旅客姓名记录 (PNR) 数据：欧盟如何通过实际限制乘客的基本权利来促进（虚拟）安全

IF 1.4 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

European Law Journal Pub Date : 2024-01-02 DOI:10.1111/eulj.12479

Emilio De Capitani

{"title":"旅客姓名记录 (PNR) 数据：欧盟如何通过实际限制乘客的基本权利来促进（虚拟）安全","authors":"Emilio De Capitani","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The use for security purposes of airline passenger data (PNR) has gradually come to the fore especially in EU-US relations because of the tension between those who considered the use of PNR an effective tool in the fight against terrorism and those who considered the interference in citizens' privacy disproportionate. The Court of Justice intervened decisively on the issue in June 2022 with the “Ligue des Droits Humains” Judgment C-817/19. This ruling should have been followed by a review of the national legislations that transposed the Directive. On the contrary, the Member States are still going in the opposite direction to that indicated by the Court.</p>","PeriodicalId":47166,"journal":{"name":"European Law Journal","volume":"29 1-2","pages":"212-222"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Passenger name record (PNR) data: How the EU is promoting (virtual) security by actually limiting Passengers' fundamental rights\",\"authors\":\"Emilio De Capitani\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eulj.12479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The use for security purposes of airline passenger data (PNR) has gradually come to the fore especially in EU-US relations because of the tension between those who considered the use of PNR an effective tool in the fight against terrorism and those who considered the interference in citizens' privacy disproportionate. The Court of Justice intervened decisively on the issue in June 2022 with the “Ligue des Droits Humains” Judgment C-817/19. This ruling should have been followed by a review of the national legislations that transposed the Directive. On the contrary, the Member States are still going in the opposite direction to that indicated by the Court.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"29 1-2\",\"pages\":\"212-222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eulj.12479\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eulj.12479","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

出于安全目的使用航空公司乘客数据（PNR）的问题逐渐凸显出来，尤其是在欧盟与美国的关系中，因为有人认为使用 PNR 是打击恐怖主义的有效工具，而有人则认为对公民隐私的干涉是不相称的。2022 年 6 月，法院通过 "人权联盟 "C-817/19 号判决对这一问题进行了果断干预。在做出这一裁决后，本应审查各国将该指令转化为国内立法的情况。相反，成员国仍在朝着与法院指示相反的方向发展。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Passenger name record (PNR) data: How the EU is promoting (virtual) security by actually limiting Passengers' fundamental rights

The use for security purposes of airline passenger data (PNR) has gradually come to the fore especially in EU-US relations because of the tension between those who considered the use of PNR an effective tool in the fight against terrorism and those who considered the interference in citizens' privacy disproportionate. The Court of Justice intervened decisively on the issue in June 2022 with the “Ligue des Droits Humains” Judgment C-817/19. This ruling should have been followed by a review of the national legislations that transposed the Directive. On the contrary, the Member States are still going in the opposite direction to that indicated by the Court.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

European Law Journal LAW-

CiteScore

2.10

自引率

21.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Law Journal represents an authoritative new approach to the study of European Law, developed specifically to express and develop the study and understanding of European law in its social, cultural, political and economic context. It has a highly reputed board of editors. The journal fills a major gap in the current literature on all issues of European law, and is essential reading for anyone studying or practising EU law and its diverse impact on the environment, national legal systems, local government, economic organizations, and European citizens. As well as focusing on the European Union, the journal also examines the national legal systems of countries in Western, Central and Eastern Europe and relations between Europe and other parts of the world, particularly the United States, Japan, China, India, Mercosur and developing countries. The journal is published in English but is dedicated to publishing native language articles and has a dedicated translation fund available for this purpose. It is a refereed journal.