基于不完整地震目录的余震预测:ETASI 模型在 2023 年土尔其东南部地震序列中的应用

S. Hainzl, T. Kumazawa, Y. Ogata
{"title":"基于不完整地震目录的余震预测:ETASI 模型在 2023 年土尔其东南部地震序列中的应用","authors":"S. Hainzl, T. Kumazawa, Y. Ogata","doi":"10.1093/gji/ggae006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Epidemic-Type Aftershock Sequence (ETAS) model is the state-of-the-art approach for modeling short-term earthquake clustering and is preferable for short-term aftershock forecasting. However, due to the large variability of different earthquake sequences, the model parameters must be adjusted to the local seismicity for accurate forecasting. Such an adjustment based on the first aftershocks is hampered by the incompleteness of earthquake catalogs after a mainshock, which can be explained by a blind period of the seismic networks after each earthquake, during which smaller events with lower magnitudes cannot be detected. Assuming a constant blind time, direct relationships based only on this additional parameter can be established between the actual seismicity rate and magnitude distributions and those that can be detected. The ETAS-Incomplete (ETASI) model uses these relationships to estimate the true ETAS parameters and the catalog incompleteness jointly. In this study, we apply the ETASI model to the SE Türkiye earthquake sequence, consisting of a doublet of M7.7 and M7.6 earthquakes that occurred within less than half a day of each other on February 6, 2023. We show that the ETASI model can explain the catalog incompleteness and fits the observed earthquake numbers and magnitudes well. A pseudo-prospective forecasting experiment shows that the daily number of detectable m ≥ 2 can be well predicted based on minimal and incomplete information from early aftershocks. However, the maximum magnitude (Mmax ) of the next day’s aftershocks would have been overestimated due to the highly variable b value within the sequence. Instead, using the regional b value estimated for 2000-2022 would have well predicted the observed Mmax  values.","PeriodicalId":502458,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Journal International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aftershock forecasts based on incomplete earthquake catalogs: ETASI model application to the 2023 SE Türkiye earthquake sequence\",\"authors\":\"S. Hainzl, T. Kumazawa, Y. Ogata\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gji/ggae006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The Epidemic-Type Aftershock Sequence (ETAS) model is the state-of-the-art approach for modeling short-term earthquake clustering and is preferable for short-term aftershock forecasting. However, due to the large variability of different earthquake sequences, the model parameters must be adjusted to the local seismicity for accurate forecasting. Such an adjustment based on the first aftershocks is hampered by the incompleteness of earthquake catalogs after a mainshock, which can be explained by a blind period of the seismic networks after each earthquake, during which smaller events with lower magnitudes cannot be detected. Assuming a constant blind time, direct relationships based only on this additional parameter can be established between the actual seismicity rate and magnitude distributions and those that can be detected. The ETAS-Incomplete (ETASI) model uses these relationships to estimate the true ETAS parameters and the catalog incompleteness jointly. In this study, we apply the ETASI model to the SE Türkiye earthquake sequence, consisting of a doublet of M7.7 and M7.6 earthquakes that occurred within less than half a day of each other on February 6, 2023. We show that the ETASI model can explain the catalog incompleteness and fits the observed earthquake numbers and magnitudes well. A pseudo-prospective forecasting experiment shows that the daily number of detectable m ≥ 2 can be well predicted based on minimal and incomplete information from early aftershocks. However, the maximum magnitude (Mmax ) of the next day’s aftershocks would have been overestimated due to the highly variable b value within the sequence. Instead, using the regional b value estimated for 2000-2022 would have well predicted the observed Mmax  values.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geophysical Journal International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geophysical Journal International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Journal International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

流行型余震序列(ETAS)模型是最先进的短期地震群集建模方法,也是短期余震预报的首选。然而,由于不同地震序列的变异性较大,必须根据当地的地震烈度调整模型参数,才能进行准确预报。基于第一次余震的这种调整由于主震后地震目录的不完整性而受到阻碍,这可以用每次地震后地震台网的盲区期来解释,在盲区期内,震级较低的较小事件无法被探测到。假设盲区时间恒定,则可以仅根据这一附加参数在实际地震率和震级分布与可探测到的地震率和震级分布之间建立直接关系。ETAS-Incomplete (ETASI) 模型利用这些关系来共同估计真实的 ETAS 参数和震级目录的不完整性。在本研究中,我们将 ETASI 模型应用于图尔基耶东南部地震序列,该地震序列由 M7.7 和 M7.6 级地震组成,它们在 2023 年 2 月 6 日不到半天的时间内相继发生。我们的研究表明,ETASI 模型可以解释震级目录的不完整性,并很好地拟合了观测到的地震次数和震级。一个伪前瞻性预报实验表明,根据早期余震的极少和不完整信息,可以很好地预测每天可探测到的 m≥2 的地震次数。然而,由于序列中的 b 值变化很大,第二天余震的最大震级(Mmax)会被高估。相反,使用 2000-2022 年估计的区域 b 值可以很好地预测观测到的最大震级值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aftershock forecasts based on incomplete earthquake catalogs: ETASI model application to the 2023 SE Türkiye earthquake sequence
The Epidemic-Type Aftershock Sequence (ETAS) model is the state-of-the-art approach for modeling short-term earthquake clustering and is preferable for short-term aftershock forecasting. However, due to the large variability of different earthquake sequences, the model parameters must be adjusted to the local seismicity for accurate forecasting. Such an adjustment based on the first aftershocks is hampered by the incompleteness of earthquake catalogs after a mainshock, which can be explained by a blind period of the seismic networks after each earthquake, during which smaller events with lower magnitudes cannot be detected. Assuming a constant blind time, direct relationships based only on this additional parameter can be established between the actual seismicity rate and magnitude distributions and those that can be detected. The ETAS-Incomplete (ETASI) model uses these relationships to estimate the true ETAS parameters and the catalog incompleteness jointly. In this study, we apply the ETASI model to the SE Türkiye earthquake sequence, consisting of a doublet of M7.7 and M7.6 earthquakes that occurred within less than half a day of each other on February 6, 2023. We show that the ETASI model can explain the catalog incompleteness and fits the observed earthquake numbers and magnitudes well. A pseudo-prospective forecasting experiment shows that the daily number of detectable m ≥ 2 can be well predicted based on minimal and incomplete information from early aftershocks. However, the maximum magnitude (Mmax ) of the next day’s aftershocks would have been overestimated due to the highly variable b value within the sequence. Instead, using the regional b value estimated for 2000-2022 would have well predicted the observed Mmax  values.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信