Gianluca Cinotti, Francesca Romana Ripani, Beatrice Perciballi, Giuseppe La Torre, Giuseppe Giannicola
{"title":"使用双胫骨切口的全膝关节置换术中完全保留后十字韧带的比例更高:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。","authors":"Gianluca Cinotti, Francesca Romana Ripani, Beatrice Perciballi, Giuseppe La Torre, Giuseppe Giannicola","doi":"10.1186/s43019-023-00208-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty, posterior cruciate ligament damage may occur during tibial cutting. A prospective randomized study was conducted to investigate whether a novel tibial cutting technique was more effective than the currently used techniques.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients undergoing cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty were recruited in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. In 25 patients (group 1) the tibial cut was performed using a double tibial cut technique; in 25 (group 2) and 25 (group 3) patients, the bone island and en bloc resection techniques were performed, respectively. Posterior cruciate ligament integrity and femoral rollback were assessed at the end of surgery. The Oxford Knee Score, WOMAC score and range of motion were assessed postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Posterior cruciate ligament was completely preserved in 92% of patients in group 1 and in 64% in group 2 and 3, respectively (p = 0.03). The Oxford Knee Score and WOMAC scores did not differ between groups (p = 0.4). The mean knee flexion was 126.4°, 121.5° and 123.9° in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p = 0.04). The femoral rollback at 120° flexion was 80.7%, 72.2% and 75.4% in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The double cut technique preserves the posterior cruciate ligament at significantly higher rates than the bone island or en bloc resection techniques. Better posterior cruciate ligament preservation may improve the femoral rollback and knee flexion.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prospective randomized controlled trial, Level I.</p>","PeriodicalId":36317,"journal":{"name":"Knee Surgery and Related Research","volume":"36 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10777558/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Higher rates of fully preserved posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty using a double tibial cut: a prospective randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Gianluca Cinotti, Francesca Romana Ripani, Beatrice Perciballi, Giuseppe La Torre, Giuseppe Giannicola\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43019-023-00208-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty, posterior cruciate ligament damage may occur during tibial cutting. A prospective randomized study was conducted to investigate whether a novel tibial cutting technique was more effective than the currently used techniques.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients undergoing cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty were recruited in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. In 25 patients (group 1) the tibial cut was performed using a double tibial cut technique; in 25 (group 2) and 25 (group 3) patients, the bone island and en bloc resection techniques were performed, respectively. Posterior cruciate ligament integrity and femoral rollback were assessed at the end of surgery. The Oxford Knee Score, WOMAC score and range of motion were assessed postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Posterior cruciate ligament was completely preserved in 92% of patients in group 1 and in 64% in group 2 and 3, respectively (p = 0.03). The Oxford Knee Score and WOMAC scores did not differ between groups (p = 0.4). The mean knee flexion was 126.4°, 121.5° and 123.9° in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p = 0.04). The femoral rollback at 120° flexion was 80.7%, 72.2% and 75.4% in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The double cut technique preserves the posterior cruciate ligament at significantly higher rates than the bone island or en bloc resection techniques. Better posterior cruciate ligament preservation may improve the femoral rollback and knee flexion.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prospective randomized controlled trial, Level I.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee Surgery and Related Research\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10777558/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee Surgery and Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-023-00208-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee Surgery and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-023-00208-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Higher rates of fully preserved posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty using a double tibial cut: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Purpose: In cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty, posterior cruciate ligament damage may occur during tibial cutting. A prospective randomized study was conducted to investigate whether a novel tibial cutting technique was more effective than the currently used techniques.
Materials and methods: Patients undergoing cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty were recruited in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. In 25 patients (group 1) the tibial cut was performed using a double tibial cut technique; in 25 (group 2) and 25 (group 3) patients, the bone island and en bloc resection techniques were performed, respectively. Posterior cruciate ligament integrity and femoral rollback were assessed at the end of surgery. The Oxford Knee Score, WOMAC score and range of motion were assessed postoperatively.
Results: Posterior cruciate ligament was completely preserved in 92% of patients in group 1 and in 64% in group 2 and 3, respectively (p = 0.03). The Oxford Knee Score and WOMAC scores did not differ between groups (p = 0.4). The mean knee flexion was 126.4°, 121.5° and 123.9° in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p = 0.04). The femoral rollback at 120° flexion was 80.7%, 72.2% and 75.4% in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p = 0.01).
Conclusions: The double cut technique preserves the posterior cruciate ligament at significantly higher rates than the bone island or en bloc resection techniques. Better posterior cruciate ligament preservation may improve the femoral rollback and knee flexion.
Level of evidence: Prospective randomized controlled trial, Level I.