YouTubeTM 上有关使用股四头肌腱自体移植物进行前交叉韧带重建的视频质量并不令人满意。

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
{"title":"YouTubeTM 上有关使用股四头肌腱自体移植物进行前交叉韧带重建的视频质量并不令人满意。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p><span>To assess the validity and informational value of teaching material regarding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using </span>quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft provided on the YouTube video platform.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An extensive systematic search of the YouTube video platform was performed, and all videos that met the criteria were included in the analysis. The analysis of the video content was performed using the DISCERN instrument, <em>Journal of American Medical Association</em> (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and Global Quality Score (GQS). The duration of the videos, the date of publication, and the number of likes and views were recorded. Furthermore, videos were categorized based on the source (physicians, companies, patients), the subject (surgical technique, patient experience and overview [overview videos were videos in which multiple aspects were analyzed]), and the type of content (educational or subjective patient experience).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 88 videos were included in the analysis. Seventy-one (80.7%) videos were published by physicians, 15 (17.0%) by patients, and 2 (2.3%) by companies. The majority of the videos described various surgical techniques (59%-67.0%), 80.7% of the videos (72%-81.8%) had an educational nature, and the remaining 18.2% described patient experiences. The mean length of the videos was 8.21 ± 7.88 minutes. The mean number of views was 3,988.51 ± 9,792.98 (range 9-56,047), whereas the mean numbers of comments and likes were 30.07 ± 70.07 (range 0-493) and 4.48 ± 14.22 (range 0-82), respectively. The mean DISCERN score, JAMA score, and GQS were 27.43 ±11.56 (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.01-29.85; range: 17-68), 1.22 ± 0.85 (95% CI 1.04-1.40; range 0-3), and 1.82 ± 0.93 (95% CI 1.63-2.01; range 1-4), respectively. For all scores, videos published by physicians had greater quality (DISCERN score, JAMA score, and GQS) (<em>P</em> &lt; .05). Among all of the analyzed videos, overview videos were of the highest quality (<em>P</em> &lt; .05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>YouTube is a fast and open-access source of mass information. The overall quality of the videos on ACLR performed using QT autograft was unsatisfactory, demonstrating low educational quality and reliability. Currently, YouTube cannot be recommended as a reliable source of information on ACLR with the QT.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><p>Surgeons treating anterior cruciate ligament injuries should take special care when suggesting outside sources for patients to use to further educate themselves about this procedure. Due to the poor quality of the content, orthopaedic health care professionals should alert patients about the inaccuracies of YouTube videos addressing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the quadriceps tendon. Additionally, health care practitioners should attempt to offer patients better options.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of YouTube Videos Regarding Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Is Unsatisfactory\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p><span>To assess the validity and informational value of teaching material regarding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using </span>quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft provided on the YouTube video platform.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An extensive systematic search of the YouTube video platform was performed, and all videos that met the criteria were included in the analysis. The analysis of the video content was performed using the DISCERN instrument, <em>Journal of American Medical Association</em> (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and Global Quality Score (GQS). The duration of the videos, the date of publication, and the number of likes and views were recorded. Furthermore, videos were categorized based on the source (physicians, companies, patients), the subject (surgical technique, patient experience and overview [overview videos were videos in which multiple aspects were analyzed]), and the type of content (educational or subjective patient experience).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 88 videos were included in the analysis. Seventy-one (80.7%) videos were published by physicians, 15 (17.0%) by patients, and 2 (2.3%) by companies. The majority of the videos described various surgical techniques (59%-67.0%), 80.7% of the videos (72%-81.8%) had an educational nature, and the remaining 18.2% described patient experiences. The mean length of the videos was 8.21 ± 7.88 minutes. The mean number of views was 3,988.51 ± 9,792.98 (range 9-56,047), whereas the mean numbers of comments and likes were 30.07 ± 70.07 (range 0-493) and 4.48 ± 14.22 (range 0-82), respectively. The mean DISCERN score, JAMA score, and GQS were 27.43 ±11.56 (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.01-29.85; range: 17-68), 1.22 ± 0.85 (95% CI 1.04-1.40; range 0-3), and 1.82 ± 0.93 (95% CI 1.63-2.01; range 1-4), respectively. For all scores, videos published by physicians had greater quality (DISCERN score, JAMA score, and GQS) (<em>P</em> &lt; .05). Among all of the analyzed videos, overview videos were of the highest quality (<em>P</em> &lt; .05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>YouTube is a fast and open-access source of mass information. The overall quality of the videos on ACLR performed using QT autograft was unsatisfactory, demonstrating low educational quality and reliability. Currently, YouTube cannot be recommended as a reliable source of information on ACLR with the QT.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><p>Surgeons treating anterior cruciate ligament injuries should take special care when suggesting outside sources for patients to use to further educate themselves about this procedure. Due to the poor quality of the content, orthopaedic health care professionals should alert patients about the inaccuracies of YouTube videos addressing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the quadriceps tendon. Additionally, health care practitioners should attempt to offer patients better options.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806324000021\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806324000021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在评估 YouTubeTM 视频平台上提供的有关使用股四头肌腱(QT)自体移植物进行前交叉韧带重建(ACL-R)的教学材料的有效性和信息价值。方法 对 YouTubeTM 视频平台进行了广泛的系统搜索,并将所有符合标准的视频纳入分析。使用 DISCERN 工具、《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)基准标准和全球质量评分(GQS)对视频内容进行分析。视频的持续时间、发布日期、点赞数和观看数都被记录了下来。此外,还根据视频来源(医生、公司、患者)、主题(手术技术、患者体验和概述[概述视频是对多个方面进行分析的视频])和内容类型(教育性或患者主观体验)对视频进行了分类。71部(80.7%)视频由医生发布,15部(17.0%)由患者发布,2部(2.3%)由公司发布。大部分视频描述了各种手术技术(59 - 67.0%),80.7%的视频(72 - 81.8%)具有教育性质,其余 18.2%的视频描述了患者的经历。视频的平均长度为 8.21 ± 7.88 分钟。平均观看次数为(3988.51±9792.98)次(范围:9-56047),平均评论数和点赞数分别为(30.07±70.07)次(范围:0-493)和(4.48±14.22)次(范围:0-82)。DISCERN评分、JAMA评分和GQS的平均值分别为27.43±11.56(95% CI:25.01-29.85;范围:17-68)、1.22±0.85(95% CI:1.04-1.40;范围:0-3)和1.82±0.93(95% CI:1.63-2.01;范围:1-4)。在所有评分中,医生发布的视频质量更高(DISCERN 评分、JAMA 评分和 GQS)(p<0.05)。在所有分析过的视频中,概述视频的质量最高(p<0.05)。使用 QT 自体移植物进行前交叉韧带重建的视频总体质量不尽人意,显示出教育质量和可靠性较低。目前,YouTube™ 还不能被推荐为使用股四头肌腱进行前交叉韧带重建的可靠信息来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of YouTube Videos Regarding Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Is Unsatisfactory

Purpose

To assess the validity and informational value of teaching material regarding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft provided on the YouTube video platform.

Methods

An extensive systematic search of the YouTube video platform was performed, and all videos that met the criteria were included in the analysis. The analysis of the video content was performed using the DISCERN instrument, Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and Global Quality Score (GQS). The duration of the videos, the date of publication, and the number of likes and views were recorded. Furthermore, videos were categorized based on the source (physicians, companies, patients), the subject (surgical technique, patient experience and overview [overview videos were videos in which multiple aspects were analyzed]), and the type of content (educational or subjective patient experience).

Results

A total of 88 videos were included in the analysis. Seventy-one (80.7%) videos were published by physicians, 15 (17.0%) by patients, and 2 (2.3%) by companies. The majority of the videos described various surgical techniques (59%-67.0%), 80.7% of the videos (72%-81.8%) had an educational nature, and the remaining 18.2% described patient experiences. The mean length of the videos was 8.21 ± 7.88 minutes. The mean number of views was 3,988.51 ± 9,792.98 (range 9-56,047), whereas the mean numbers of comments and likes were 30.07 ± 70.07 (range 0-493) and 4.48 ± 14.22 (range 0-82), respectively. The mean DISCERN score, JAMA score, and GQS were 27.43 ±11.56 (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.01-29.85; range: 17-68), 1.22 ± 0.85 (95% CI 1.04-1.40; range 0-3), and 1.82 ± 0.93 (95% CI 1.63-2.01; range 1-4), respectively. For all scores, videos published by physicians had greater quality (DISCERN score, JAMA score, and GQS) (P < .05). Among all of the analyzed videos, overview videos were of the highest quality (P < .05).

Conclusions

YouTube is a fast and open-access source of mass information. The overall quality of the videos on ACLR performed using QT autograft was unsatisfactory, demonstrating low educational quality and reliability. Currently, YouTube cannot be recommended as a reliable source of information on ACLR with the QT.

Clinical Relevance

Surgeons treating anterior cruciate ligament injuries should take special care when suggesting outside sources for patients to use to further educate themselves about this procedure. Due to the poor quality of the content, orthopaedic health care professionals should alert patients about the inaccuracies of YouTube videos addressing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the quadriceps tendon. Additionally, health care practitioners should attempt to offer patients better options.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信