单侧颈椎病患者呼吸运动人工评估的评分者间和评分者内可靠性：横断面研究

IF 1.1 4区医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100708

Amin Kordi Yoosefinejad , Raziyeh Yousefiyan , Raziyeh Nazari , Iman Rezaei

{"title":"单侧颈椎病患者呼吸运动人工评估的评分者间和评分者内可靠性：横断面研究","authors":"Amin Kordi Yoosefinejad , Raziyeh Yousefiyan , Raziyeh Nazari , Iman Rezaei","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Altered breathing pattern is a consequence of dysfunctional breathing. The respiratory pattern might be impaired </span>in patients<span> with cervical radiculopathy<span> due to the involvement of common nerve roots with the phrenic nerve (C3– C5).</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of a technique for evaluating the breathing pattern known as manual assessment of respiratory motion (MARM) in patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Rehabilitation Sciences Research Center</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Twenty-five patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy aged 30–55 years participated in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two experienced physical therapists investigated the respiratory pattern of the patients during normal and deep breathing using MARM, separately. Assessments were repeated again a week apart by each examiner. The inter- and intra-rater reliability of the MARM were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>“Very good” inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were found with the MARM values during both normal and deep breathing patterns. (Inter-rater: ICC range = 0.71 to 0.82; intra-rater: ICC range = 0.72 to 0.80).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>MARM is a reliable clinical and research tool for assessing breathing patterns with very good inter- and intra-rater reliability in patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of manual assessment of respiratory motion in patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Amin Kordi Yoosefinejad , Raziyeh Yousefiyan , Raziyeh Nazari , Iman Rezaei\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100708\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Altered breathing pattern is a consequence of dysfunctional breathing. The respiratory pattern might be impaired </span>in patients<span> with cervical radiculopathy<span> due to the involvement of common nerve roots with the phrenic nerve (C3– C5).</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of a technique for evaluating the breathing pattern known as manual assessment of respiratory motion (MARM) in patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Rehabilitation Sciences Research Center</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Twenty-five patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy aged 30–55 years participated in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two experienced physical therapists investigated the respiratory pattern of the patients during normal and deep breathing using MARM, separately. Assessments were repeated again a week apart by each examiner. The inter- and intra-rater reliability of the MARM were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>“Very good” inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were found with the MARM values during both normal and deep breathing patterns. (Inter-rater: ICC range = 0.71 to 0.82; intra-rater: ICC range = 0.72 to 0.80).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>MARM is a reliable clinical and research tool for assessing breathing patterns with very good inter- and intra-rater reliability in patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746068924000014\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746068924000014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景呼吸模式的改变是呼吸功能障碍的结果。本研究旨在调查单侧颈椎病患者呼吸模式评估技术（即手动呼吸运动评估技术（MARM））在评分者之间和评分者内部的可靠性。方法两名经验丰富的物理治疗师使用 MARM 分别对患者正常呼吸和深呼吸时的呼吸模式进行调查。两位经验丰富的物理治疗师分别使用 MARM 对患者正常呼吸和深呼吸时的呼吸模式进行了调查，每位检查者间隔一周再次进行评估。结果发现，正常呼吸和深呼吸模式下的 MARM 值在评分者之间和评分者内部都具有 "很好的 "可靠性。(评分者之间评分者之间：ICC 范围 = 0.71 至 0.82；评分者内部：ICC 范围 = 0.72 至 0.82：结论 MARM 是一种可靠的临床和研究工具，用于评估单侧颈椎病患者的呼吸模式，其评分者之间和评分者内部的可靠性都非常好。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of manual assessment of respiratory motion in patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy: A cross-sectional study

Background

Altered breathing pattern is a consequence of dysfunctional breathing. The respiratory pattern might be impaired in patients with cervical radiculopathy due to the involvement of common nerve roots with the phrenic nerve (C3– C5).

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of a technique for evaluating the breathing pattern known as manual assessment of respiratory motion (MARM) in patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

Rehabilitation Sciences Research Center

Participants

Twenty-five patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy aged 30–55 years participated in this study.

Methods

Two experienced physical therapists investigated the respiratory pattern of the patients during normal and deep breathing using MARM, separately. Assessments were repeated again a week apart by each examiner. The inter- and intra-rater reliability of the MARM were calculated.

Results

“Very good” inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were found with the MARM values during both normal and deep breathing patterns. (Inter-rater: ICC range = 0.71 to 0.82; intra-rater: ICC range = 0.72 to 0.80).

Conclusions

MARM is a reliable clinical and research tool for assessing breathing patterns with very good inter- and intra-rater reliability in patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine 医学-医学：内科

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

36.80%

发文量

审稿时长

3 months

期刊介绍： The International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine is a peer-reviewed journal that provides for the publication of high quality research articles and review papers that are as broad as the many disciplines that influence and underpin the principles and practice of osteopathic medicine. Particular emphasis is given to basic science research, clinical epidemiology and health social science in relation to osteopathy and neuromusculoskeletal medicine. The Editorial Board encourages submission of articles based on both quantitative and qualitative research designs. The Editorial Board also aims to provide a forum for discourse and debate on any aspect of osteopathy and neuromusculoskeletal medicine with the aim of critically evaluating existing practices in regard to the diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neuromusculoskeletal disorders and somatic dysfunction. All manuscripts submitted to the IJOM are subject to a blinded review process. The categories currently available for publication include reports of original research, review papers, commentaries and articles related to clinical practice, including case reports. Further details can be found in the IJOM Instructions for Authors. Manuscripts are accepted for publication with the understanding that no substantial part has been, or will be published elsewhere.