate folders. The feature extraction stage involved transferring and retraining the feature extraction layers and weights from 3 models, namely ResNet50, DenseNet121, and InceptionV3, which were proposed for classifying the ImageNet dataset, to 3 DL models designed for classifying periodontal bone loss. The features obtained from global average pooling (GAP), global max pooling (GMP), or flatten layers (FL) of convolutional neural network (CNN) models were used as input to the 8 different machine learning (ML) models. In addition, the features obtained from the GAP, GMP, or FL of the DL models were reduced using the minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) method and then classified again with 8 ML models.
Results: A total of 2533 panoramic radiographs, including 721 in the healthy group, 842 in the Stage1/2 group, and 970 in the Stage3/4 group, were included in the dataset. The average performance values of DenseNet121 + GAP-based and DenseNet121 + GAP + mRMR-based ML techniques on 10 subdatasets and ML models developed using 2 feature selection techniques outperformed CNN models.
Conclusions: The new DenseNet121 + GAP + mRMR-based support vector machine model developed in this study achieved higher performance in periodontal bone loss classification compared to other models in the literature by detecting effective features from raw images without the need for manual selection.
期刊介绍:
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging.
Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology.
The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919
- Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks
- Open access option
- ISSN: 0250-832X
- eISSN: 1476-542X