{"title":"互联网平台企业社会责任风险形成机制的模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)研究","authors":"Tongfang Lyu, Qitaisong Shen","doi":"10.1007/s12525-023-00686-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the realm of the digital economy, platform-based Internet companies leverage characteristics such as “cross-side effects” and “emerging technologies” to gain a competitive edge. However, simultaneously, they encounter challenges linked to inadequate risk management and insufficient focus on social responsibility. However, the discussions surrounding these matters have primarily been confined to case studies, lacking a comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms that give rise to social responsibility risks. This research addresses this gap by establishing a database of corporate social responsibility risks for Internet platform companies and employs a qualitative comparative analysis method to dissect these social responsibility risks. The study unveils that Internet platform companies can navigate low social responsibility risks through three distinct pathways: the “resource-experience combining type,” the “long-term shareholder-orientation type,” and the “novel innovative advantage type.” It delves into the questions of what Internet platform companies should do and how they should approach corporate social responsibility in varying contexts. Furthermore, it identifies novel strategies within the domain of platform organizations and the platform economy, thus expanding the conceptual framework of corporate social responsibility driving mechanisms. This research offers valuable guidance for government policy development directed at fostering the sustainable growth of Internet platforms. Additionally, it provides platform companies with insights into optimizing their approaches to manage social responsibility risks in alignment with their unique characteristics. Ultimately, it serves as a robust theoretical guide and practical illustration for addressing these pivotal issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":47719,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Markets","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) study on the formation mechanism of Internet platform companies’ social responsibility risks\",\"authors\":\"Tongfang Lyu, Qitaisong Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12525-023-00686-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In the realm of the digital economy, platform-based Internet companies leverage characteristics such as “cross-side effects” and “emerging technologies” to gain a competitive edge. However, simultaneously, they encounter challenges linked to inadequate risk management and insufficient focus on social responsibility. However, the discussions surrounding these matters have primarily been confined to case studies, lacking a comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms that give rise to social responsibility risks. This research addresses this gap by establishing a database of corporate social responsibility risks for Internet platform companies and employs a qualitative comparative analysis method to dissect these social responsibility risks. The study unveils that Internet platform companies can navigate low social responsibility risks through three distinct pathways: the “resource-experience combining type,” the “long-term shareholder-orientation type,” and the “novel innovative advantage type.” It delves into the questions of what Internet platform companies should do and how they should approach corporate social responsibility in varying contexts. Furthermore, it identifies novel strategies within the domain of platform organizations and the platform economy, thus expanding the conceptual framework of corporate social responsibility driving mechanisms. This research offers valuable guidance for government policy development directed at fostering the sustainable growth of Internet platforms. Additionally, it provides platform companies with insights into optimizing their approaches to manage social responsibility risks in alignment with their unique characteristics. Ultimately, it serves as a robust theoretical guide and practical illustration for addressing these pivotal issues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Markets\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Markets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00686-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Markets","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00686-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) study on the formation mechanism of Internet platform companies’ social responsibility risks
In the realm of the digital economy, platform-based Internet companies leverage characteristics such as “cross-side effects” and “emerging technologies” to gain a competitive edge. However, simultaneously, they encounter challenges linked to inadequate risk management and insufficient focus on social responsibility. However, the discussions surrounding these matters have primarily been confined to case studies, lacking a comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms that give rise to social responsibility risks. This research addresses this gap by establishing a database of corporate social responsibility risks for Internet platform companies and employs a qualitative comparative analysis method to dissect these social responsibility risks. The study unveils that Internet platform companies can navigate low social responsibility risks through three distinct pathways: the “resource-experience combining type,” the “long-term shareholder-orientation type,” and the “novel innovative advantage type.” It delves into the questions of what Internet platform companies should do and how they should approach corporate social responsibility in varying contexts. Furthermore, it identifies novel strategies within the domain of platform organizations and the platform economy, thus expanding the conceptual framework of corporate social responsibility driving mechanisms. This research offers valuable guidance for government policy development directed at fostering the sustainable growth of Internet platforms. Additionally, it provides platform companies with insights into optimizing their approaches to manage social responsibility risks in alignment with their unique characteristics. Ultimately, it serves as a robust theoretical guide and practical illustration for addressing these pivotal issues.
期刊介绍:
Electronic Markets (EM) stands as a premier academic journal providing a dynamic platform for research into various forms of networked business. Recognizing the pivotal role of information and communication technology (ICT), EM delves into how ICT transforms the interactions between organizations and customers across diverse domains such as social networks, electronic commerce, supply chain management, and customer relationship management.
Electronic markets, in essence, encompass the realms of networked business where multiple suppliers and customers engage in economic transactions within single or multiple tiers of economic value chains. This broad concept encompasses various forms, including allocation platforms with dynamic price discovery mechanisms, fostering atomistic relationships. Notable examples originate from financial markets (e.g., CBOT, XETRA) and energy markets (e.g., EEX, ICE). Join us in exploring the multifaceted landscape of electronic markets and their transformative impact on business interactions and dynamics.