在组织环境中衡量幸福感:探索将 "美好生活指数 "作为衡量工具

IF 2.9 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Susana Dias, Sílvia Luís, Bernardo Cruz
{"title":"在组织环境中衡量幸福感:探索将 \"美好生活指数 \"作为衡量工具","authors":"Susana Dias, Sílvia Luís, Bernardo Cruz","doi":"10.1108/srj-07-2023-0375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to explore prevailing perceptions and practices related to well-being indexes within organizations, using the Better Life Index (BLI) as an example.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This investigation consists of two surveys in Portugal. Study 1 (N = 311) explores public perceptions of well-being in business and its relationship with socio-demographic factors. Results show a highly positive attitude toward organizational well-being, with a preference for companies prioritizing well-being over higher salaries. Study 2 (N = 62) shifts focus to business characteristics linked to the intention of implementing well-being indexes and examines the impact of Study 1 findings on organizational representatives’ responses.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings reveal a positive and statistically significant correlation between the intention to adopt well-being indexes and both company size and sector. The dissemination of Study 1’s results acted as a catalyst for organizational representatives, motivating them to adopt well-being indexes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>This research marks an initial step in incorporating well-being indexes in organizational settings. Future research should focus on identifying organizational factors that could hinder or encourage the adoption of well-being indexes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The results contribute to understanding which factors might be relevant when deciding whether and how to measure well-being at organizations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study highlights the potential effectiveness of these indexes in promoting well-being within organizations, while also examining the feasibility of using the BLI to assess the impact of businesses on various well-being dimensions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47615,"journal":{"name":"Social Responsibility Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring well-being at organizational context: exploring the Better Life Index as a measurement tool\",\"authors\":\"Susana Dias, Sílvia Luís, Bernardo Cruz\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/srj-07-2023-0375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This study aims to explore prevailing perceptions and practices related to well-being indexes within organizations, using the Better Life Index (BLI) as an example.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>This investigation consists of two surveys in Portugal. Study 1 (N = 311) explores public perceptions of well-being in business and its relationship with socio-demographic factors. Results show a highly positive attitude toward organizational well-being, with a preference for companies prioritizing well-being over higher salaries. Study 2 (N = 62) shifts focus to business characteristics linked to the intention of implementing well-being indexes and examines the impact of Study 1 findings on organizational representatives’ responses.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The findings reveal a positive and statistically significant correlation between the intention to adopt well-being indexes and both company size and sector. The dissemination of Study 1’s results acted as a catalyst for organizational representatives, motivating them to adopt well-being indexes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>This research marks an initial step in incorporating well-being indexes in organizational settings. Future research should focus on identifying organizational factors that could hinder or encourage the adoption of well-being indexes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>The results contribute to understanding which factors might be relevant when deciding whether and how to measure well-being at organizations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This study highlights the potential effectiveness of these indexes in promoting well-being within organizations, while also examining the feasibility of using the BLI to assess the impact of businesses on various well-being dimensions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Responsibility Journal\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Responsibility Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-07-2023-0375\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Responsibility Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-07-2023-0375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在以 "美好生活指数"(BLI)为例,探讨组织内与幸福指数相关的普遍看法和做法。研究 1(N = 311)探讨了公众对企业福利的看法及其与社会人口因素的关系。结果表明,公众对组织福利持非常积极的态度,认为公司优先考虑福利而不是高薪。研究 2(N = 62)将重点转移到与实施福利指数的意向有关的企业特征上,并考察研究 1 的结果对组织代表反应的影响。研究结果显示,采用福利指数的意向与公司规模和行业之间存在统计意义上的显著正相关。研究 1 结果的传播对组织代表起到了催化剂的作用,促使他们采用幸福指数。研究局限/影响本研究标志着在组织环境中采用幸福指数迈出了第一步。今后的研究应侧重于确定可能阻碍或鼓励采用幸福指数的组织因素。原创性/价值本研究强调了这些指数在促进组织内部幸福感方面的潜在有效性,同时还探讨了使用幸福指数评估企业对不同幸福维度的影响的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring well-being at organizational context: exploring the Better Life Index as a measurement tool

Purpose

This study aims to explore prevailing perceptions and practices related to well-being indexes within organizations, using the Better Life Index (BLI) as an example.

Design/methodology/approach

This investigation consists of two surveys in Portugal. Study 1 (N = 311) explores public perceptions of well-being in business and its relationship with socio-demographic factors. Results show a highly positive attitude toward organizational well-being, with a preference for companies prioritizing well-being over higher salaries. Study 2 (N = 62) shifts focus to business characteristics linked to the intention of implementing well-being indexes and examines the impact of Study 1 findings on organizational representatives’ responses.

Findings

The findings reveal a positive and statistically significant correlation between the intention to adopt well-being indexes and both company size and sector. The dissemination of Study 1’s results acted as a catalyst for organizational representatives, motivating them to adopt well-being indexes.

Research limitations/implications

This research marks an initial step in incorporating well-being indexes in organizational settings. Future research should focus on identifying organizational factors that could hinder or encourage the adoption of well-being indexes.

Practical implications

The results contribute to understanding which factors might be relevant when deciding whether and how to measure well-being at organizations.

Originality/value

This study highlights the potential effectiveness of these indexes in promoting well-being within organizations, while also examining the feasibility of using the BLI to assess the impact of businesses on various well-being dimensions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Social Responsibility Journal, the official journal of the Social Responsibility Research Network, is interdisciplinary in its scope and encourages submissions from any discipline or any part of the world which addresses any element of the journal''s aims. The journal encompasses the full range of theoretical, methodological and substantive debates in the area of social responsibility. Contributions which address the link between different disciplines and / or implications for societal, organisational or individual behavior are especially encouraged. The journal publishes theoretical and empirical papers, speculative essays and review articles. The journal also publishes special themed issues under the guidance of a guest editor. Coverage: Accountability and accounting- Issues concerning sustainability- Economy and finance- Governance- Stakeholder interactions- Ecology and environment- Corporate activity and behaviour- Ethics and morality- Governmental and trans-governmental regulation- Globalisation and disintermediation- Individuals and corporate citizenship- Transparency and disclosure- Consumption and its consequences- Corporate and other forms of organization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信