圣伯夫对雨果《莎士比亚》的奇异回应

IF 0.1 4区文学 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1353/mlr.2024.a916727

Roger Navas-Solé

{"title":"圣伯夫对雨果《莎士比亚》的奇异回应","authors":"Roger Navas-Solé","doi":"10.1353/mlr.2024.a916727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: This article studies Charles-Augustin Sainte-Beuve's and Victor Hugo's clashing perspectives on Don Quijote in texts written in 1864, namely, the former's review of Doré's illustrations for the novel and the latter's Shakespeare . Considering the intellectual history between the two, the article argues that they use Don Quijote to promote their different literary and political agendas, which leads to overly complicated readings of the novel. They both interpret Sancho's way of dealing with Quijote as a metaphor for the attitude that the French nation should have towards Napoleon III, but they fundamentally disagree in their descriptions of that relationship.","PeriodicalId":45399,"journal":{"name":"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sainte-Beuve's Quixotic Response to Hugo's Shakespeare\",\"authors\":\"Roger Navas-Solé\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/mlr.2024.a916727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT: This article studies Charles-Augustin Sainte-Beuve's and Victor Hugo's clashing perspectives on Don Quijote in texts written in 1864, namely, the former's review of Doré's illustrations for the novel and the latter's Shakespeare . Considering the intellectual history between the two, the article argues that they use Don Quijote to promote their different literary and political agendas, which leads to overly complicated readings of the novel. They both interpret Sancho's way of dealing with Quijote as a metaphor for the attitude that the French nation should have towards Napoleon III, but they fundamentally disagree in their descriptions of that relationship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/mlr.2024.a916727\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mlr.2024.a916727","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

ABSTRACT: 本文研究了夏尔-奥古斯丁-圣伯夫（Charles-Augustin Sainte-Beuve）和维克多-雨果（Victor Hugo）在 1864 年撰写的文章中对《堂吉诃德》的冲突观点，即前者对多雷的小说插图的评论和后者对莎士比亚的评论。考虑到两人之间的思想史，文章认为他们利用《堂吉诃德》来宣传各自不同的文学和政治议程，这导致了对小说过于复杂的解读。他们都将桑丘对待吉诃德的方式解释为法国民族对拿破仑三世应有态度的隐喻，但他们对这种关系的描述却存在根本分歧。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Sainte-Beuve's Quixotic Response to Hugo's Shakespeare

ABSTRACT: This article studies Charles-Augustin Sainte-Beuve's and Victor Hugo's clashing perspectives on Don Quijote in texts written in 1864, namely, the former's review of Doré's illustrations for the novel and the latter's Shakespeare . Considering the intellectual history between the two, the article argues that they use Don Quijote to promote their different literary and political agendas, which leads to overly complicated readings of the novel. They both interpret Sancho's way of dealing with Quijote as a metaphor for the attitude that the French nation should have towards Napoleon III, but they fundamentally disagree in their descriptions of that relationship.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW Multiple-

CiteScore

0.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

157

期刊介绍： With an unbroken publication record since 1905, its 1248 pages are divided between articles, predominantly on medieval and modern literature, in the languages of continental Europe, together with English (including the United States and the Commonwealth), Francophone Africa and Canada, and Latin America. In addition, MLR reviews over five hundred books each year The MLR Supplement The Modern Language Review was founded in 1905 and has included well over 3,000 articles and some 20,000 book reviews. This supplement to Volume 100 is published by the Modern Humanities Research Association in celebration of the centenary of its flagship journal.