{"title":"关于 \"巴黎和沃孔蒂盆地(法国)阿尔卑斯矿床粘土矿物学的环境和气候控制\"[Cretaceous Res. 108 (2020) 104342]和 \"沃孔蒂盆地Col de Pré-Guittard剖面(Aptian-Albian)OAE1b的天文校准\"[Cretaceous Res. 150 (2023) 105618]的评论","authors":"Jean Gabriel Bréhéret , Jean-François Deconinck","doi":"10.1016/j.cretres.2023.105826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We wish to point out an obvious error made by one of us (J.F. Deconinck), and kindly reported by J.G. Bréhéret, the reason why we have jointly decided to publish this correction. The error affects at varying degrees the scientific quality and partly invalidates the conclusions of the following articles: Corentin et al. (2020) « <span><em>Environmental and climatic controls of the clay </em><em>mineralogy</em><span><em> of </em><em>Albian</em><em> deposits in the Paris and Vocontian basins (France)</em></span></span> » (Cretaceous Research, 108). and Ait-Itto et al. (2023) « <span><em>Astronomical calibration of the OAE1b from the </em><em>Col</em><em> de Pré-Guittard section (Aptian–Albian) Vocontian Basin</em></span> » (Cretaceous Research, 150).</p><p>Indeed, for the Vocontian basin, the analytical work, whatever its quality, was carried out on a stratigraphic interval which does not correspond to the presentation made. The two articles in question did not take into account the detailed lithostratigraphy<span> and biostratigraphy earlier published, notably by Bréhéret (1997) and Bréhéret & Brumsack (2000) mentioning known marker beds as presented in these works. Thus, for one of the two sections, the displayed time window assumed to be the lower Albian, actually corresponds to a small part of the middle Albian and a part of the upper Albian. This invalidates many of the proposed results and conclusions.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":55207,"journal":{"name":"Cretaceous Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comments on « Environmental and climatic controls of the clay mineralogy of Albian deposits in the Paris and Vocontian basins (France) » [Cretaceous Res. 108 (2020) 104342] and « Astronomical calibration of the OAE1b from the Col de Pré-Guittard section (Aptian-Albian) Vocontian Basin » [Cretaceous Res. 150 (2023) 105618]\",\"authors\":\"Jean Gabriel Bréhéret , Jean-François Deconinck\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cretres.2023.105826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We wish to point out an obvious error made by one of us (J.F. Deconinck), and kindly reported by J.G. Bréhéret, the reason why we have jointly decided to publish this correction. The error affects at varying degrees the scientific quality and partly invalidates the conclusions of the following articles: Corentin et al. (2020) « <span><em>Environmental and climatic controls of the clay </em><em>mineralogy</em><span><em> of </em><em>Albian</em><em> deposits in the Paris and Vocontian basins (France)</em></span></span> » (Cretaceous Research, 108). and Ait-Itto et al. (2023) « <span><em>Astronomical calibration of the OAE1b from the </em><em>Col</em><em> de Pré-Guittard section (Aptian–Albian) Vocontian Basin</em></span> » (Cretaceous Research, 150).</p><p>Indeed, for the Vocontian basin, the analytical work, whatever its quality, was carried out on a stratigraphic interval which does not correspond to the presentation made. The two articles in question did not take into account the detailed lithostratigraphy<span> and biostratigraphy earlier published, notably by Bréhéret (1997) and Bréhéret & Brumsack (2000) mentioning known marker beds as presented in these works. Thus, for one of the two sections, the displayed time window assumed to be the lower Albian, actually corresponds to a small part of the middle Albian and a part of the upper Albian. This invalidates many of the proposed results and conclusions.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cretaceous Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cretaceous Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195667123003543\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cretaceous Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195667123003543","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comments on « Environmental and climatic controls of the clay mineralogy of Albian deposits in the Paris and Vocontian basins (France) » [Cretaceous Res. 108 (2020) 104342] and « Astronomical calibration of the OAE1b from the Col de Pré-Guittard section (Aptian-Albian) Vocontian Basin » [Cretaceous Res. 150 (2023) 105618]
We wish to point out an obvious error made by one of us (J.F. Deconinck), and kindly reported by J.G. Bréhéret, the reason why we have jointly decided to publish this correction. The error affects at varying degrees the scientific quality and partly invalidates the conclusions of the following articles: Corentin et al. (2020) « Environmental and climatic controls of the clay mineralogy of Albian deposits in the Paris and Vocontian basins (France) » (Cretaceous Research, 108). and Ait-Itto et al. (2023) « Astronomical calibration of the OAE1b from the Col de Pré-Guittard section (Aptian–Albian) Vocontian Basin » (Cretaceous Research, 150).
Indeed, for the Vocontian basin, the analytical work, whatever its quality, was carried out on a stratigraphic interval which does not correspond to the presentation made. The two articles in question did not take into account the detailed lithostratigraphy and biostratigraphy earlier published, notably by Bréhéret (1997) and Bréhéret & Brumsack (2000) mentioning known marker beds as presented in these works. Thus, for one of the two sections, the displayed time window assumed to be the lower Albian, actually corresponds to a small part of the middle Albian and a part of the upper Albian. This invalidates many of the proposed results and conclusions.
期刊介绍:
Cretaceous Research provides a forum for the rapid publication of research on all aspects of the Cretaceous Period, including its boundaries with the Jurassic and Palaeogene. Authoritative papers reporting detailed investigations of Cretaceous stratigraphy and palaeontology, studies of regional geology, and reviews of recently published books are complemented by short communications of significant new findings.
Papers submitted to Cretaceous Research should place the research in a broad context, with emphasis placed towards our better understanding of the Cretaceous, that are therefore of interest to the diverse, international readership of the journal. Full length papers that focus solely on a local theme or area will not be accepted for publication; authors of short communications are encouraged to discuss how their findings are of relevance to the Cretaceous on a broad scale.
Research Areas include:
• Regional geology
• Stratigraphy and palaeontology
• Palaeobiology
• Palaeobiogeography
• Palaeoceanography
• Palaeoclimatology
• Evolutionary Palaeoecology
• Geochronology
• Global events.