{"title":"阿哈诺夫-玻姆相的新表达式及其对量子力学基本原理的影响","authors":"A. Kholmetskii, T. Yarman, O. Missevitch","doi":"10.1515/zna-2023-0297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We focus on new expressions for the Aharonov–Bohm (AB) phase proposed recently by C. Marletto and V. Vedral (Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 040401 (2020)) and by our team (A. L. Kholmetskii et al., Ann. Phys., 434, 168627 (2021)). We emphasize the mismatch between the standard expression for the electric component of the AB phase and the expression by Marletto and Vedral for this component, which, as we show, has fundamental roots and indicates the need to use different expressions for the Hamiltonian of the radiative component and bound component of the electromagnetic (EM) field. We further show that the corrected expression for the AB phase of Marletto and Vedral and our expression for the AB phase do not coincide with its standard representation through the potentials of EM field (Y. Aharonov, D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 115 (1959) 485) and contain additional terms, which straightforwardly allow to re-express the AB phase via electric and magnetic fields instead of scalar and vector potentials. The recognition of the field-dependent origin of the AB effect also requires to re-express the Hamiltonian of a charged particle through the EM field, which we show can be done in the only possible way. We discuss the physical meaning of the AB effect with the primary role of the EM field and also discuss some general quantum mechanical implications.","PeriodicalId":23871,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A","volume":"51 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New expressions for the Aharonov–Bohm phase and consequences for the fundamentals of quantum mechanics\",\"authors\":\"A. Kholmetskii, T. Yarman, O. Missevitch\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/zna-2023-0297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract We focus on new expressions for the Aharonov–Bohm (AB) phase proposed recently by C. Marletto and V. Vedral (Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 040401 (2020)) and by our team (A. L. Kholmetskii et al., Ann. Phys., 434, 168627 (2021)). We emphasize the mismatch between the standard expression for the electric component of the AB phase and the expression by Marletto and Vedral for this component, which, as we show, has fundamental roots and indicates the need to use different expressions for the Hamiltonian of the radiative component and bound component of the electromagnetic (EM) field. We further show that the corrected expression for the AB phase of Marletto and Vedral and our expression for the AB phase do not coincide with its standard representation through the potentials of EM field (Y. Aharonov, D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 115 (1959) 485) and contain additional terms, which straightforwardly allow to re-express the AB phase via electric and magnetic fields instead of scalar and vector potentials. The recognition of the field-dependent origin of the AB effect also requires to re-express the Hamiltonian of a charged particle through the EM field, which we show can be done in the only possible way. We discuss the physical meaning of the AB effect with the primary role of the EM field and also discuss some general quantum mechanical implications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A\",\"volume\":\"51 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-2023-0297\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-2023-0297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要 我们重点讨论最近由 C. Marletto 和 V. Vedral(Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 040401 (2020))和我们团队(A. L. Kholmetskii et al.Phys., 434, 168627 (2021))。我们强调了 AB 相电分量的标准表达式与 Marletto 和 Vedral 对该分量的表达式之间的不匹配,正如我们所展示的,这种不匹配具有根本性的根源,并表明需要对电磁场的辐射分量和束缚分量的哈密尔顿使用不同的表达式。我们进一步证明,Marletto 和 Vedral 的 AB 相修正表达式和我们的 AB 相表达式与通过电磁场势(Y. Aharonov, D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 115 (1959) 485)的标准表达式并不一致,而是包含了附加项,可以直接通过电场和磁场而不是标量和矢量势来重新表达 AB 相。要认识到 AB 效应的场依赖性起源,还需要通过电磁场重新表达带电粒子的哈密顿,我们证明这是唯一可能的方法。我们讨论了以电磁场为主要作用的 AB 效应的物理意义,还讨论了一些一般量子力学含义。
New expressions for the Aharonov–Bohm phase and consequences for the fundamentals of quantum mechanics
Abstract We focus on new expressions for the Aharonov–Bohm (AB) phase proposed recently by C. Marletto and V. Vedral (Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 040401 (2020)) and by our team (A. L. Kholmetskii et al., Ann. Phys., 434, 168627 (2021)). We emphasize the mismatch between the standard expression for the electric component of the AB phase and the expression by Marletto and Vedral for this component, which, as we show, has fundamental roots and indicates the need to use different expressions for the Hamiltonian of the radiative component and bound component of the electromagnetic (EM) field. We further show that the corrected expression for the AB phase of Marletto and Vedral and our expression for the AB phase do not coincide with its standard representation through the potentials of EM field (Y. Aharonov, D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 115 (1959) 485) and contain additional terms, which straightforwardly allow to re-express the AB phase via electric and magnetic fields instead of scalar and vector potentials. The recognition of the field-dependent origin of the AB effect also requires to re-express the Hamiltonian of a charged particle through the EM field, which we show can be done in the only possible way. We discuss the physical meaning of the AB effect with the primary role of the EM field and also discuss some general quantum mechanical implications.