{"title":"精神分裂的董事会秘书:多方利益相关者与财务不当行为之间的嵌入式代理","authors":"Bin Liu , David Ahlstrom , Yutong Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2024.101323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><span>While agency theory has long informed both research and practice in emphasizing good corporate governance in preventing financial misconduct, monitoring bodies do not always function so well, especially </span>in transition economies<span>. By integrating the stakeholder-agency perspective with prospect theory, this study provides a new explanation of such dysfunction by introducing an embedded agent concept that manifests a “schizophrenic” status of agents which creates a need to satisfy multiple stakeholders and their conflicting interests. Drawing on a sample of small-to-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) listed on the Chinese National Equities and Exchange and Quotations system from 2014 to 2017, it is shown that having a board secretary did not help reduce financial misconduct as the government had hoped, because of an embedded agent problem. However, their dysfunctional status would largely disappear, and they would perform their monitoring responsibilities if given higher equity shares and stricter subnational regulations -- two key contingencies that better align embedded agents’ interests with one group of stakeholders. Overall, this study contributes to the corporate governance literature by introducing the embedded agent concept and its theoretical boundaries, along with a focus on transition economies.</span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":47996,"journal":{"name":"British Accounting Review","volume":"57 4","pages":"Article 101323"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The schizophrenic board secretary: An embedded agent between multiple stakeholders and financial misconduct\",\"authors\":\"Bin Liu , David Ahlstrom , Yutong Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bar.2024.101323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><span>While agency theory has long informed both research and practice in emphasizing good corporate governance in preventing financial misconduct, monitoring bodies do not always function so well, especially </span>in transition economies<span>. By integrating the stakeholder-agency perspective with prospect theory, this study provides a new explanation of such dysfunction by introducing an embedded agent concept that manifests a “schizophrenic” status of agents which creates a need to satisfy multiple stakeholders and their conflicting interests. Drawing on a sample of small-to-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) listed on the Chinese National Equities and Exchange and Quotations system from 2014 to 2017, it is shown that having a board secretary did not help reduce financial misconduct as the government had hoped, because of an embedded agent problem. However, their dysfunctional status would largely disappear, and they would perform their monitoring responsibilities if given higher equity shares and stricter subnational regulations -- two key contingencies that better align embedded agents’ interests with one group of stakeholders. Overall, this study contributes to the corporate governance literature by introducing the embedded agent concept and its theoretical boundaries, along with a focus on transition economies.</span></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Accounting Review\",\"volume\":\"57 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 101323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Accounting Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838924000234\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838924000234","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The schizophrenic board secretary: An embedded agent between multiple stakeholders and financial misconduct
While agency theory has long informed both research and practice in emphasizing good corporate governance in preventing financial misconduct, monitoring bodies do not always function so well, especially in transition economies. By integrating the stakeholder-agency perspective with prospect theory, this study provides a new explanation of such dysfunction by introducing an embedded agent concept that manifests a “schizophrenic” status of agents which creates a need to satisfy multiple stakeholders and their conflicting interests. Drawing on a sample of small-to-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) listed on the Chinese National Equities and Exchange and Quotations system from 2014 to 2017, it is shown that having a board secretary did not help reduce financial misconduct as the government had hoped, because of an embedded agent problem. However, their dysfunctional status would largely disappear, and they would perform their monitoring responsibilities if given higher equity shares and stricter subnational regulations -- two key contingencies that better align embedded agents’ interests with one group of stakeholders. Overall, this study contributes to the corporate governance literature by introducing the embedded agent concept and its theoretical boundaries, along with a focus on transition economies.
期刊介绍:
The British Accounting Review*is pleased to publish original scholarly papers across the whole spectrum of accounting and finance. The journal is eclectic and pluralistic and contributions are welcomed across a wide range of research methodologies (e.g. analytical, archival, experimental, survey and qualitative case methods) and topics (e.g. financial accounting, management accounting, finance and financial management, auditing, public sector accounting, social and environmental accounting; accounting education and accounting history), evidence from UK and non-UK sources are equally acceptable.