重新认识超越伤害的患者安全:混合方法定性调查的启示》(Reconceptualizing Patient Safety Beyond Harm: Insights From a Mixed-Methods Qualitative Inquiry)。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Journal of nursing care quality Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-10 DOI:10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000757
Lianne Jeffs, Kerry Kuluski, Virginia Flintoft, Anne MacLaurin, Maaike Asselbergs, Rui Lin Zeng, Frances Bruno, Noah Schonewille, G Ross Baker
{"title":"重新认识超越伤害的患者安全:混合方法定性调查的启示》(Reconceptualizing Patient Safety Beyond Harm: Insights From a Mixed-Methods Qualitative Inquiry)。","authors":"Lianne Jeffs, Kerry Kuluski, Virginia Flintoft, Anne MacLaurin, Maaike Asselbergs, Rui Lin Zeng, Frances Bruno, Noah Schonewille, G Ross Baker","doi":"10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although patients' and care partners' perspectives on patient safety can guide health care learning and improvements, this information remains underutilized. Efforts to leverage this valuable data require challenging the narrow focus of safety as the absence of harm.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to gain a broader insight into how patients and care partners perceive and experience safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a mixed-methods approach that included a literature review and interviews and focus groups with patients, care partners, and health care providers. An emergent coding schema was developed from triangulation of the 2 data sets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two core themes-feeling unsafe and feeling safe-emerged that collectively represent a broader view of safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Knowledge from patients and care partners about feeling unsafe and safe needs to inform efforts to mitigate harm and promote safety, well-being, and positive outcomes and experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":16931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing care quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconceptualizing Patient Safety Beyond Harm: Insights From a Mixed-Methods Qualitative Inquiry.\",\"authors\":\"Lianne Jeffs, Kerry Kuluski, Virginia Flintoft, Anne MacLaurin, Maaike Asselbergs, Rui Lin Zeng, Frances Bruno, Noah Schonewille, G Ross Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although patients' and care partners' perspectives on patient safety can guide health care learning and improvements, this information remains underutilized. Efforts to leverage this valuable data require challenging the narrow focus of safety as the absence of harm.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to gain a broader insight into how patients and care partners perceive and experience safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a mixed-methods approach that included a literature review and interviews and focus groups with patients, care partners, and health care providers. An emergent coding schema was developed from triangulation of the 2 data sets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two core themes-feeling unsafe and feeling safe-emerged that collectively represent a broader view of safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Knowledge from patients and care partners about feeling unsafe and safe needs to inform efforts to mitigate harm and promote safety, well-being, and positive outcomes and experiences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nursing care quality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nursing care quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000757\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing care quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000757","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管患者和护理伙伴对患者安全的看法可以指导医疗护理的学习和改进,但这些信息仍未得到充分利用。目的:本研究旨在更广泛地了解患者和护理伙伴对安全的看法和体验:我们采用了一种混合方法,包括文献综述以及与患者、护理伙伴和医疗服务提供者的访谈和焦点小组。通过对两组数据进行三角测量,制定了一个新兴编码模式:结果:出现了两个核心主题--感觉不安全和感觉安全,它们共同代表了一种更广泛的安全观:患者和护理伙伴关于不安全感和安全感的知识需要为减轻伤害和促进安全、福祉以及积极的结果和体验提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reconceptualizing Patient Safety Beyond Harm: Insights From a Mixed-Methods Qualitative Inquiry.

Background: Although patients' and care partners' perspectives on patient safety can guide health care learning and improvements, this information remains underutilized. Efforts to leverage this valuable data require challenging the narrow focus of safety as the absence of harm.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to gain a broader insight into how patients and care partners perceive and experience safety.

Methods: We used a mixed-methods approach that included a literature review and interviews and focus groups with patients, care partners, and health care providers. An emergent coding schema was developed from triangulation of the 2 data sets.

Results: Two core themes-feeling unsafe and feeling safe-emerged that collectively represent a broader view of safety.

Conclusion: Knowledge from patients and care partners about feeling unsafe and safe needs to inform efforts to mitigate harm and promote safety, well-being, and positive outcomes and experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nursing Care Quality (JNCQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides practicing nurses as well as nurses who have leadership roles in nursing care quality programs with useful information regarding the application of quality principles and concepts in the practice setting. The journal offers a forum for the scholarly discussion of “real world” implementation of quality activities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信