为提高糖尿病风险预测模型的性能,是否应考虑胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR)、胰岛素分泌(HOMA-β)和内脏脂肪面积。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Huan Hu, Tohru Nakagawa, Toru Honda, Shuichiro Yamamoto, Tetsuya Mizoue
{"title":"为提高糖尿病风险预测模型的性能,是否应考虑胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR)、胰岛素分泌(HOMA-β)和内脏脂肪面积。","authors":"Huan Hu, Tohru Nakagawa, Toru Honda, Shuichiro Yamamoto, Tetsuya Mizoue","doi":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Insulin resistance and defects in pancreatic beta cells are the two major pathophysiologic abnormalities that underlie type 2 diabetes. In addition, visceral fat area (VFA) is reported to be a stronger predictor for diabetes than body mass index (BMI). Here, we tested whether the performance of diabetes prediction models could be improved by adding HOMA-IR and HOMA-β and replacing BMI with VFA.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We developed five prediction models using data from a cohort study (5578 individuals, of whom 94.7% were male, and 943 had incident diabetes). We conducted a baseline model (model 1) including age, sex, BMI, smoking, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and HbA1c. Subsequently, we developed another four models: model 2, predictors in model 1 plus fasting plasma glucose (FPG); model 3, predictors in model 1 plus HOMA-IR and HOMA-β; model 4, predictors in model 1 plus FPG, HOMA-IR, and HOMA-β; model 5, replaced BMI with VFA in model 2. We assessed model discrimination and calibration for the first 10 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The addition of FPG to model 1 obviously increased the value of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve from 0.79 (95% CI 0.78, 0.81) to 0.84 (0.83, 0.85). Compared with model 1, model 2 also significantly improved the risk reclassification and discrimination, with a continuous net reclassification improvement index of 0.61 (0.56, 0.70) and an integrated discrimination improvement index of 0.09 (0.08, 0.10). Adding HOMA-IR and HOMA-β (models 3 and 4) or replacing BMI with VFA (model 5) did not further materially improve the performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This cohort study, primarily composed of male workers, suggests that a model with BMI, FPG, and HbA1c effectively identifies those at high diabetes risk. However, adding HOMA-IR, HOMA-β, or replacing BMI with VFA does not significantly improve the model. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9151,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10806829/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), insulin secretion (HOMA-β), and visceral fat area be considered for improving the performance of diabetes risk prediction models.\",\"authors\":\"Huan Hu, Tohru Nakagawa, Toru Honda, Shuichiro Yamamoto, Tetsuya Mizoue\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Insulin resistance and defects in pancreatic beta cells are the two major pathophysiologic abnormalities that underlie type 2 diabetes. In addition, visceral fat area (VFA) is reported to be a stronger predictor for diabetes than body mass index (BMI). Here, we tested whether the performance of diabetes prediction models could be improved by adding HOMA-IR and HOMA-β and replacing BMI with VFA.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We developed five prediction models using data from a cohort study (5578 individuals, of whom 94.7% were male, and 943 had incident diabetes). We conducted a baseline model (model 1) including age, sex, BMI, smoking, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and HbA1c. Subsequently, we developed another four models: model 2, predictors in model 1 plus fasting plasma glucose (FPG); model 3, predictors in model 1 plus HOMA-IR and HOMA-β; model 4, predictors in model 1 plus FPG, HOMA-IR, and HOMA-β; model 5, replaced BMI with VFA in model 2. We assessed model discrimination and calibration for the first 10 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The addition of FPG to model 1 obviously increased the value of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve from 0.79 (95% CI 0.78, 0.81) to 0.84 (0.83, 0.85). Compared with model 1, model 2 also significantly improved the risk reclassification and discrimination, with a continuous net reclassification improvement index of 0.61 (0.56, 0.70) and an integrated discrimination improvement index of 0.09 (0.08, 0.10). Adding HOMA-IR and HOMA-β (models 3 and 4) or replacing BMI with VFA (model 5) did not further materially improve the performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This cohort study, primarily composed of male workers, suggests that a model with BMI, FPG, and HbA1c effectively identifies those at high diabetes risk. However, adding HOMA-IR, HOMA-β, or replacing BMI with VFA does not significantly improve the model. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10806829/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003680\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003680","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言胰岛素抵抗和胰岛β细胞缺陷是导致 2 型糖尿病的两大病理生理异常。此外,据报道,内脏脂肪面积(VFA)比体重指数(BMI)更能预测糖尿病。在此,我们测试了通过增加 HOMA-IR 和 HOMA-β,并用 VFA 取代 BMI,是否能提高糖尿病预测模型的性能:我们利用一项队列研究的数据(5578 人,其中 94.7% 为男性,943 人患有糖尿病)开发了五个预测模型。我们建立了一个基线模型(模型 1),包括年龄、性别、体重指数、吸烟、血脂异常、高血压和 HbA1c。随后,我们又建立了四个模型:模型 2,模型 1 中的预测因素加上空腹血浆葡萄糖(FPG);模型 3,模型 1 中的预测因素加上 HOMA-IR 和 HOMA-β;模型 4,模型 1 中的预测因素加上 FPG、HOMA-IR 和 HOMA-β;模型 5,在模型 2 中用 VFA 取代 BMI。我们对随访前 10 年的模型区分度和校准进行了评估:结果:在模型 1 中加入 FPG 后,接收者操作特征曲线下的面积值明显增加,从 0.79 (95% CI 0.78, 0.81) 增加到 0.84 (0.83, 0.85)。与模型 1 相比,模型 2 也显著提高了风险再分类和分辨能力,连续净再分类提高指数为 0.61(0.56, 0.70),综合分辨能力提高指数为 0.09(0.08, 0.10)。加入 HOMA-IR 和 HOMA-β(模型 3 和 4)或用 VFA 代替 BMI(模型 5)并没有进一步提高性能:这项主要由男性工人组成的队列研究表明,使用体重指数、血脂饱和度和 HbA1c 的模型可以有效识别糖尿病高危人群。然而,加入 HOMA-IR、HOMA-β 或用 VFA 代替 BMI 并不能显著改善模型。我们需要进一步的研究来证实我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Should insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), insulin secretion (HOMA-β), and visceral fat area be considered for improving the performance of diabetes risk prediction models.

Introduction: Insulin resistance and defects in pancreatic beta cells are the two major pathophysiologic abnormalities that underlie type 2 diabetes. In addition, visceral fat area (VFA) is reported to be a stronger predictor for diabetes than body mass index (BMI). Here, we tested whether the performance of diabetes prediction models could be improved by adding HOMA-IR and HOMA-β and replacing BMI with VFA.

Research design and methods: We developed five prediction models using data from a cohort study (5578 individuals, of whom 94.7% were male, and 943 had incident diabetes). We conducted a baseline model (model 1) including age, sex, BMI, smoking, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and HbA1c. Subsequently, we developed another four models: model 2, predictors in model 1 plus fasting plasma glucose (FPG); model 3, predictors in model 1 plus HOMA-IR and HOMA-β; model 4, predictors in model 1 plus FPG, HOMA-IR, and HOMA-β; model 5, replaced BMI with VFA in model 2. We assessed model discrimination and calibration for the first 10 years of follow-up.

Results: The addition of FPG to model 1 obviously increased the value of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve from 0.79 (95% CI 0.78, 0.81) to 0.84 (0.83, 0.85). Compared with model 1, model 2 also significantly improved the risk reclassification and discrimination, with a continuous net reclassification improvement index of 0.61 (0.56, 0.70) and an integrated discrimination improvement index of 0.09 (0.08, 0.10). Adding HOMA-IR and HOMA-β (models 3 and 4) or replacing BMI with VFA (model 5) did not further materially improve the performance.

Conclusions: This cohort study, primarily composed of male workers, suggests that a model with BMI, FPG, and HbA1c effectively identifies those at high diabetes risk. However, adding HOMA-IR, HOMA-β, or replacing BMI with VFA does not significantly improve the model. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
123
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care is an open access journal committed to publishing high-quality, basic and clinical research articles regarding type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and associated complications. Only original content will be accepted, and submissions are subject to rigorous peer review to ensure the publication of high-quality — and evidence-based — original research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信