博克大法官，或者，小心你选择的最高法院提名人

IF 1.8 3区社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE

Social Science Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-01-05 DOI:10.1111/ssqu.13334

Mikel Norris

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用反事实分析法评估罗伯特-博克担任成员的假想最高法院对案件的裁决是否会与实际最高法院不同。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Justice Bork, or, be careful which supreme court nominees you choose to fight

This study uses counterfactual analysis to assess whether a hypothetical Supreme Court with Robert Bork as a member would have decided cases differently than the actual Supreme Court.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Social Science Quarterly Multiple-

CiteScore

3.40

自引率

10.50%

发文量

111

期刊介绍： Nationally recognized as one of the top journals in the field, Social Science Quarterly (SSQ) publishes current research on a broad range of topics including political science, sociology, economics, history, social work, geography, international studies, and women"s studies. SSQ is the journal of the Southwestern Social Science Association.