支持家长/护理人员和青少年自我护理湿疹的两种在线干预措施的成本效益。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
European Journal of Health Economics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1007/s10198-023-01649-9
Tracey H Sach, Mary Onoja, Holly Clarke, Miriam Santer, Ingrid Muller, Taeko Becque, Beth Stuart, Julie Hooper, Mary Steele, Sylvia Wilczynska, Matthew J Ridd, Amanda Roberts, Amina Ahmed, Lucy Yardley, Paul Little, Kate Greenwell, Katy Sivyer, Jacqui Nuttall, Gareth Griffiths, Sandra Lawton, Sinéad M Langan, Laura Howells, Paul Leighton, Hywel C Williams, Kim S Thomas
{"title":"支持家长/护理人员和青少年自我护理湿疹的两种在线干预措施的成本效益。","authors":"Tracey H Sach, Mary Onoja, Holly Clarke, Miriam Santer, Ingrid Muller, Taeko Becque, Beth Stuart, Julie Hooper, Mary Steele, Sylvia Wilczynska, Matthew J Ridd, Amanda Roberts, Amina Ahmed, Lucy Yardley, Paul Little, Kate Greenwell, Katy Sivyer, Jacqui Nuttall, Gareth Griffiths, Sandra Lawton, Sinéad M Langan, Laura Howells, Paul Leighton, Hywel C Williams, Kim S Thomas","doi":"10.1007/s10198-023-01649-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the cost-effectiveness of online behavioral interventions (EczemaCareOnline.org.uk) designed to support eczema self-care management for parents/carers and young people from an NHS perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two within-trial economic evaluations, using regression-based approaches, adjusting for baseline and pre-specified confounder variables, were undertaken alongside two independent, pragmatic, parallel group, unmasked randomized controlled trials, recruiting through primary care. Trial 1 recruited 340 parents/carers of children aged 0-12 years and Trial 2 337 young people aged 13-25 years with eczema scored ≥ 5 on Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM). Participants were randomized (1:1) to online intervention plus usual care or usual care alone. Resource use, collected via medical notes review, was valued using published unit costs in UK £Sterling 2021. Quality-of-life was elicited using proxy CHU-9D in Trial 1 and self-report EQ-5D-5L in Trial 2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention was dominant (cost saving and more effective) with a high probability of cost-effectiveness (> 68%) in most analyses. The exception was the complete case cost-utility analysis for Trial 1 (omitting participants with children aged < 2), with adjusted incremental cost savings of -£34.15 (95% CI  - 104.54 to 36.24) and incremental QALYs of - 0.003 (95% CI  - 0.021 to 0.015) producing an incremental cost per QALY of £12,466. In the secondary combined (Trials 1 and 2) cost-effectiveness analysis, the adjusted incremental cost was -£20.35 (95% CI  - 55.41 to 14.70) with incremental success (≥ 2-point change on POEM) of 10.3% (95% CI 2.3-18.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The free at point of use online eczema self-management intervention was low cost to run and cost-effective.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was registered prospectively with the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN79282252). URL www.EczemaCareOnline.org.uk .</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-effectiveness of two online interventions supporting self-care for eczema for parents/carers and young people.\",\"authors\":\"Tracey H Sach, Mary Onoja, Holly Clarke, Miriam Santer, Ingrid Muller, Taeko Becque, Beth Stuart, Julie Hooper, Mary Steele, Sylvia Wilczynska, Matthew J Ridd, Amanda Roberts, Amina Ahmed, Lucy Yardley, Paul Little, Kate Greenwell, Katy Sivyer, Jacqui Nuttall, Gareth Griffiths, Sandra Lawton, Sinéad M Langan, Laura Howells, Paul Leighton, Hywel C Williams, Kim S Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10198-023-01649-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the cost-effectiveness of online behavioral interventions (EczemaCareOnline.org.uk) designed to support eczema self-care management for parents/carers and young people from an NHS perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two within-trial economic evaluations, using regression-based approaches, adjusting for baseline and pre-specified confounder variables, were undertaken alongside two independent, pragmatic, parallel group, unmasked randomized controlled trials, recruiting through primary care. Trial 1 recruited 340 parents/carers of children aged 0-12 years and Trial 2 337 young people aged 13-25 years with eczema scored ≥ 5 on Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM). Participants were randomized (1:1) to online intervention plus usual care or usual care alone. Resource use, collected via medical notes review, was valued using published unit costs in UK £Sterling 2021. Quality-of-life was elicited using proxy CHU-9D in Trial 1 and self-report EQ-5D-5L in Trial 2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention was dominant (cost saving and more effective) with a high probability of cost-effectiveness (> 68%) in most analyses. The exception was the complete case cost-utility analysis for Trial 1 (omitting participants with children aged < 2), with adjusted incremental cost savings of -£34.15 (95% CI  - 104.54 to 36.24) and incremental QALYs of - 0.003 (95% CI  - 0.021 to 0.015) producing an incremental cost per QALY of £12,466. In the secondary combined (Trials 1 and 2) cost-effectiveness analysis, the adjusted incremental cost was -£20.35 (95% CI  - 55.41 to 14.70) with incremental success (≥ 2-point change on POEM) of 10.3% (95% CI 2.3-18.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The free at point of use online eczema self-management intervention was low cost to run and cost-effective.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was registered prospectively with the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN79282252). URL www.EczemaCareOnline.org.uk .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Health Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377600/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Health Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-023-01649-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-023-01649-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:从英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的角度评估在线行为干预(EczemaCareOnline.org.uk)的成本效益:从英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的角度评估旨在支持父母/照护者和青少年湿疹自我护理管理的在线行为干预(EczemaCareOnline.org.uk)的成本效益:在进行两项独立、务实、平行组、无掩蔽随机对照试验的同时,还进行了两项试验内经济评估,采用基于回归的方法,对基线和预先指定的混杂变量进行调整,并通过初级保健进行招募。试验1招募了340名0-12岁儿童的家长/监护人,试验2招募了337名13-25岁的年轻人,这些年轻人的湿疹在 "以患者为导向的湿疹测量"(POEM)中得分≥5分。参与者被随机分配(1:1)接受在线干预加常规护理或仅接受常规护理。通过病历审查收集的资源使用情况采用已公布的单位成本进行估价,单位为 2021 英镑。在试验 1 中,使用代用 CHU-9D 对生活质量进行评估;在试验 2 中,使用自我报告 EQ-5D-5L 对生活质量进行评估:在大多数分析中,干预占主导地位(节约成本且更有效),成本效益概率高(> 68%)。但试验 1 的全病例成本效用分析是个例外(省略了有年幼子女的参与者):免费在线湿疹自我管理干预的运行成本低且具有成本效益:该试验已在ISRCTN登记处进行了前瞻性登记(ISRCTN79282252)。网址:www.EczemaCareOnline.org.uk 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost-effectiveness of two online interventions supporting self-care for eczema for parents/carers and young people.

Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of online behavioral interventions (EczemaCareOnline.org.uk) designed to support eczema self-care management for parents/carers and young people from an NHS perspective.

Methods: Two within-trial economic evaluations, using regression-based approaches, adjusting for baseline and pre-specified confounder variables, were undertaken alongside two independent, pragmatic, parallel group, unmasked randomized controlled trials, recruiting through primary care. Trial 1 recruited 340 parents/carers of children aged 0-12 years and Trial 2 337 young people aged 13-25 years with eczema scored ≥ 5 on Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM). Participants were randomized (1:1) to online intervention plus usual care or usual care alone. Resource use, collected via medical notes review, was valued using published unit costs in UK £Sterling 2021. Quality-of-life was elicited using proxy CHU-9D in Trial 1 and self-report EQ-5D-5L in Trial 2.

Results: The intervention was dominant (cost saving and more effective) with a high probability of cost-effectiveness (> 68%) in most analyses. The exception was the complete case cost-utility analysis for Trial 1 (omitting participants with children aged < 2), with adjusted incremental cost savings of -£34.15 (95% CI  - 104.54 to 36.24) and incremental QALYs of - 0.003 (95% CI  - 0.021 to 0.015) producing an incremental cost per QALY of £12,466. In the secondary combined (Trials 1 and 2) cost-effectiveness analysis, the adjusted incremental cost was -£20.35 (95% CI  - 55.41 to 14.70) with incremental success (≥ 2-point change on POEM) of 10.3% (95% CI 2.3-18.1%).

Conclusion: The free at point of use online eczema self-management intervention was low cost to run and cost-effective.

Trial registration: This trial was registered prospectively with the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN79282252). URL www.EczemaCareOnline.org.uk .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics: • Basics of health economic approaches and methods • Pharmacoeconomics • Health Care Systems • Pricing and Reimbursement Systems • Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信