雅克-朗西埃的左翼文学理论与毛泽东的文艺思想

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, ROMANCE
Zhenjiang Han
{"title":"雅克-朗西埃的左翼文学理论与毛泽东的文艺思想","authors":"Zhenjiang Han","doi":"10.1080/17409292.2024.2272508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The publication of French translations of Mao’s canonical works in the 1950s and 1960s sparked interest among French-left intellectuals. This paper investigates Rancière’s appropriation and reinvention of Mao’s thinking as an illustration of the exchange between Maoism and contemporary French left-wing theories on literature and art. First, drawing on Mao’s “mass line,” Rancière values the autonomy of the people rather than the leadership of the Althusserian intellectual elites. Second, Rancière’s “part of those that have no part” differs from Mao’s “the people” in the concept’s scope and in how they are transformed into political subjects. Third, deeply indebted to Mao’s “the people’s literature and art” that underscores the centrality of ordinary people and their lives, Rancière’s theory of politics of literature unleashes the liberating force of art and literature for the sensible of ordinary people, and calls for overthrowing the hierarchy of class politics.","PeriodicalId":10546,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary French and Francophone Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jacques Rancière’s Left-wing Literary Theory and Mao Zedong’s Thought on Literature and Art\",\"authors\":\"Zhenjiang Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17409292.2024.2272508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The publication of French translations of Mao’s canonical works in the 1950s and 1960s sparked interest among French-left intellectuals. This paper investigates Rancière’s appropriation and reinvention of Mao’s thinking as an illustration of the exchange between Maoism and contemporary French left-wing theories on literature and art. First, drawing on Mao’s “mass line,” Rancière values the autonomy of the people rather than the leadership of the Althusserian intellectual elites. Second, Rancière’s “part of those that have no part” differs from Mao’s “the people” in the concept’s scope and in how they are transformed into political subjects. Third, deeply indebted to Mao’s “the people’s literature and art” that underscores the centrality of ordinary people and their lives, Rancière’s theory of politics of literature unleashes the liberating force of art and literature for the sensible of ordinary people, and calls for overthrowing the hierarchy of class politics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary French and Francophone Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary French and Francophone Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17409292.2024.2272508\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, ROMANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary French and Francophone Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17409292.2024.2272508","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 20世纪50年代和60年代,毛泽东经典著作法文译本的出版引发了法国左翼知识分子的兴趣。本文研究朗西埃对毛泽东思想的挪用和再创造,以此说明毛泽东思想与当代法国左翼文艺理论之间的交流。首先,朗西埃借鉴了毛泽东的 "群众路线",重视人民的自主性,而不是阿尔都塞式的知识精英的领导权。其次,朗西埃的 "无部分者的部分 "与毛泽东的 "人民 "在概念范围和如何转化为政治主体方面有所不同。第三,朗西埃的文艺政治学理论深受毛泽东 "人民文艺 "的影响,强调普通人及其生活的中心地位,释放出文艺对普通人感性的解放力量,要求推翻阶级政治的等级制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Jacques Rancière’s Left-wing Literary Theory and Mao Zedong’s Thought on Literature and Art
Abstract The publication of French translations of Mao’s canonical works in the 1950s and 1960s sparked interest among French-left intellectuals. This paper investigates Rancière’s appropriation and reinvention of Mao’s thinking as an illustration of the exchange between Maoism and contemporary French left-wing theories on literature and art. First, drawing on Mao’s “mass line,” Rancière values the autonomy of the people rather than the leadership of the Althusserian intellectual elites. Second, Rancière’s “part of those that have no part” differs from Mao’s “the people” in the concept’s scope and in how they are transformed into political subjects. Third, deeply indebted to Mao’s “the people’s literature and art” that underscores the centrality of ordinary people and their lives, Rancière’s theory of politics of literature unleashes the liberating force of art and literature for the sensible of ordinary people, and calls for overthrowing the hierarchy of class politics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: An established journal of reference inviting all critical approaches on the latest debates and issues in the field, Contemporary French & Francophone Studies (formerly known as SITES) provides a forum not only for academics, but for novelists, poets, artists, journalists, and filmmakers as well. In addition to its focus on French and Francophone studies, one of the journal"s primary objectives is to reflect the interdisciplinary direction taken by the field and by the humanities and the arts in general. CF&FS is published five times per year, with four issues devoted to particular themes, and a fifth issue, “The Open Issue” welcoming non-thematic contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信