耳鸣的单一治疗与综合治疗:随机多中心试验

Stefan Schoisswohl, Laura Basso, Jorge Simoes, Milena Engelke, Berthold Langguth, Birgit Mazurek, Jose Antonio Lopez-Escamez, Dimitrios Kikidis, Rilana Cima, Alberto Bernal-Robledano, Benjamin Boecking, Jan Bulla, Christopher Cederroth, Sam Denys, Alba Escalera-Balsera, Alvaro Gallego-Martinez, Silvano Gallus, Leire Hidalgo-Lopez, Carlotta Jarach, Hafez Kader, Michael Koller, Alessandra Lugo, Steven Marcrum, Nikos Markatos, Juan Martin-Lagos, Marta Martinez-Martinez, Nicolas Muller-Locatelli, Patrick Neff, Uli Niemann, Patricia Perez-Carpena, Ruediger Pryss, Clara Puga, Paula Robles-Bolivar, Matthias Rose, Martin Schecklmann, Tabea Schiele, Miro Schleicher, Johannes Schobel, Myra Spiliopoulou, Sabine Stark, Susanne Staudinger, Alexandra Stege, Beat Toedtli, Ilias Trochidis, Vishnu Unnikrishnan, Evgenia Vassou, Nicolas Verhaert, Carsten Vogel, Zoi Zachou, Winfried Schlee
{"title":"耳鸣的单一治疗与综合治疗:随机多中心试验","authors":"Stefan Schoisswohl, Laura Basso, Jorge Simoes, Milena Engelke, Berthold Langguth, Birgit Mazurek, Jose Antonio Lopez-Escamez, Dimitrios Kikidis, Rilana Cima, Alberto Bernal-Robledano, Benjamin Boecking, Jan Bulla, Christopher Cederroth, Sam Denys, Alba Escalera-Balsera, Alvaro Gallego-Martinez, Silvano Gallus, Leire Hidalgo-Lopez, Carlotta Jarach, Hafez Kader, Michael Koller, Alessandra Lugo, Steven Marcrum, Nikos Markatos, Juan Martin-Lagos, Marta Martinez-Martinez, Nicolas Muller-Locatelli, Patrick Neff, Uli Niemann, Patricia Perez-Carpena, Ruediger Pryss, Clara Puga, Paula Robles-Bolivar, Matthias Rose, Martin Schecklmann, Tabea Schiele, Miro Schleicher, Johannes Schobel, Myra Spiliopoulou, Sabine Stark, Susanne Staudinger, Alexandra Stege, Beat Toedtli, Ilias Trochidis, Vishnu Unnikrishnan, Evgenia Vassou, Nicolas Verhaert, Carsten Vogel, Zoi Zachou, Winfried Schlee","doi":"10.1101/2024.01.09.24300978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:\nTinnitus is associated with a variety of etiologies, phenotypes, and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, and available treatments have limited efficacy. A combination of treatments, addressing various aspects of tinnitus, might provide a viable and superior treatment strategy.\nMethods:\nIn this multicenter, parallel-arm, randomized controlled clinical trial, patients with chronic subjective tinnitus were randomly assigned to single or combination treatment of 12 weeks each. Cognitive-behavioral therapy, hearing aids, structured counseling and sound therapy were administered either alone or as a combination of two treatments resulting in 10 treatment arms. The primary endpoint was the difference in the change from baseline to week 12 in the total score of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory between single and combination treatments.\nResults:\nOut of 461 enrolled patients 230 were assigned to single and 231 to combination treatment. Least-squares mean changes from baseline to week 12 were -11.7 for single (95% confidence interval [CI], -14.4 to -9.0) and -14.9 for combination treatments (95% CI, -17.7 to -12.1), with a significant between-group difference (p=0.034). Sound therapy alone had the lowest effect size. In contrast, cognitive-behavioral therapy and hearing aids alone had large effect sizes, which could not be further increased by combination treatment.\nConclusions:\nIn this trial involving patients with chronic tinnitus, all treatment arms showed improvement in THI scores from baseline to week 12. No clear synergistic effect was observed when combining treatments, but rather a compensatory effect, where a more effective treatment offsets the clinical effects of a less effective treatment.","PeriodicalId":501185,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Otolaryngology","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single versus Combination Treatment in Tinnitus: A Randomized, Multicenter Trial\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Schoisswohl, Laura Basso, Jorge Simoes, Milena Engelke, Berthold Langguth, Birgit Mazurek, Jose Antonio Lopez-Escamez, Dimitrios Kikidis, Rilana Cima, Alberto Bernal-Robledano, Benjamin Boecking, Jan Bulla, Christopher Cederroth, Sam Denys, Alba Escalera-Balsera, Alvaro Gallego-Martinez, Silvano Gallus, Leire Hidalgo-Lopez, Carlotta Jarach, Hafez Kader, Michael Koller, Alessandra Lugo, Steven Marcrum, Nikos Markatos, Juan Martin-Lagos, Marta Martinez-Martinez, Nicolas Muller-Locatelli, Patrick Neff, Uli Niemann, Patricia Perez-Carpena, Ruediger Pryss, Clara Puga, Paula Robles-Bolivar, Matthias Rose, Martin Schecklmann, Tabea Schiele, Miro Schleicher, Johannes Schobel, Myra Spiliopoulou, Sabine Stark, Susanne Staudinger, Alexandra Stege, Beat Toedtli, Ilias Trochidis, Vishnu Unnikrishnan, Evgenia Vassou, Nicolas Verhaert, Carsten Vogel, Zoi Zachou, Winfried Schlee\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.01.09.24300978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:\\nTinnitus is associated with a variety of etiologies, phenotypes, and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, and available treatments have limited efficacy. A combination of treatments, addressing various aspects of tinnitus, might provide a viable and superior treatment strategy.\\nMethods:\\nIn this multicenter, parallel-arm, randomized controlled clinical trial, patients with chronic subjective tinnitus were randomly assigned to single or combination treatment of 12 weeks each. Cognitive-behavioral therapy, hearing aids, structured counseling and sound therapy were administered either alone or as a combination of two treatments resulting in 10 treatment arms. The primary endpoint was the difference in the change from baseline to week 12 in the total score of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory between single and combination treatments.\\nResults:\\nOut of 461 enrolled patients 230 were assigned to single and 231 to combination treatment. Least-squares mean changes from baseline to week 12 were -11.7 for single (95% confidence interval [CI], -14.4 to -9.0) and -14.9 for combination treatments (95% CI, -17.7 to -12.1), with a significant between-group difference (p=0.034). Sound therapy alone had the lowest effect size. In contrast, cognitive-behavioral therapy and hearing aids alone had large effect sizes, which could not be further increased by combination treatment.\\nConclusions:\\nIn this trial involving patients with chronic tinnitus, all treatment arms showed improvement in THI scores from baseline to week 12. No clear synergistic effect was observed when combining treatments, but rather a compensatory effect, where a more effective treatment offsets the clinical effects of a less effective treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.09.24300978\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.09.24300978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:耳鸣与多种病因、表型和潜在的病理生理机制有关,现有的治疗方法疗效有限。方法:在这项多中心、平行臂、随机对照临床试验中,慢性主观性耳鸣患者被随机分配接受单一或综合治疗,每种治疗为期 12 周。认知行为疗法、助听器、结构化咨询和声音疗法可单独使用,也可两种疗法联合使用,共分为 10 个治疗组。主要终点是耳鸣障碍量表总分从基线到第12周的变化在单一疗法和综合疗法之间的差异。从基线到第12周,单一疗法的最小二乘法平均变化为-11.7(95%置信区间[CI],-14.4至-9.0),联合疗法的最小二乘法平均变化为-14.9(95%置信区间[CI],-17.7至-12.1),组间差异显著(P=0.034)。单用声音疗法的疗效最低。结论:在这项涉及慢性耳鸣患者的试验中,所有治疗组从基线到第12周的THI评分均有所改善。在联合治疗时没有观察到明显的协同效应,而是出现了补偿效应,即一种更有效的治疗方法抵消了一种效果较差的治疗方法的临床效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single versus Combination Treatment in Tinnitus: A Randomized, Multicenter Trial
Background: Tinnitus is associated with a variety of etiologies, phenotypes, and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, and available treatments have limited efficacy. A combination of treatments, addressing various aspects of tinnitus, might provide a viable and superior treatment strategy. Methods: In this multicenter, parallel-arm, randomized controlled clinical trial, patients with chronic subjective tinnitus were randomly assigned to single or combination treatment of 12 weeks each. Cognitive-behavioral therapy, hearing aids, structured counseling and sound therapy were administered either alone or as a combination of two treatments resulting in 10 treatment arms. The primary endpoint was the difference in the change from baseline to week 12 in the total score of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory between single and combination treatments. Results: Out of 461 enrolled patients 230 were assigned to single and 231 to combination treatment. Least-squares mean changes from baseline to week 12 were -11.7 for single (95% confidence interval [CI], -14.4 to -9.0) and -14.9 for combination treatments (95% CI, -17.7 to -12.1), with a significant between-group difference (p=0.034). Sound therapy alone had the lowest effect size. In contrast, cognitive-behavioral therapy and hearing aids alone had large effect sizes, which could not be further increased by combination treatment. Conclusions: In this trial involving patients with chronic tinnitus, all treatment arms showed improvement in THI scores from baseline to week 12. No clear synergistic effect was observed when combining treatments, but rather a compensatory effect, where a more effective treatment offsets the clinical effects of a less effective treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信