Walter B. Wilson , Aaron A. Urbas , Maryam Abdur-Rahman , Arianna Romares , Ewelina Mistek-Morabito
{"title":"利用液相色谱法和光电二极管阵列检测法测定 53 种可吸入大麻植物产品中的Δ9-四氢大麻酚、四氢大麻酚、Δ8-四氢大麻酚和Δ9-四氢大麻酚总量","authors":"Walter B. Wilson , Aaron A. Urbas , Maryam Abdur-Rahman , Arianna Romares , Ewelina Mistek-Morabito","doi":"10.1016/j.forc.2024.100550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The passage of the 2018 Farm Bill defined hemp as cannabis plant containing 0.3 % or less of Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC, which led to a large increase in hemp production in the United States in 2021. Approximately 76 % of it focused on floral hemp that is used to produce hemp-derived finished products such as smokable hemp (<em>e.g.</em>, manicured, roll your own, or cigarettes). As a result, forensic laboratories have seen a significant increase in confiscated cannabis samples, but few reliable analytical methods exist for differentiation between hemp and marijuana. In response to the need for reliable quantitative methods, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has developed and evaluated analytical methods to provide forensic scientists the tools necessary. In this manuscript, 53 smokable hemp plant products were analyzed for Δ<sup>8</sup>-THC, Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC, THCA, and total Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC by a previously established liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection (LC-PDA) method using a methanol extraction procedure. Over 90 % of the samples analyzed by NIST were determined to have a total Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC mass fraction above 0.3 % even though samples were being marketed as hemp. Surprisingly, often the associated online documentation reported total Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC mass fractions of ≥ 0.3 %. Mass fractions determined by NIST were compared with manufacturer’s online documentation for 22 samples. Measurements differed by ≈ 55 % for total Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC, ≈ 68 % for THCA, and ≈ 18 % for Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC. Poor agreement may result from method difference, sample inhomogeneity, batch to batch variability, changes due to storage conditions, and/or product labels or online documentation that are not representative of actual products.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":324,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Chemistry","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100550"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246817092400002X/pdfft?md5=c81c69350faf136b9ffa629ac631f0d9&pid=1-s2.0-S246817092400002X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of Δ9-THC, THCA, Δ8-THC, and total Δ9-THC in 53 smokable hemp plant products by liquid chromatography and photodiode array detection\",\"authors\":\"Walter B. Wilson , Aaron A. Urbas , Maryam Abdur-Rahman , Arianna Romares , Ewelina Mistek-Morabito\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forc.2024.100550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The passage of the 2018 Farm Bill defined hemp as cannabis plant containing 0.3 % or less of Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC, which led to a large increase in hemp production in the United States in 2021. Approximately 76 % of it focused on floral hemp that is used to produce hemp-derived finished products such as smokable hemp (<em>e.g.</em>, manicured, roll your own, or cigarettes). As a result, forensic laboratories have seen a significant increase in confiscated cannabis samples, but few reliable analytical methods exist for differentiation between hemp and marijuana. In response to the need for reliable quantitative methods, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has developed and evaluated analytical methods to provide forensic scientists the tools necessary. In this manuscript, 53 smokable hemp plant products were analyzed for Δ<sup>8</sup>-THC, Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC, THCA, and total Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC by a previously established liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection (LC-PDA) method using a methanol extraction procedure. Over 90 % of the samples analyzed by NIST were determined to have a total Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC mass fraction above 0.3 % even though samples were being marketed as hemp. Surprisingly, often the associated online documentation reported total Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC mass fractions of ≥ 0.3 %. Mass fractions determined by NIST were compared with manufacturer’s online documentation for 22 samples. Measurements differed by ≈ 55 % for total Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC, ≈ 68 % for THCA, and ≈ 18 % for Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC. Poor agreement may result from method difference, sample inhomogeneity, batch to batch variability, changes due to storage conditions, and/or product labels or online documentation that are not representative of actual products.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100550\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246817092400002X/pdfft?md5=c81c69350faf136b9ffa629ac631f0d9&pid=1-s2.0-S246817092400002X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246817092400002X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246817092400002X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Determination of Δ9-THC, THCA, Δ8-THC, and total Δ9-THC in 53 smokable hemp plant products by liquid chromatography and photodiode array detection
The passage of the 2018 Farm Bill defined hemp as cannabis plant containing 0.3 % or less of Δ9-THC, which led to a large increase in hemp production in the United States in 2021. Approximately 76 % of it focused on floral hemp that is used to produce hemp-derived finished products such as smokable hemp (e.g., manicured, roll your own, or cigarettes). As a result, forensic laboratories have seen a significant increase in confiscated cannabis samples, but few reliable analytical methods exist for differentiation between hemp and marijuana. In response to the need for reliable quantitative methods, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has developed and evaluated analytical methods to provide forensic scientists the tools necessary. In this manuscript, 53 smokable hemp plant products were analyzed for Δ8-THC, Δ9-THC, THCA, and total Δ9-THC by a previously established liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection (LC-PDA) method using a methanol extraction procedure. Over 90 % of the samples analyzed by NIST were determined to have a total Δ9-THC mass fraction above 0.3 % even though samples were being marketed as hemp. Surprisingly, often the associated online documentation reported total Δ9-THC mass fractions of ≥ 0.3 %. Mass fractions determined by NIST were compared with manufacturer’s online documentation for 22 samples. Measurements differed by ≈ 55 % for total Δ9-THC, ≈ 68 % for THCA, and ≈ 18 % for Δ9-THC. Poor agreement may result from method difference, sample inhomogeneity, batch to batch variability, changes due to storage conditions, and/or product labels or online documentation that are not representative of actual products.
期刊介绍:
Forensic Chemistry publishes high quality manuscripts focusing on the theory, research and application of any chemical science to forensic analysis. The scope of the journal includes fundamental advancements that result in a better understanding of the evidentiary significance derived from the physical and chemical analysis of materials. The scope of Forensic Chemistry will also include the application and or development of any molecular and atomic spectrochemical technique, electrochemical techniques, sensors, surface characterization techniques, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, chemometrics and statistics, and separation sciences (e.g. chromatography) that provide insight into the forensic analysis of materials. Evidential topics of interest to the journal include, but are not limited to, fingerprint analysis, drug analysis, ignitable liquid residue analysis, explosives detection and analysis, the characterization and comparison of trace evidence (glass, fibers, paints and polymers, tapes, soils and other materials), ink and paper analysis, gunshot residue analysis, synthetic pathways for drugs, toxicology and the analysis and chemistry associated with the components of fingermarks. The journal is particularly interested in receiving manuscripts that report advances in the forensic interpretation of chemical evidence. Technology Readiness Level: When submitting an article to Forensic Chemistry, all authors will be asked to self-assign a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) to their article. The purpose of the TRL system is to help readers understand the level of maturity of an idea or method, to help track the evolution of readiness of a given technique or method, and to help filter published articles by the expected ease of implementation in an operation setting within a crime lab.