{"title":"比较虚拟实施两种认字卡片干预的效果","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s10864-023-09541-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Flashcard interventions are commonly used to increase sight-word acquisition and reading ability among students. However, most research on flashcard interventions is implemented in person and not using virtual instruction. The current study compared two flash card interventions, incremental rehearsal (IR) and strategic incremental rehearsal (SIR), on sight-word acquisition when administered via Zoom® video sharing technology. Participants included four struggling readers in first grade. An adapted alternating treatments single-case design exposed participants to the IR, SIR, and a control condition for 10 sessions with the interventionist providing all sessions via Zoom®. Findings indicated all participants learned more words with IR and SIR than in the control condition. However, SIR resulted in more gains in sight-word acquisition compared to IR for all participants. Implications for implementing individualized interventions via virtual modalities are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":"79 5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Efficacy of Virtual Implementation for Two Sight Word Flashcard Interventions\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10864-023-09541-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Flashcard interventions are commonly used to increase sight-word acquisition and reading ability among students. However, most research on flashcard interventions is implemented in person and not using virtual instruction. The current study compared two flash card interventions, incremental rehearsal (IR) and strategic incremental rehearsal (SIR), on sight-word acquisition when administered via Zoom® video sharing technology. Participants included four struggling readers in first grade. An adapted alternating treatments single-case design exposed participants to the IR, SIR, and a control condition for 10 sessions with the interventionist providing all sessions via Zoom®. Findings indicated all participants learned more words with IR and SIR than in the control condition. However, SIR resulted in more gains in sight-word acquisition compared to IR for all participants. Implications for implementing individualized interventions via virtual modalities are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral Education\",\"volume\":\"79 5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-023-09541-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-023-09541-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要 闪存卡干预通常用于提高学生的视字能力和阅读能力。然而,有关闪卡干预的大多数研究都是在课堂上实施的,而不是使用虚拟教学。本研究比较了通过 Zoom® 视频共享技术实施的两种闪卡干预--增量排练(IR)和策略性增量排练(SIR)--对视词习得的影响。参与者包括四名一年级的阅读困难生。干预者通过 Zoom® 提供所有课程,采用改编的交替处理单例设计,让参与者接受 IR、SIR 和对照条件的 10 次训练。研究结果表明,与对照组相比,所有参加者在 IR 和 SIR 中都学到了更多的单词。然而,与 IR 相比,SIR 使所有参与者在视力单词学习方面取得了更大的进步。本文讨论了通过虚拟模式实施个性化干预的意义。
Comparing the Efficacy of Virtual Implementation for Two Sight Word Flashcard Interventions
Abstract
Flashcard interventions are commonly used to increase sight-word acquisition and reading ability among students. However, most research on flashcard interventions is implemented in person and not using virtual instruction. The current study compared two flash card interventions, incremental rehearsal (IR) and strategic incremental rehearsal (SIR), on sight-word acquisition when administered via Zoom® video sharing technology. Participants included four struggling readers in first grade. An adapted alternating treatments single-case design exposed participants to the IR, SIR, and a control condition for 10 sessions with the interventionist providing all sessions via Zoom®. Findings indicated all participants learned more words with IR and SIR than in the control condition. However, SIR resulted in more gains in sight-word acquisition compared to IR for all participants. Implications for implementing individualized interventions via virtual modalities are discussed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Behavioral Education is an international forum dedicated to publishing original research papers on the application of behavioral principles and technology to education. Education is defined broadly and the journal places no restriction on the types of participants involved in the reported studies--including by age, ability, or setting. Each quarterly issue presents empirical research investigating best-practices and innovative methods to address a wide range of educational targets and issues pertaining to the needs of diverse learners and to implementation. The Journal of Behavioral Education is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal whose target audience is educational researchers and practitioners including general and special education teachers, school psychologists, and other school personnel. Rigorous experimental designs, including single-subject with replication and group designs are considered for publication. An emphasis is placed on direct observation measures of the primary dependent variable in studies of educational issues, problems, and practices. Discussion articles and critical reviews also are published.