在 11 名膝骨关节炎患者中进行关节内注射脂肪间充质干细胞 GXCPC1 的安全性和耐受性:无对照臂的非随机试验研究。

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q3 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Cheng-Fong Chen, Yi-Chung Chen, Yu-Show Fu, Shang-Wen Tsai, Po-Kuei Wu, Chao-Ming Chen, Wei-Ming Chen, Hung-Ta Hondar Wu, Chia-Hsin Lee, Chao-Liang Chang, Po-Cheng Lin, Yong-Cheng Kao, Chun-Hung Chen, Ming-Hsi Chuang
{"title":"在 11 名膝骨关节炎患者中进行关节内注射脂肪间充质干细胞 GXCPC1 的安全性和耐受性:无对照臂的非随机试验研究。","authors":"Cheng-Fong Chen, Yi-Chung Chen, Yu-Show Fu, Shang-Wen Tsai, Po-Kuei Wu, Chao-Ming Chen, Wei-Ming Chen, Hung-Ta Hondar Wu, Chia-Hsin Lee, Chao-Liang Chang, Po-Cheng Lin, Yong-Cheng Kao, Chun-Hung Chen, Ming-Hsi Chuang","doi":"10.1177/09636897231221882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study aimed to determine the safety profile of intra-articular-injected allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) GXCPC1 in subjects with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and its preliminary efficacy outcome. The 3 + 3 phase I study was designed with two dose-escalation cohorts: low dose (6.7 × 10<sup>6</sup> GXCPC1, <i>N</i> = 5) and high dose (4 × 10<sup>7</sup> GXCPC1, <i>N</i> = 6). The primary endpoint was safety, which was evaluated by recording adverse events throughout the trial; the secondary endpoints included total, pain, stiffness, and function subscales of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, and 12-Item Short Form (SF-12) health survey questionnaire. The GXCPC1 treatment was found to be safe after 1 year of follow-up with no treatment-related severe adverse events observed. When compared to baseline, subjects in both the low- and high-dose cohorts demonstrated improving trends in pain and knee function after receiving GXCPC1 treatment. Generally, the net change in pain (95% confidence interval (CI) = -7.773 to -2.561t at 12 weeks compared to baseline) and knee function (95% CI = -24.297 to -10.036t at 12 weeks compared to baseline) was better in subjects receiving high-dose GXCPC1. Although this study included a limited number of subjects without a placebo arm, it showed that the intra-articular injection of ADSCs was safe and well-tolerated in subjects with therapeutic alternatives to treat knee OA. However, a larger scale study with an appropriate control would be necessary for clinical efficacy in the following study.</p>","PeriodicalId":9721,"journal":{"name":"Cell Transplantation","volume":"33 ","pages":"9636897231221882"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10785714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Tolerability of Intra-Articular Injection of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells GXCPC1 in 11 Subjects With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Nonrandomized Pilot Study Without a Control Arm.\",\"authors\":\"Cheng-Fong Chen, Yi-Chung Chen, Yu-Show Fu, Shang-Wen Tsai, Po-Kuei Wu, Chao-Ming Chen, Wei-Ming Chen, Hung-Ta Hondar Wu, Chia-Hsin Lee, Chao-Liang Chang, Po-Cheng Lin, Yong-Cheng Kao, Chun-Hung Chen, Ming-Hsi Chuang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09636897231221882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The current study aimed to determine the safety profile of intra-articular-injected allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) GXCPC1 in subjects with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and its preliminary efficacy outcome. The 3 + 3 phase I study was designed with two dose-escalation cohorts: low dose (6.7 × 10<sup>6</sup> GXCPC1, <i>N</i> = 5) and high dose (4 × 10<sup>7</sup> GXCPC1, <i>N</i> = 6). The primary endpoint was safety, which was evaluated by recording adverse events throughout the trial; the secondary endpoints included total, pain, stiffness, and function subscales of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, and 12-Item Short Form (SF-12) health survey questionnaire. The GXCPC1 treatment was found to be safe after 1 year of follow-up with no treatment-related severe adverse events observed. When compared to baseline, subjects in both the low- and high-dose cohorts demonstrated improving trends in pain and knee function after receiving GXCPC1 treatment. Generally, the net change in pain (95% confidence interval (CI) = -7.773 to -2.561t at 12 weeks compared to baseline) and knee function (95% CI = -24.297 to -10.036t at 12 weeks compared to baseline) was better in subjects receiving high-dose GXCPC1. Although this study included a limited number of subjects without a placebo arm, it showed that the intra-articular injection of ADSCs was safe and well-tolerated in subjects with therapeutic alternatives to treat knee OA. However, a larger scale study with an appropriate control would be necessary for clinical efficacy in the following study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cell Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"9636897231221882\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10785714/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cell Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09636897231221882\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09636897231221882","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者关节内注射异体脂肪间充质干细胞(ADSCs)GXCPC1的安全性及其初步疗效。3 + 3 I期研究设计了两个剂量递增组:低剂量(6.7 × 106 GXCPC1,N = 5)和高剂量(4 × 107 GXCPC1,N = 6)。主要终点是安全性,通过记录整个试验过程中的不良事件进行评估;次要终点包括西安大略和麦克马斯特大学关节炎指数(WOMAC)的总分、疼痛、僵硬和功能分量表、疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)和12项简表(SF-12)健康调查问卷。经过一年的随访发现,GXCPC1治疗是安全的,没有发现与治疗相关的严重不良反应。与基线相比,低剂量和高剂量组的受试者在接受 GXCPC1 治疗后,疼痛和膝关节功能均呈改善趋势。一般来说,接受高剂量 GXCPC1 治疗的受试者在疼痛(95% 置信区间 (CI) = -7.773 至 -2.561t,12 周后与基线相比)和膝关节功能(95% 置信区间 (CI) = -24.297 至 -10.036t,12 周后与基线相比)方面的净变化较好。虽然这项研究的受试者人数有限,而且没有安慰剂组,但它表明,在采用替代疗法治疗膝关节 OA 的受试者中,关节内注射 ADSCs 是安全的,而且耐受性良好。不过,在接下来的研究中,有必要进行更大规模的研究,并进行适当的对照,以确定临床疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and Tolerability of Intra-Articular Injection of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells GXCPC1 in 11 Subjects With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Nonrandomized Pilot Study Without a Control Arm.

The current study aimed to determine the safety profile of intra-articular-injected allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) GXCPC1 in subjects with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and its preliminary efficacy outcome. The 3 + 3 phase I study was designed with two dose-escalation cohorts: low dose (6.7 × 106 GXCPC1, N = 5) and high dose (4 × 107 GXCPC1, N = 6). The primary endpoint was safety, which was evaluated by recording adverse events throughout the trial; the secondary endpoints included total, pain, stiffness, and function subscales of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, and 12-Item Short Form (SF-12) health survey questionnaire. The GXCPC1 treatment was found to be safe after 1 year of follow-up with no treatment-related severe adverse events observed. When compared to baseline, subjects in both the low- and high-dose cohorts demonstrated improving trends in pain and knee function after receiving GXCPC1 treatment. Generally, the net change in pain (95% confidence interval (CI) = -7.773 to -2.561t at 12 weeks compared to baseline) and knee function (95% CI = -24.297 to -10.036t at 12 weeks compared to baseline) was better in subjects receiving high-dose GXCPC1. Although this study included a limited number of subjects without a placebo arm, it showed that the intra-articular injection of ADSCs was safe and well-tolerated in subjects with therapeutic alternatives to treat knee OA. However, a larger scale study with an appropriate control would be necessary for clinical efficacy in the following study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cell Transplantation
Cell Transplantation 生物-细胞与组织工程
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Cell Transplantation, The Regenerative Medicine Journal is an open access, peer reviewed journal that is published 12 times annually. Cell Transplantation is a multi-disciplinary forum for publication of articles on cell transplantation and its applications to human diseases. Articles focus on a myriad of topics including the physiological, medical, pre-clinical, tissue engineering, stem cell, and device-oriented aspects of the nervous, endocrine, cardiovascular, and endothelial systems, as well as genetically engineered cells. Cell Transplantation also reports on relevant technological advances, clinical studies, and regulatory considerations related to the implantation of cells into the body in order to provide complete coverage of the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信