西班牙基层医疗社会服务专业背景下的街道官僚

IF 1.2 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
Sergio Sánchez-Castiñeira
{"title":"西班牙基层医疗社会服务专业背景下的街道官僚","authors":"Sergio Sánchez-Castiñeira","doi":"10.1108/ijssp-04-2023-0091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to identify the street-level approaches of professional workers in complex public social service organisations when attending to social assistance claimants.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The study employed a multifaceted approach comprising documentary analysis, semi-structured individual interviews (17) and focus group discussions (8) with qualified frontline social workers from primary care social services in Tarragona.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Social workers embodied three specific sets of cognitive, normative and emotional dispositions when attending to people with low incomes. First, the compassionate approach conceives clients as defensive regarding social services and emotionally vulnerable because of deprivation. Second, the instructional approach frames clients as being baffled by a new, precarious, institutional and economic context. They also lack information, abilities and the proper mindset to conceive of and attain available welfare and occupational resources. Third, the enforcement approach tends to define clients as suspicious, trying to obtain an excessive and unfair advantage of the welfare system that would eventually hamper their social opportunities.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Research thus far has tended to define public social assistance programmes in Southern welfare state contexts as mostly inefficient and hardly relevant residual social policies. The street-level approach shows that social workers try to resist the mere administrative processing of benefits, which is a professionally troubling and organisationally unsustainable way to proceed. They attempt to help clients by providing inclusive content in order to implement their benefits.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47193,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Street-level bureaucrats in the professional context of primary care social services in Spain\",\"authors\":\"Sergio Sánchez-Castiñeira\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijssp-04-2023-0091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This study aims to identify the street-level approaches of professional workers in complex public social service organisations when attending to social assistance claimants.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The study employed a multifaceted approach comprising documentary analysis, semi-structured individual interviews (17) and focus group discussions (8) with qualified frontline social workers from primary care social services in Tarragona.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Social workers embodied three specific sets of cognitive, normative and emotional dispositions when attending to people with low incomes. First, the compassionate approach conceives clients as defensive regarding social services and emotionally vulnerable because of deprivation. Second, the instructional approach frames clients as being baffled by a new, precarious, institutional and economic context. They also lack information, abilities and the proper mindset to conceive of and attain available welfare and occupational resources. Third, the enforcement approach tends to define clients as suspicious, trying to obtain an excessive and unfair advantage of the welfare system that would eventually hamper their social opportunities.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>Research thus far has tended to define public social assistance programmes in Southern welfare state contexts as mostly inefficient and hardly relevant residual social policies. The street-level approach shows that social workers try to resist the mere administrative processing of benefits, which is a professionally troubling and organisationally unsustainable way to proceed. They attempt to help clients by providing inclusive content in order to implement their benefits.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijssp-04-2023-0091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijssp-04-2023-0091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定复杂的公共社会服务组织中的专业工作人员在接待社会援助申请者时所采取的街头工作方法。研究采用了一种多层面的方法,包括文献分析、半结构式个人访谈(17 人)和焦点小组讨论(8 人),访谈对象是塔拉戈纳基层医疗社会服务机构的合格一线社会工作者。首先,"同情 "方法认为服务对象对社会服务有抵触情绪,并因贫困而在情感上易受伤害。其次,指导性方法认为服务对象对新的、不稳定的制度和经济环境感到困惑。他们还缺乏信息、能力和正确的心态来构想和获取可用的福利和职业资源。第三,执行方法倾向于将受助者定义为多疑的人,他们试图从福利制度中获取过度的、不公平的利益,而这种利益最终会阻碍他们的社会机会。街头研究表明,社会工作者试图抵制仅仅通过行政手段来处理福利问题的做法,这种做法在专业上令人不安,在组织上也难以为继。他们试图通过提供包容性的内容来帮助服务对象落实福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Street-level bureaucrats in the professional context of primary care social services in Spain

Purpose

This study aims to identify the street-level approaches of professional workers in complex public social service organisations when attending to social assistance claimants.

Design/methodology/approach

The study employed a multifaceted approach comprising documentary analysis, semi-structured individual interviews (17) and focus group discussions (8) with qualified frontline social workers from primary care social services in Tarragona.

Findings

Social workers embodied three specific sets of cognitive, normative and emotional dispositions when attending to people with low incomes. First, the compassionate approach conceives clients as defensive regarding social services and emotionally vulnerable because of deprivation. Second, the instructional approach frames clients as being baffled by a new, precarious, institutional and economic context. They also lack information, abilities and the proper mindset to conceive of and attain available welfare and occupational resources. Third, the enforcement approach tends to define clients as suspicious, trying to obtain an excessive and unfair advantage of the welfare system that would eventually hamper their social opportunities.

Originality/value

Research thus far has tended to define public social assistance programmes in Southern welfare state contexts as mostly inefficient and hardly relevant residual social policies. The street-level approach shows that social workers try to resist the mere administrative processing of benefits, which is a professionally troubling and organisationally unsustainable way to proceed. They attempt to help clients by providing inclusive content in order to implement their benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信